NCT01060046

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate what happens to biologic mesh in the body over time on a molecular level. To date, it is not known what agents, enzymes, or proteins are interacting at the implantation site that contributes to mesh remodeling and/or degradation. Investigators on this project will identify patients with previously placed mesh who are needing reoperation on the same site and take a biopsy of the mesh during the normal course of surgery. Basic data surrounding the surgical procedure will be collected. The mesh samples will be analyzed for enzymes and proteins and examined histologically for processes that signify remodeling and/or degradation. Control patients will undergo biopsy of abdominal fascia at laparoscopic trocar sites in a manner that will not affect the outcome(s) of their procedure or other risk to the incision site.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
241

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2007

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2007

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 28, 2010

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 1, 2010

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 14, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

9.4 years

First QC Date

January 28, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 7, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

biologic meshventral hernia repairbreast reconstructionMMPs

Study Arms (2)

Patients with previously implanted biologic mesh

All patients undergoing a repeat operation to repair a recurrent hernia or to revise a surgical site which has been previously repaired using a biologic mesh.

Control patients

Any patient undergoing a surgical procedure where fascial biopsy would not compromise the integrity of the procedure.

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients will be selected from the practices of the surgeons listed on the investigational team.

You may qualify if:

  • All patients undergoing a repeat operation to repair a recurrent hernia or revise a surgical site which has been previously repaired using one of the aforementioned biologic meshes. Any patient undergoing a surgical procedure where fascial biopsy would not compromise the integrity of the procedure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Buinewicz B, Rosen B. Acellular cadaveric dermis (AlloDerm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Feb;52(2):188-94. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000100895.41198.27.

    PMID: 14745271BACKGROUND
  • Burger JW, Halm JA, Wijsmuller AR, ten Raa S, Jeekel J. Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1320-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0706-4. Epub 2006 Jul 24.

    PMID: 16865616BACKGROUND
  • Butler CE, Prieto VG. Reduction of adhesions with composite AlloDerm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Aug;114(2):464-73. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000132670.81794.7e.

    PMID: 15277815BACKGROUND
  • Butler CE. The role of bioprosthetics in abdominal wall reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2006 Apr;33(2):199-211, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2005.12.009.

    PMID: 16638463BACKGROUND
  • Butler CE, Langstein HN, Kronowitz SJ. Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Oct;116(5):1263-75; discussion 1276-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000181692.71901.bd.

    PMID: 16217466BACKGROUND
  • Dalla Vecchia L, Engum S, Kogon B, Jensen E, Davis M, Grosfeld J. Evaluation of small intestine submucosa and acellular dermis as diaphragmatic prostheses. J Pediatr Surg. 1999 Jan;34(1):167-71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90250-6.

    PMID: 10022165BACKGROUND
  • Diaz S, Brunt LM, Klingensmith ME, Frisella PM, Soper NJ. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: medium-term outcome of 116 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Jan;7(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00151-8.

    PMID: 12559186BACKGROUND
  • Draaisma WA, Gooszen HG, Tournoij E, Broeders IA. Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair: a review of literature. Surg Endosc. 2005 Oct;19(10):1300-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2275-3. Epub 2005 Aug 4.

    PMID: 16151684BACKGROUND
  • Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2-year follow-up. Hernia. 2004 Aug;8(3):186-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-004-0208-7. Epub 2004 Feb 26.

    PMID: 14991410BACKGROUND
  • Holton LH 3rd, Kim D, Silverman RP, Rodriguez ED, Singh N, Goldberg NH. Human acellular dermal matrix for repair of abdominal wall defects: review of clinical experience and experimental data. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15(5):547-58. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i5.70.

    PMID: 16218902BACKGROUND
  • Kish KJ, Buinewicz BR, Morris JB. Acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm): new material in the repair of stoma site hernias. Am Surg. 2005 Dec;71(12):1047-50.

    PMID: 16447477BACKGROUND
  • Kolker AR, Brown DJ, Redstone JS, Scarpinato VM, Wallack MK. Multilayer reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with acellular dermal allograft (AlloDerm) and component separation. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Jul;55(1):36-41; discussion 41-2. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000168248.83197.d4.

    PMID: 15985789BACKGROUND
  • Miller RS, Morris JA Jr, Diaz JJ Jr, Herring MB, May AK. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1365-71; discussion 1371-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196004.49422.af.

    PMID: 16394910BACKGROUND
  • Oelschlager BK, Barreca M, Chang L, Pellegrini CA. The use of small intestine submucosa in the repair of paraesophageal hernias: initial observations of a new technique. Am J Surg. 2003 Jul;186(1):4-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00114-4.

    PMID: 12842738BACKGROUND
  • Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, Soper N, Brunt M, Sheppard B, Jobe B, Polissar N, Mitsumori L, Nelson J, Swanstrom L. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2006 Oct;244(4):481-90. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000237759.42831.03.

    PMID: 16998356BACKGROUND
  • Scott BG, Welsh FJ, Pham HQ, Carrick MM, Liscum KR, Granchi TS, Wall MJ Jr, Mattox KL, Hirshberg A. Early aggressive closure of the open abdomen. J Trauma. 2006 Jan;60(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000200861.96568.bb.

    PMID: 16456431BACKGROUND
  • Silverman RP, Li EN, Holton LH 3rd, Sawan KT, Goldberg NH. Ventral hernia repair using allogenic acellular dermal matrix in a swine model. Hernia. 2004 Dec;8(4):336-42. doi: 10.1007/s10029-004-0241-6.

    PMID: 15185131BACKGROUND
  • Cavallo JA, Roma AA, Jasielec MS, Ousley J, Creamer J, Pichert MD, Baalman S, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Deeken CR. Remodeling characteristics and collagen distribution in biological scaffold materials explanted from human subjects after abdominal soft tissue reconstruction: an analysis of scaffold remodeling characteristics by patient risk factors and surgical site classifications. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):405-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000471.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Biopsy samples of previously implanted biologic meshes, biopsy samples of native abdominal wall fascia

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Ventral

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, AbdominalHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Brent D Matthews, MD

    Washington University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Corey Deeken, PhD

    Washington University School of Medicine

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2010

First Posted

February 1, 2010

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion

January 1, 2017

Study Completion

January 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 14, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05

Locations