Comparison Between Main Branch and Side Branch Vessels
Comparison of Clinical, Electrical and Physiologic Significance Between Main Branch and Side Branch Vessels
1 other identifier
observational
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is
- 1.to compare the clinical significance of the main vessel and the side branch vessel using EKG, pain score and coronary wedge pressure
- 2.to develop a new scoring system to predict the clinical significance of a side branch
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedAugust 22, 2011
August 1, 2011
1.9 years
January 8, 2010
August 18, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ST elevation during 1min balloon occlusion
Day 1 after PCI
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain score during 1min balloon occlusion
Day 1 after PCI
coronary wedge pressure
during the procedure
Usefulness of new scoring system
During the procedure
Study Arms (1)
Main vessel, side branch vessel
Interventions
Measuring collateral flow using pressure and/or velocity coronary wire
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with significant coronary artery disease, involving the bifurcation lesions
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18
- Able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits of receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for true bifurcation lesions, and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure
- Significant stenosis at bifurcation lesion (\>50% by visual estimate) which always includes stenosis of side branch (true bifurcation)
- Target main branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm. Target side branch lesion(s) in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.25 mm
- Target lesion(s) amenable for PCI with final kissing balloon angioplasty for the side branch
You may not qualify if:
- Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment)
- Patients refuse to give informed consent
- Patients with left main coronary artery stenosis
- Patients with total occlusion of the bifurcation lesion
- Patients with infarct-related artery at the lesion of interest
- Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction\<40%
- Patients with primary cardiomyopathy
- Patients with chronic kidney disease defined as serum Cr\>2.0
- Patients who have severe side effects or contraindication to adenosine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
Related Publications (5)
Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Kim HS, Sohn DW, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB, Choi YS, Tahk SJ. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 16;46(4):633-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.054.
PMID: 16098427BACKGROUNDPijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1354-67. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1354.
PMID: 8462157BACKGROUNDPijls NH, Bech GJ, el Gamal MI, Bonnier HJ, De Bruyne B, Van Gelder B, Michels HR, Koolen JJ. Quantification of recruitable coronary collateral blood flow in conscious humans and its potential to predict future ischemic events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jun;25(7):1522-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00111-g.
PMID: 7759702BACKGROUNDBillinger M, Kloos P, Eberli FR, Windecker S, Meier B, Seiler C. Physiologically assessed coronary collateral flow and adverse cardiac ischemic events: a follow-up study in 403 patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov 6;40(9):1545-50. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02378-1.
PMID: 12427404BACKGROUNDKoo BK, Lee SP, Lee JH, Park KW, Suh JW, Cho YS, Chung WY, Doh JH, Nam CW, Yu CW, Lee BK, Vassilev D, Gil R, Lim HS, Tahk SJ, Kim HS. Assessment of clinical, electrocardiographic, and physiological relevance of diagonal branch in left anterior descending coronary artery bifurcation lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov;5(11):1126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.018.
PMID: 23174636DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2010
First Posted
January 12, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 22, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-08