Study Stopped
Insufficient Recruitment. Findings of concurrent study in low risk population not supportive of hypotheses in this study.
CMAC® Versus Airtraq® and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Tracheal Intubation.
Comparison of the CMAC® Device to the Airtraq® and the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Anatomical Characteristics Predictive of Difficult Tracheal Intubation.
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is essential that anaesthetists successfully perform orotracheal intubation in scenarios in which intubation is potentially more difficult, such as where anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation are present. The CMAC® Laryngoscope is a new intubating device. It is designed to provide a view of the glottis without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes. The CMAC may be especially effective in situations where intubation of the trachea is potentially difficult. The efficacy of this device in comparison to the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope and other novel laryngoscopes is not known. We aim to compare its performance to that of the Macintosh laryngoscope, the gold standard device, in patients with one or more anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation. The investigators further aim to compare it to the Airtraq® device a device which has been shown to be superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope in previous trials. The investigators primary hypothesis is that, in the hands of experienced anaesthetists, time to intubation would be shorter using the CMAC than using the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with two or more anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation. The investigators further hypothesize that the Airtraq® will be superior the CMAC® with one or more anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedJune 19, 2012
June 1, 2012
1.2 years
December 14, 2009
June 17, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of successful placement of Tube in the Trachea
immediately
Secondary Outcomes (3)
1. Duration of Intubation attempt (successful Attempts only) a. Absolute time taken to perform successful tracheal intubation b. Number of successful intubations completed within 30 seconds
immediately
2. Tracheal Intubation attempts. a. Overall number of attempts at Intubation. b. Number of successful intubations on first attempt
immediately
3. Laryngeal View Obtained c. Cormac and Lehane Grading of Best Laryngeal View d. Change in view compared to initial assessment by independent anaesthetist. e. POGO score.
immediately
Study Arms (3)
macintosh
ACTIVE COMPARATORC-MAC
ACTIVE COMPARATORAirtraq
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA 1-3 patients undergoing surgical procedures requiring orotracheal intubation.
- Written informed Consent
- No relevant drug allergies
- Patients with 2 or more of the following predictors of difficult intubation:
- Mallampatti II - IV
- Thyromental distance \< 6cm
- Mouth opening \< 3.5 cm
- Cervical spine disease
- Anteriorly protruding incisors
- Presence of Caps or Crowns
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with history of or risk factors for gastric regurgitation
- Patients unable to consent for the trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Galway University Hospital
Galway, Galway, Ireland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anaesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2009
First Posted
December 15, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 19, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06