NCT01056302

Brief Summary

This study proposes to develop a computer-based software tool that will allow surgeons to plan and simulate surgery for patients with jaw trauma.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2011

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 22, 2010

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 26, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2011

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2016

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 7, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 7, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

January 22, 2010

Results QC Date

February 9, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Reconstructive surgical proceduresvisuohaptic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Deviation From Actual Surgical Outcome During Virtual Repair of Mandibular Fractures, Using the Novel Visuohaptic Computational Platform That Was Developed by the Investigators

    The virtual surgical outcome was compared to the actual surgical outcome. This was accomplished by measuring distances (mm) and angles between specific mandibular anatomic points in the virtual environment and comparing it to the same distances (mm) and angles between specific mandibular anatomic points in the actual surgical outcome, as seen in a 3D rendering derived from the patient's postoperative CT scan. The actual surgical repair was considered to be the gold standard. A deviation of more than 10% between the virtual surgical repair and the actual surgical repair was considered to be above threshold (inaccurate virtual fracture repair).

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Development and Evaluation of Automation Features for the Visuohaptic Virtual Surgery Planning Environment

    3 years

  • Implementation and Test of the Telemedicine Prototype

    3 years

Study Arms (1)

Group 1

15 patients who underwent surgical repair of mandibular fractures at San Francisco VA Medical Center

Procedure: Surgical repair of mandibular fractures

Interventions

Patients will undergo whatever needed surgical repair of maxillofacial trauma that is necessary. Records such as CT imaging and plaster models of the jaws will be utilized in the standard way to plan and carry out the surgery. The CT scan will also be used within the visuohaptic computational environment to develop and evaluate the user interface. The amount of time taken to work up and plan surgery using standard surgical practice and using the computational platform will be compared. Real surgical outcome will be compared to the simulated surgical outcome using the proposed software tool.

Group 1

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Study population will veterans who present to the Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic at the San Francisco VA Medical Center. The study will use pre-existing data from patients undergoing reconstructive facial surgery at the San Francisco VA with clinic indications that require preoperative CT scans and preoperative radiographs as well as model casts.

You may qualify if:

  • Craniofacial deformity, including post-traumatic, congenital or acquired deformity
  • Patients who have already have surgery because there was a clinical indication for surgical correction

You may not qualify if:

  • No craniofacial deformity
  • No clinical indication for surgical correction
  • Contraindication for surgical correction

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Medical Center, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94121, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Schvartzman SC, Silva R, Salisbury K, Gaudilliere D, Girod S. Computer-aided trauma simulation system with haptic feedback is easy and fast for oral-maxillofacial surgeons to learn and use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1984-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 24.

  • Forsslund J, Chan S, Selesnick J, Salisbury K, Silva RG, Blevins NH. The effect of haptic degrees of freedom on task performance in virtual surgical environments. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;184:129-35.

  • Girod S, Schvartzman SC, Gaudilliere D, Salisbury K, Silva R. Haptic feedback improves surgeons' user experience and fracture reduction in facial trauma simulation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(5):561-570. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.03.0043.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Maxillofacial Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Facial InjuriesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesWounds and Injuries

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Rebeka Silva
Organization
Department of Veterans Affairs

Study Officials

  • Rebeka Silva, DMD

    VA Medical Center, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2010

First Posted

January 26, 2010

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 7, 2020

Results First Posted

July 7, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations