Sedation in Patients at Risk for Upper Airway Collapse
2 other identifiers
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Overview of Protocol: Between Subject - Repeated Measures design will be used to assess the airway response of two groups of subjects under two different sedated conditions. Each group will be comprised of six subjects and will be categorized according to their baseline profile for risk for SDB (\< 10 RDI or \> 25 RDI). Some subjects will have been prescribed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy by their treating physician as a result of their overnight sleep study. CPAP treatment is effective in splinting the airway open and thus decreasing the incident of airway collapse during sleep. Thus, CPAP utilization will also be tracked as an independent and continuous variable as regular CPAP use has been found to be associated with increased resistance to UAC (upper airway collapse). The experimental conditions will evaluate upper airway patency and instability in response to two forms of intravenous sedation: propofol and dexmedetomidine. Subjects will be continuously monitored during each experimental condition for respiratory effort and flow, and for EEG, EMG, and ECG. Respiratory instability will first be assessed while subjects are under sedation without any airway provocation. The degree of respiratory instability will be quantified in terms of the following measurements: a modified Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDIsedated), respiratory arousals, and minute ventilation. The apneic periods will be classified by their mixture of central and obstructive components.All outcome measurements are assessed over the period of sedation which last for approximately one hour. Upper airway patency will be quantified in terms of the critical pharyngeal pressure (Pcrit) (the pressure beyond which complete upper airway collapse occurs, see background).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 27, 2015
CompletedApril 27, 2015
April 1, 2015
1.8 years
December 11, 2009
April 7, 2014
April 24, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Respiratory Disturbance Index
respiratory events (apneas, hypopneas) per hour
during infusion of study drugs
Study Arms (2)
Propofol
OTHERIs an alkylphenol, is primarily indicated for use as a general anesthetic and has minimal analgesic properties.
Dexmedetomidine
OTHERDexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist that has sedative, hypnotic, and analgesic effects.
Interventions
For propofol, the current study will employ the Marsh parameters, with an initial effect site target concentration of 1.0 mcg/ml, a level likely to produce only mild sedation. Though our patient population is expected to be predominantly obese, a previous pharmacokinetic study has validated that constant infusions utilizing the dosing scheme of mcg-1•kg-1•min will yield similar effect site concentrations.25 The effect site target will be increased in increments approximately every five minutes until the pharmacodynamic targets defined in the study are attained.
For dexmedetomidine, an intravenous loading dose of 0.5 mcg/kg will be infused over 10 minutes and followed by an infusion starting at 0.5 mcg/kg/hr. This infusion will be titrated up to a maximum of 1.2 mcg/kg/hr.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with mild or no Sleep disorder breathing
- Patients with moderate to severe Sleep disorder breathing
You may not qualify if:
- No unstable medical conditions
- Anatomic pathology of airway
- Pregnancy or nursing
- Inability to fit an anesthesia facemask
- Excessive alcohol or drug abuse
- Bleeding abnormalities
- Claustrophobia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Suzanne Karan
- Organization
- University of Rochester Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suzanne B Karan, Medical
University of Rochester
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Denham Ward, Medical
University of Rochester
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2009
First Posted
January 8, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 27, 2015
Results First Posted
April 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04