Study Stopped
The study was never initiated
Safety Study of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Started One Week After Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma
Phase II Study of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Started One Week After Laparoscopic
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We believe that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for cancer allows quicker recovery and significantly reduces the chances of postoperative wound breakdown. This will shorten the wait time required to begin adjuvant therapy to one week after surgery thereby combating the micrometastasis unseen at the time of surgery. Prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancer will therefore improve along with decreasing the incidence of locoregional recurrence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2010
CompletedOctober 6, 2016
October 1, 2016
December 9, 2009
October 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine if it is safe to administer gemcitabine to patients with pancreatic cancer one week after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To determine the if the 1-year survival in patients with pancreatic cancer is improved with administration of gemcitabine one week following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Patients with distal pancreatic cancer
EXPERIMENTALPatients with distal pancreatic cancer amenable to a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Interventions
Six cycles of Gemcitabine will be given. Each cycle of Gemcitabine comprises of Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 as a 30 minute infusion once weekly for 3 weeks with a fourth week off.
Laparoscopic resection of the distal pancreas
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients older than 18 with clinical diagnosis of distal pancreas adenocarcinoma
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with T4 or M1 disease, R2 resection margin, preoperative therapy, or if adjuvant therapy status was unknown.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231, United States
Related Publications (3)
Crane CH, Abbruzzese JL, Evans DB, Wolff RA, Ballo MT, Delclos M, Milas L, Mason K, Charnsangavej C, Pisters PW, Lee JE, Lenzi R, Vauthey JN, Wong AB, Phan T, Nguyen Q, Janjan NA. Is the therapeutic index better with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation than with 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Apr 1;52(5):1293-302. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02740-7.
PMID: 11955742BACKGROUNDKachnic LA, Shaw JE, Manning MA, Lauve AD, Neifeld JP. Gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil for nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Cancer. 2001 Apr 20;96(2):132-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1008.
PMID: 11291097BACKGROUNDRegine WF, Winter KA, Abrams RA, Safran H, Hoffman JP, Konski A, Benson AB, Macdonald JS, Kudrimoti MR, Fromm ML, Haddock MG, Schaefer P, Willett CG, Rich TA. Fluorouracil vs gemcitabine chemotherapy before and after fluorouracil-based chemoradiation following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Mar 5;299(9):1019-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1019.
PMID: 18319412BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin A Makary, MD, MPH
Johns Hopkins University Department of Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2009
First Posted
January 11, 2010
Last Updated
October 6, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10