NCT01057173

Brief Summary

A randomized clinical trial of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients older than 70 years of age suffering from severe aortic valve stenosis. Study hypothesis: TAVI will reduce post-interventional morbidity and mortality compared to SAVR.

Trial Health

78
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
280

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
84mo left

Started Dec 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

3 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress70%
Dec 2009Apr 2033

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2010

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
19 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2033

Expected
Last Updated

November 22, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

January 26, 2010

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Heart Valve DiseaseHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationRandomized Controlled Trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Combined rate of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, and stroke

    Outcome measures will be defined as suggested by the Valvular Academic Research Consortium (VARC)

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Procedural complications

    Within first 30 days

  • Admission lengths (ICU and interventional center)

    Within first 30 days

  • Combined rate of noncardiac and cardiac death, prosthesis reintervention, cardiac-, cerebral-, renal-, and pulmonary complications

    1 year

  • Functional status (NYHA-classification) and Quality of Life (SF-36)

    1 year

  • Echocardiographic prosthesis and ventricular structural and functional status

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Interventions

Retrograde trans-femoral or trans-subclavian aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic CoreValve System(TM) bio-prosthesis (third generation system, 18 Fr, CE mark approved)

Also known as: TAVI
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Conventional surgical aortic valve replacement with a bio-prosthesis using normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and cold blood cardioplegia cardiac arrest

Also known as: SAVR
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Eligibility Criteria

Age70 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients must have severe degenerative aortic valve stenosis (echocardiographic criteria: AV effective orifice area (EOA) of \< 1 cm2, mean AV gradient of \> 40 mmHg, or AV peak systolic velocity of \> 4.0 m/s)
  • Patients must be symptomatic from the aortic valve stenosis (dyspnoea in NYHA-class II or greater, angina pectoris, or syncope), or asymptomatic but with echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, or atrial fibrillation)
  • Patients must be 70 years or older
  • Patients must be technical and anatomical eligible for both interventions (as specified by Medtronic CoreValve(TM) for the TAVI procedure) after a formal consult by a cardiologist and a cardiovascular surgeon
  • Patients must be expected to survive more than one year after the intervention
  • Patients must be able to provide written informed consent as approved by the regional ethical committee after having received adequate information about the study
  • Patients must be able and agree to return to all post-procedural follow-up visits

You may not qualify if:

  • Isolated aortic valve insufficiency
  • Other significant heart valve disease requiring intervention
  • Coronary artery co-morbidity requiring revascularisation
  • Any previous open heart surgery
  • Myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention within the last year
  • Stroke or TIA within the last 30 days
  • Renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis
  • Pulmonary insufficiency (FEV1 or diffusion capacity \< 40% of expected)
  • Active infectious disease requiring antibiotics
  • Emergency intervention (within 24 hours after the indication for intervention has been made)
  • Unstable pre-interventional condition requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance
  • A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to heparin or nitinol
  • Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Copenhagen University Hospital

Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

Location

Odense University Hospital

Odense, 5000, Denmark

Location

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Thyregod HG, Sondergaard L, Ihlemann N, Franzen O, Andersen LW, Hansen PB, Olsen PS, Nissen H, Winkel P, Gluud C, Steinbruchel DA. The Nordic aortic valve intervention (NOTION) trial comparing transcatheter versus surgical valve implantation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jan 9;14:11. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-11.

    PMID: 23302232BACKGROUND
  • Thyregod HG, Steinbruchel DA, Ihlemann N, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P, Chang Y, Franzen OW, Engstrom T, Clemmensen P, Hansen PB, Andersen LW, Olsen PS, Sondergaard L. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: 1-Year Results From the All-Comers NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 26;65(20):2184-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Mar 15.

  • Thyregod HG, Steinbruchel DA, Ihlemann N, Ngo TA, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Chang Y, Hansen PB, Olsen PS, Sondergaard L. No clinical effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate- and low-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at mid-term follow-up: an analysis from the NOTION trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Oct;50(4):721-728. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw095. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

  • Sondergaard L, Steinbruchel DA, Ihlemann N, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P, Ngo AT, Olsen NT, Chang Y, Franzen OW, Engstrom T, Clemmensen P, Olsen PS, Thyregod HG. Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6):e003665. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003665.

  • Ngo A, Hassager C, Thyregod HGH, Sondergaard L, Olsen PS, Steinbruchel D, Hansen PB, Kjaergaard J, Winther-Jensen M, Ihlemann N. Differences in left ventricular remodelling in patients with aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement with corevalve prostheses compared to surgery with porcine or bovine biological prostheses. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):39-46. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew321.

  • Gronlykke L, Ihlemann N, Ngo AT, Thyregod HG, Kjaergaard J, Korshin A, Gustafsson F, Hassager C, Nilsson JC, Sondergaard L, Ravn HB. Measures of right ventricular function after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Feb 1;24(2):181-187. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw350.

  • Jorgensen TH, Thyregod HG, Tarp JB, Svendsen JH, Sondergaard L. Temporal changes of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients randomized to surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 1;234:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.098. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

  • Thyregod HGH, Ihlemann N, Jorgensen TH, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P, Chang Y, Franzen OW, Engstrom T, Clemmensen P, Hansen PB, Andersen LW, Steinbruuchel DA, Olsen PS, Sondergaard L. Five-Year Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes From the NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk. Circulation. 2019 Jun 11;139(24):2714-2723. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036606. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

  • Sondergaard L, Ihlemann N, Capodanno D, Jorgensen TH, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Chang Y, Steinbruchel DA, Olsen PS, Petronio AS, Thyregod HGH. Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 12;73(5):546-553. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.083.

  • Geisler BP, Jorgensen TH, Thyregod HGH, Pietzsch JB, Sondergaard L. Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at lower surgical risk: results from the NOTION trial. EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 6;15(11):e959-e967. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00847.

  • Jorgensen TH, Thyregod HGH, Ihlemann N, Nissen H, Petursson P, Kjeldsen BJ, Steinbruchel DA, Olsen PS, Sondergaard L. Eight-year outcomes for patients with aortic valve stenosis at low surgical risk randomized to transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 2021 Aug 7;42(30):2912-2919. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab375.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Valve Diseases

Interventions

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeProsthesis ImplantationThoracic Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Hans GH Thyregod, MD, PhD

    Dep. of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Lars Søndergaard, MD, DMSc

    Dep. of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2010

First Posted

January 27, 2010

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2033

Last Updated

November 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Locations