A Comparison Study of Two Community Outreach-Based Approaches to Increase Participation of Women Living in the Mississippi Delta in Cervical Cancer Screening
2 other identifiers
observational
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background:
- The Mississippi Delta (which includes the counties along the Mississippi River) is one of the poorest areas in the United States. Women living in the Mississippi Delta have disproportionately high rates of cervical cancer, but they are unlikely to come to clinics except perhaps for giving birth, years before they are diagnosed with cancer.
- To improve rates of screening, researchers are attempting an outreach study to see whether under-screened women, if approached by door-to-door recruitment, would get screened by one of two methods (home-based self-collection and testing, or a clinic exam) and which method they would prefer. Objectives: \- To assess/measure increased participation of under-screened women living in the Mississippi Delta in cervical cancer screening by offering women the opportunity to get screened by one of two possible community outreach-based cervical cancer screening modalities, self-collection and HPV testing or clinic-based cytology screening, the current standard of care. Eligibility: \- Women between 26 and 65 years of age, who are not pregnant currently or in the past 8 weeks, have an intact cervix, have no history of cancer, and have not been screened for cervical cancer in the past 3 years. Design:
- Researchers will recruit participants on a door-to-door basis. Researchers will recruit all eligible women within a household. Recruitment will be done only during daylight hours but at the end of the working day to maximize the chances of finding women at home.
- Eligible women willing to participate will complete a questionnaire with demographic and medical information.
- Participants will be asked to choose the screening method of their preference. If they choose self-collection with HPV testing, they will be given a self-collection kit and asked to perform the self-collection and return the kit within 1 month. Participants who choose to have cytology screening will be provided with the phone number and location of the local health department clinic and will be encouraged to schedule their screening within the following month.
- Women who do not complete their participation within 1 month will be considered noncompliant with their chosen intervention. Researchers will re-contact noncompliant women to offer them participation in the study, including permitting them to refuse to participate or to choose the alternative intervention....
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 22, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 13, 2011
CompletedJuly 2, 2017
April 13, 2011
January 27, 2010
June 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women who are age 26-65 years, not pregnant currently or in the past 8 weeks, who have an intact cervix, no history of cancer, have not been screened for cervical cancer in the last 3 years, and able and competent to provide informed consent will be considered eligible for the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Women under 26 or over 65 years of age.
- Pregnant women or women who have given birth to a child in the past 8 weeks. To insure women included in the study are not pregnant, we will ask women during the consenting process if they are pregnant or gave recently given birth. Women who answer yes for either query will be excluded.
- Women who have had a total hysterectomy.
- History of cervical cancer
- Screened for cervical cancer in the last 3 years.
- Other reasons to exclude women include the inability to speak English, the appearance of mental incompetence, or refusal to participate or sign the informed consent form.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cancer Institute (NCI), 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (3)
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71-96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
PMID: 18287387BACKGROUNDCuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, Meijer CJ, Hoyer H, Ratnam S, Szarewski A, Birembaut P, Kulasingam S, Sasieni P, Iftner T. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;119(5):1095-101. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21955.
PMID: 16586444BACKGROUNDDillner J, Rebolj M, Birembaut P, Petry KU, Szarewski A, Munk C, de Sanjose S, Naucler P, Lloveras B, Kjaer S, Cuzick J, van Ballegooijen M, Clavel C, Iftner T; Joint European Cohort Study. Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study. BMJ. 2008 Oct 13;337:a1754. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1754.
PMID: 18852164BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2010
First Posted
January 28, 2010
Study Start
December 22, 2009
Study Completion
April 13, 2011
Last Updated
July 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2011-04-13