Study Stopped
Sponsor stopped study for business reasons; not for clinical or clinical outcomes reasons.
Post-Market Randomized Trial: Endoscopically- Guided Ablation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation
En-GARDE
Post-Market Randomized Controlled Trial: Endoscopically- Guided Ablation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation GuideD by Electroanatomical Mapping to Achieve Permanent Pulmonary Vein Isolation (En-GARDE)
1 other identifier
interventional
21
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
To compare the safety and chronic Pulmonary Vein isolation of 2 ablation types.
- 1.visually guided ablation (VGA) using the EAS-AC and
- 2.radiofrequency ablation
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Dec 2009
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 1, 2016
July 1, 2016
1.5 years
January 26, 2010
April 18, 2016
July 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of Permanent Pulmonary Vein Isolation of EAS-AC Compared to EAM Guided Radiofrequency Ablation
Number of initially isolated pulmonary veins that remain isolated at a 3 month remapping. The unit of measure is treated pulmonary veins (PVs).
3 Months
Study Arms (2)
Radiofrequency Ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPVI using RF ablation
Visually Guided Ablation
EXPERIMENTALPVI using visually guided ablation with an endoscopic ablation system
Interventions
Endoscopically Guided Ablation using the EAS-AC
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CardioFocuslead
Study Sites (2)
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM)
Prague, 140 21, Czechia
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Rome, 00168, Italy
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Burke Barrett, VP, Regulatory & Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- CardioFocus, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vivek Reddy, MD
The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2010
First Posted
January 27, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 1, 2016
Results First Posted
August 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07