Establishing Effectiveness of Daily Co-trimoxazole Prophylaxis For Prevention of Malaria in Pregnancy
A Clinical Trial to Establish The Effectiveness of Daily Co-trimoxazole Prophylaxis For Prevention of Malaria in Pregnancy
1 other identifier
interventional
848
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Malaria is a major contributor of disease burden in Sub-Saharan Africa: 90% of global cases occur there, and pregnant women and children under 5 years are the most vulnerable. Malaria in pregnancy increases risks of abortion, stillbirth, prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation and maternal anemia, and is associated with higher risk of low birth weight and perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality. For prevention and control of malaria in pregnancy, the WHO recommends Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) with antimalarial drugs, insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and effective treatment of malaria and anemia. HIV in pregnancy increases the risks of malaria, and it seems that the efficacy of IPT with the drug sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is decreased in HIV+ pregnant women. Malaria prevention in pregnancy in Zambia relies on ITNs and IPT with SP. Daily prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole (CTX) effectively reduces mortality and morbidity in HIV+ individuals, and antibiotic therapy during pregnancy might help to decrease adverse pregnancy outcomes. CTX prophylaxis improves birth outcomes in HIV+ women with CD4\<200/µl: a study concluded that antenatal provision of CTX was beneficial for HIV+ pregnant women with low CD4 but not in women with ≥200/µl (however, this study was carried out in an area with very low risk of malaria , and CTX may have a different effect depending on endemic conditions). The WHO recommends daily CTX in addition to ARVs, to prevent opportunistic infections in all HIV+ patients. Concurrent administration of SP and CTX may increase the incidence of severe adverse reactions in HIV+ patients, so WHO has promoted CTX prophylaxis as an alternative to SP for the IPT in immuno-compromised pregnant women. Unfortunately, there is insufficient information on the effectiveness of daily CTX for preventing malaria infection in pregnancy: so, SP is still the only antimalarial recommended by WHO for this purpose. With the increase in SP resistance and with the newer antimalarials still being studied for safety and efficacy in pregnancy, CTX could be an alternative for SP in reducing malaria and malaria-related morbidity and mortality in pregnancy. This study will try to to see if in HIV- and HIV+ pregnant women, CTX is not inferior to SP in reducing placental parasitaemia. Such information is needed to issue updated, effective guidelines on malaria prevention in pregnancy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Sep 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedOctober 24, 2013
October 1, 2013
2.3 years
January 18, 2010
October 23, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To establish that in HIV negative pregnant women co-trimoxazole prophylaxis is non inferior to SP IPT with respect to birth weight at delivery (or within 24 hours). Non inferiority is defined as a difference in mean birth weights of no more than 100g.
Up to the end of pregancy
Secondary Outcomes (4)
To evaluate the effectiveness of co-trimoxazole prophylaxis and SP IPT in reducing placenta malaria in HIV+ pregnant women with CD4 ≥ 350/µl and in the combined group of HIV- and HIV+ pregnant women with CD4 ≥ 350/µl
Up to the end of pregnancy
To evaluate the effectiveness of CTX and SP IPT in reducing malaria peripheral infection, in HIV negative, and in HIV positive pregnant women with a CD4 cell count ≥ 350/µl
Up to the end of pregnancy
To evaluate the effect of CTX and SP IPT on the offspring by measuring the gestational age at delivery, perinatal mortality and birth weight, in HIV negative pregnant women and in HIV positive pregnant women with a CD4 cell count ≥ 350/µl
At delivery
To compare the effectiveness and safety profiles of CTX prophylaxis to that of SP IPT, in HIV negative pregnant women and in HIV positive pregnant women with a CD4 cell count ≥ 350/µl
Up to the end of pregancy
Study Arms (5)
CTX in HIV-negative women
EXPERIMENTALCTX daily prophylaxis in HIV-negative pregnant women
CTX in HIV-positive women
EXPERIMENTALCTX daily prophylaxis in pregnant women who are infected with HIV
SP IPT in HIV-negative women
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntermittent Preventive Treatment with SP in HIV-negative pregnant women
IPT SP in HIV-positive women
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntermittent Preventive Treatment with SP in HIV-positive pregnant women
CTX in HIV-positive pregnant women with CD4<350
ACTIVE COMPARATORDaily prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole in HIV-positive pregnant women with CD4\<350
Interventions
Daily prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole
Intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed pregnancy (through palpable fundus and/ or positive pregnancy test)
- Gestational age between 16 and 28 weeks
- Hb \> 7 g/dl, by Hemocue
- No symptoms consistent with malaria
- Residence within the health facility catchment's area
- Willingness to deliver at the health facility
- Willingness to adhere to all requirements of the study (including HIV-1 voluntary counselling and testing)
- Ability to provide written informed consent. If the woman is a minor of age/not emancipated, the consent must be given by a parent or legal guardian according to national law (however, in this case, also the minor woman will sign the consent form, to document that she is freely giving her assent to take part in the study).
You may not qualify if:
- History of allergy to study drugs, or previous history of allergy to sulpha drugs
- History or presence of major illnesses likely to influence pregnancy outcome including diabetes mellitus, severe renal or heart disease, or active tuberculosis
- Any significant illness at the time of screening that requires hospitalization
- Intent to move out of the study's catchment area before delivery or deliver at relative's home out of the catchment's area;
- Prior enrolment in the study or concurrent enrolment in another study
- Severe anaemia (Hb\<7 g/dl)
- Previous history of unfavourable pregnancy outcome: pre-eclampsia, caesarean section, stillbirth.
- Eligible HIV-positive women who, following the National guidelines, have to be put on CTX prophylaxis (e.g. having a CD4 count \<350/µl) or already on CTX and/or ARV treatment will be excluded from the RCT but included in a prospective observational cohort and receive 2 tablets of CTX daily
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kabuta Health Centre
Kabuta, Nchelenge District, Luapula Province of, Zambia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christine Manyando, MD
Tropical Diseases Research Centre, Zambia
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Umberto D'Alessandro, MD, PhD
Insitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2010
First Posted
January 21, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 24, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10