Auto Bilevel Adherence Following a Poor Initial Encounter With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
BiPAPRescue
Phase IV Study of Bi-Level Positive Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)Compared to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The primary objective outcome is the proportion of participants compliant (at least four hours of use per night for all nights) in the Auto Bilevel group compared to the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) group after 90 days of treatment during the investigation. Proportion will be calculated using the cumulative number of hours on therapy divided by the total number of days of the investigation for each participant. The mean and standard deviation of these mean therapy hours will then be calculated for each arm of the investigation. Participants with compliance of at least four hours will be classified as "compliant" and those with less than four hours will be classified as "non-compliant". The null hypothesis will be rejected if the mean of the primary objective outcome for all participants in the BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex® therapy (auto Bilevel) arm is significantly greater than that for all participants in the CPAP therapy arm
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2007
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 26, 2019
CompletedApril 26, 2019
April 1, 2019
1.4 years
July 18, 2011
January 22, 2019
April 25, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group Measured by Average Nightly Use.
Compliance was compared between the AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring the average use per night over the study period.
90 days
Percentage of Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group
Percentage of Group Compliance was compared between AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring proportion of adherent users over the treatment period. Patients with compliance of at least four hours will be classified as "compliant" and those with less than four hours will be classified as "non-compliant". The % of compliant patients will be calculated using the cumulative number of hours on therapy divided by the total number of days of the investigation for each subject.
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Fatigue Severity Scale
Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Quality
Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Study Arms (2)
Auto BiLevel Group
EXPERIMENTALAuto Bilevel; auto-titrating bilevel positive airway pressure device with pressure flexing used as experimental treatment for obstructive sleep apnea
CPAP Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORCPAP; continuous positive airway pressure used as comparator treatment for obstructive sleep apnea
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Participation in another interventional research study within the last 30 days
- Major uncontrolled medical or psychiatric condition such as congestive heart failure, neuromuscular disease, renal failure etc.
- Prior CPAP or Bi-Level PAP use (within last 2 years)
- Chronic respiratory failure or insufficiency, moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (FEV1 \< 60%), or any known condition of an elevation of arterial carbon dioxide levels while awake
- Surgery of the upper airway, nose, sinus, or middle ear within the previous 90 days
- Presence of an untreated, diagnosable, non-OSA related sleep disorder (e.g. restless legs syndrome, insomnia, etc.)
- Periodic Limb movement arousal index of 10 or greater.
- Refusal to consider further interventions to standard CPAP to optimize positive pressure therapy (e.g. different mask than what was used in lab)
- PAP therapy otherwise medically complicated or contraindicated such as those with a difficult to size or adjust interface (mask) resulting in facial pain, skin irritation or trauma, or excessive air leaks
- Shift workers or people experiencing jet lag
- Known history of alcohol and or drug abuse
- Diagnosis of Complex Sleep Apnea, (appears to be classic obstructive or mixed sleep apnea, but exhibits disruptive central apneas and periodic breathing on CPAP) 11, 12 or persistent central apnea during diagnostic PSG.
- Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Chronic Hypnotic use (nightly use for three months or less)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Philips Respironicslead
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
- Brigham and Women's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Mayo Clinics
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Clayton Sleep Institute
St Louis, Missouri, 63143, United States
Related Publications (1)
Powell ED, Gay PC, Ojile JM, Litinski M, Malhotra A. A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Feb 15;8(1):43-7. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1658.
PMID: 22334808RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Eric Powell, Ph.D.
- Organization
- Sleep Therapy & Research Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Powell, Ph.D.
Philips Respironics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2011
First Posted
August 13, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 26, 2019
Results First Posted
April 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04