Trial in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT): Right Ventricular Apex Versus High Posterior Septum
Echocardiographic Dyssynchrony in Heart Failure in CRT; Right Ventricular Apex v.s. High Posterior Septum
1 other identifier
interventional
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In heart failure patients we hypothesised that right ventricular high posterior septum is superior to right ventricular apex in CRT and DDD pacemaker. In two separate trials we prospectively randomized the right ventricular lead placement to find evidence of differences in heart failure symptoms (NYHA-class), 6 minute hall walk and echocardiographic measurements of reverse remodelling and dyssynchrony.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 heart-failure
Started Jan 2009
Typical duration for phase_2 heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedMay 24, 2011
May 1, 2011
3.4 years
December 17, 2009
May 23, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Echocardiographic reverse remodelling and dyssynchrony
3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Study Arms (2)
CRT; RV apical lead placement
ACTIVE COMPARATORRight ventricular apical lead placement in CRT
CRT; RV high posterior septum
ACTIVE COMPARATORHigh posterior septal lead placement in CRT
Interventions
RV lead is randomized to either apex or high posterior septum
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- CRT:
- LVEF \< 35%
- LVEDD \> 5.5 cm
- NYHA 3-4
- QRS \> 120 ms
- Optimal medical treatment
- Both CRT-pacemakers (CRT-P) and CRT combined with ICD (CRT-D)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, 5021, Norway
Related Publications (3)
Kristiansen HM, Vollan G, Hovstad T, Keilegavlen H, Faerestrand S. The impact of left ventricular lead position on left ventricular reverse remodelling and improvement in mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Dec;13(12):991-1000. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes114. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
PMID: 22677455DERIVEDKristiansen HM, Hovstad T, Vollan G, Keilegavlen H, Faerestrand S. Clinical implication of right ventricular to left ventricular interlead sensed electrical delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2012 Jul;14(7):986-93. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur429. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
PMID: 22308084DERIVEDKristiansen HM, Vollan G, Hovstad T, Keilegavlen H, Faerestrand S. A randomized study of haemodynamic effects and left ventricular dyssynchrony in right ventricular apical vs. high posterior septal pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 May;14(5):506-16. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr162. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
PMID: 22286156DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Svein Faerestrand, MD, PhD
Faerestrand S
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2009
First Posted
December 18, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 24, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-05