Comparison Between Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for nasal intubation in patients with maxillofacial fractures regarding less bleeding to oral and nasal structures, quicker intubation times, increased success rates for first intubation attempts, fewer uses of the Magill forceps and the less need for cervical spine extension
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedFebruary 21, 2025
May 1, 2024
7 months
April 4, 2024
February 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of nasal and oropharyngeal bleeding
Incidence of nasal and oropharyngeal bleeding using Fromme's ordinal scale which is used for assessment of the surgical field quality( V Rajanigandha, et al. 2023),we will modify this scale to evaluate airway as follows : 0- No bleeding (virtually bloodless field) 1. Minimal bleeding ( not a nuisance to vision , no suctioning required) 2. Mild bleeding (a nuisance to vision but does not compromises laryngeal tube insertion, occasional suctioning required ) 3. Moderate bleeding (slightly compromises laryngeal tube insertion, frequent suctioning required) 4. Severe bleeding (significantly compromises laryngeal tube insertion, frequent suctioning required) 5. Massive bleeding (cannot insert laryngeal tube, constant suctioning required)
Through study completion, average 60 minutes at 5, 15, 30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time of successful intubation, defined as the time from removal of mask ventilation and beginning of bougie insertion until inflation of tube cuff
Within minutes
Overall rate of first trial success.
Within minutes
The use of magill forceps
Within minutes
Study Arms (2)
Group Ι Combined Video Laryngoscopy (VL) and Bougie
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup Ι Combined Video Laryngoscopy (VL) and Bougie: Nasal intubation will be performed using a video laryngoscope and a bougie.
Group ΙI Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) and Bougie :
ACTIVE COMPARATORNasal intubation will be performed using a traditional direct laryngoscope and a bougie.
Interventions
To compare combined video laryngoscopy and bougie versus direct laryngoscopy and bougie for nasal intubation.
To compare combined video laryngoscopy and bougie versus direct laryngoscopy and bougie for nasal intubation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who will undergo maxillofacial surgeries with nasotracheal intubation..
- ASA I/II patients.
- BMI \<35
You may not qualify if:
- Having bleeding diathesis and abnormal Prothrombin Time (PT), Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT), or platelet counts.
- Local causes of bleeding as adenoid
- On medications that alter blood coagulation as anticoagulants and antiplatlets.
- Patients in which either intubation failed on both nostrils or where intubation was only possible with a tube smaller than 6.0 mm internal diameter(ID).
- Anticipated difficult airways.
- ASA III/IV.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aswan Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Aswan University
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, 81528, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Nedrud SM, Baasch DG, Cabral JD, McEwen DS, Dasika J. Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Nasal Intubation. Cureus. 2021 Nov 11;13(11):e19482. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19482. eCollection 2021 Nov.
PMID: 34912623BACKGROUNDKumar P, Sharma J, Johar S, Singh V. Guiding Flexible-Tipped Bougie Under Videolaryngoscopy: An Alternative to Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation in Maxillofacial Surgeries. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Jun;19(2):324-326. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01327-w. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
PMID: 32346248BACKGROUNDPrasant MC, Kar S, Rastogi S, Hada P, Ali FM, Mudhol A. Comparative Study of Blood Loss, Quality of Surgical Field and Duration of Surgery in Maxillofacial Cases with and without Hypotensive Anesthesia. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Nov-Dec;6(6):18-21.
PMID: 25628477BACKGROUNDEldemrdash AM, Alazhary MA, Zaher ZZ, Hemaida TS, Yahia ME, Hammad SS. Comparison of Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2025 Jul 3;2025:7797828. doi: 10.1155/anrp/7797828. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40642178DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammed A Alazhary, MD
Aswan University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ayman M Eldemrdash, MD
Aswan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of anesthesia and surgical intensive care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2024
First Posted
April 26, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
February 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share