NCT01047306

Brief Summary

The purpose is to evaluate the course of disease progression in MPS IIIA patients who are untreated to identify potential surrogate endpoints that may be utilized in future ERT trials of MPS IIIA via defined assessments including standardized clinical, biochemical, neurocognitive, behavioral, developmental, and imaging measures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2010

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 11, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 12, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 15, 2010

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 10, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 10, 2013

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 30, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

January 11, 2010

Results QC Date

February 9, 2015

Last Update Submit

May 19, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III/Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II (BSID-III/KABC-II) Age-Equivalent Scores

    Children 1 year-42 months were assessed by the BSID-III; those \>42 months and with a developmental age of \>42 months by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II (VABS-II) were evaluated with the KABC-II. For children \>42 months, but \<42 months in developmental age, and those unable to complete at least 3 cognitive KABC-II subtests, the BSID-III was used. The BSID-III is a series of measurements to assess the motor, language, and cognitive development of infants and toddlers and consists of a series of developmental play tasks. The KABC-II is an individually administered measure of processing/reasoning abilities. Raw scores were converted to age- equivalent scores to measure ability, skill, and knowledge, expressed as the age at which most individuals reach the same level (age norm; range: 0, unbound ). A positive value indicates improvement. The BSID-III and KABC-II age- equivalent scores were based on the cognitive domain and average non-verbal age-equivalent score, respectively.

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and End of Study (Month 24 assessment or early termination)

  • Change From Baseline in BSID-III/KABC-II Developmental Quotient (DQ) Scores

    The determination of whether a patient received BSID-III was based on an algorithm that includes the patient's calendar age and VABS-II age -equivalent score (See Outcome 1). The BSID-III is a series of measurements to assess the motor (fine and gross), language (receptive and expressive), and cognitive development of infants and toddlers and consists of a series of developmental play tasks. The KABC-II is an individually administered measure of processing and reasoning abilities. The DQ is a means to express a neurodevelopmental/cognitive delay. The DQ was computed as a ratio and expressed as a percentage using the age-equivalent score divided by the age at testing (\[age-equivalent score/chronological age\] Ă— 100; range: 0, 100). The BSID-III DQ score is based on the cognitive domain. The DQ score for KABC-II is calculated from the average non-verbal age-equivalent score. A positive value indicates improvement in health and cognition.

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and End of Study (Month 24 assessment or early termination)

  • Change From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II (VABS-II) Age-equivalent Scores

    The VABS-II test measures adaptive behaviors, including the ability to cope with environmental changes, to learn new everyday skills, and to demonstrate independence. It is an instrument that supports the diagnosis of intellectual and developmental disabilities in patients from birth to 90 years. This test measures the following 5 key domains: communication, daily living skills, socialization, motor skills, and the adaptive behavior composite (a composite of the other 4 domains). The mean age-equivalent score is obtained by averaging out the age-equivalent scores for the all the sub-domains except for Gross and Fine motor skills (range: 0, unbound). A positive value indicates improvement in health and cognition

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and End of Study (Month 24 assessment or early termination)

  • Change From Baseline in VABS-II Overall DQ Scores

    The VABS-II test measures adaptive behaviors, including the ability to cope with environmental changes, to learn new everyday skills, and to demonstrate independence. It is an instrument that supports the diagnosis of intellectual and developmental disabilities in patients from birth to 90 years. This test measures the following 5 key domains: communication, daily living skills, socialization, motor skills, and the adaptive behavior composite (a composite of the other 4 domains). The DQ is a means to express a neurodevelopmental/cognitive delay. The DQ was computed as a ratio and expressed as a percentage using the age-equivalent score divided by the age at testing (\[age-equivalent score/chronological age\] Ă— 100; range, 0, 100). The overall DQ score is calculated from the mean age-equivalent score obtained by averaging out the age-equivalent scores for the all the sub-domains except for Gross and Fine motor skills. A positive value indicates improvement in health and cognition.

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and End of Study (Month 24 assessment or early termination)

Secondary Outcomes (22)

  • Change From Baseline Values in Gray Matter Volume Assessed by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and End of Study (Month 24 assessment or early termination)

  • Change From Baseline in The Total Disability Score (TDS) of The Four Point Scoring System (FPSS)

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and End of Study (Month 24 assessment or early termination)

  • Percent of Participants With an Abnormal Overall Test Result of Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) at Baseline

    Baseline

  • Percent of Participants With an Abnormal Overall Test Result of Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) at 6 Months

    6 months

  • Percent of Participants With an Abnormal Overall Test Result of Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) at 12 Months

    12 months

  • +17 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Change From Baseline in Urine Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) Levels

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and End of Study (Month 24 assessment or early termination)

  • Change From Baseline in Total Tau Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and End of Study (Month 24 assessment or early termination)

  • Change From Baseline in Phosphorylated Tau Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and End of Study (Month 24 assessment or early termination)

Study Arms (1)

No Treatment

This is a longitudinal, prospective, observational, natural history study of patients with MPS IIIA to identify potential surrogate endpoints for future ERT trials via standardized clinical, biochemical, neurocognitive, developmental, behavioral and imaging measures.

Other: assessment

Interventions

Physical, developmental, neurological, behavioral, and neurocognitive assessments

No Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Initial patient eligibility is based on patient age and on a confirmed diagnosis of MPS IIIA by biochemical enzyme assay.

You may qualify if:

  • a. Documented deficiency in HNS enzyme activity of less than or equal to 10% of the lower limit of the normal range as measured in fibroblasts or leukocytes (based on normal range for diagnosis of MPS IIIA by a laboratory that is acceptable to Shire HGT).
  • AND
  • b. Normal enzyme activity level of at least one other sulfatase (to rule out multiple sulfatase deficiency) as measured in fibroblasts or leukocytes (based on normal range by a laboratory that is acceptable to Shire HGT).
  • Patient is greater than or equal to 1 year of age and developmental age greater than or equal to 1 year.
  • \. Patient is medically stable to accommodate the protocol requirements, including travel and assessments, without placing an undue burden on the patient/patient's family.
  • \. Voluntarily signed an IRB/IEC-approved informed consent (assent if applicable) form. The patient's, patient's parents or legally authorized representative(s) consent and patient's assent as appropriate, must be obtained.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient has significant non-MPS IIIA-related CNS impairment or behavioral disturbances, which would confound the scientific integrity or interpretation of study assessments, as determined by the investigator.
  • Patients who, for MPS IIIA behavioral-related reasons,in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude performance of study neurocognitive and developmental testing procedures.
  • Patients who are pregnant, breast feeding, or female patients of childbearing potential, who will not or cannot comply with the use of an acceptable method of birth control such as condoms, barrier method, oral contraception, etc.
  • Patient is blind and/or deaf.
  • Patient has any known or suspected hypersensitivity to anesthesia or is thought to be at an unacceptably high risk for anesthesia due to airway compromise or other conditions.
  • Patient or patient family history of neuroleptic malignant syndrome, malignant hyperthermia, or other anesthesia-related concerns.
  • The Investigator may choose to exclude patients who have had complications resulting from prior lumbar punctures.
  • Patient history of poorly controlled seizure disorder.
  • Patient history of an intracranial pressure (ICP) or opening CSF pressure upon lumbar puncture that exceeds 30 cm water that has not been definitively treated.
  • Patient is currently receiving psychotropic or other medications which in the investigator's opinion, would be likely to substantially confound test results.
  • Patient cannot sustain absence from aspirin, non-steroidals, or medications that affect blood clotting within 1 week prior to a relevant study related procedure (eg, lumbar puncture if applicable), or has ingested such medications within 1 week before any procedures in which any change in clotting activity would be deleterious.
  • Patient has received treatment with any investigational drug or device intended as a treatment for MPS IIIA within the 30 days prior to, or during the study, or is currently enrolled in another study that involves an investigational drug or device (enrollment through Safety follow-up contact).
  • Patient has received a hematopoietic stem cell or bone marrow transplant.
  • Patient's assent is unattainable, or the patient's parent(s), or patient's legally authorized representative(s) is/are unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study, or do/does not agree to comply with the protocol defined schedule of assessments.
  • The patient has any item (braces, tattoos, etc.) which would exclude the patient from being able to undergo MRI according to local Institutional Policy, or the patient has any other situation that would exclude the patient from undergoing any other procedure required in this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Cingi EC, Beebe DS, Whitley CB, Belani KG. Anesthetic care and perioperative complications in children with Sanfilipo Syndrome Type A. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 May;26(5):531-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12876. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

  • Shapiro EG, Nestrasil I, Delaney KA, Rudser K, Kovac V, Nair N, Richard CW 3rd, Haslett P, Whitley CB. A Prospective Natural History Study of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA. J Pediatr. 2016 Mar;170:278-87.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.11.079. Epub 2016 Jan 16.

  • Shapiro EG, Nestrasil I, Ahmed A, Wey A, Rudser KR, Delaney KA, Rumsey RK, Haslett PA, Whitley CB, Potegal M. Quantifying behaviors of children with Sanfilippo syndrome: the Sanfilippo Behavior Rating Scale. Mol Genet Metab. 2015 Apr;114(4):594-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

  • Rumsey RK, Rudser K, Delaney K, Potegal M, Whitley CB, Shapiro E. Acquired autistic behaviors in children with mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA. J Pediatr. 2014 May;164(5):1147-1151.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

CSF, urine and serum

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mucopolysaccharidosis III

Interventions

Restraint, Physical

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MucopolysaccharidosesCarbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesLysosomal Storage DiseasesMucinosesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior ControlTherapeuticsImmobilizationInvestigative Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Shire

Study Officials

  • Study Director

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2010

First Posted

January 12, 2010

Study Start

February 15, 2010

Primary Completion

July 10, 2013

Study Completion

July 10, 2013

Last Updated

June 11, 2021

Results First Posted

March 30, 2016

Record last verified: 2021-05

Locations