NCT01027572

Brief Summary

Rationale. The investigators hypothesize that bilateral electrical central thalamic stimulation of patients in Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State from at least 6 months could improve the level of responsiveness. Aims. Evaluate the efficacy of bilateral electrical central thalamic stimulation in patients in Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State. Study Design. Patients in Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State from at least 6 months because of traumatic brain injury, hypoxic or ischemic brain injury will be evaluated to confirm the diagnosis according to the recent literature criteria. Then patients will be investigated by magnetic resonance (MRI), EEG and evoked potentials to evaluate eligibility. Patients included into the study will be implanted with electrodes, targeting the centromedian/parafascicularis nucleus complex of the thalamus bilaterally. In the following months patients will be repeatedly evaluated using the CRS-R and Coma/Near Coma scales and the neurophysiologic parameters (EEG, evoked potentials) to assess the effects of thalamic stimulation. fMRI,DTI and MRS will be performed prior and after thalamic stimulation.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2009

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2009

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2011

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

June 27, 2011

Status Verified

June 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 1, 2009

Last Update Submit

June 24, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

Vegetative stateMinimally conscious stateThalamic stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy of thalamic stimulation evaluated by the administration of the CRS-R and Coma/Near Coma scales and comparing the results obtained with those of the pre-implant evaluation.

    1, 6, 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in the length of desynchronization performed by continuous EEG recording and spectral analysis. Evaluate which patients in Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State can benefit from central thalamic stimulation.

    1, 6, 12 months

Study Arms (1)

Thalamic stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in Vegetative or Minimally Conscious State

Device: Implantable neurostimulation system (Medtronic)

Interventions

Thalamic stimulation will be performed using an implantable neurostimulation system

Thalamic stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female patients stably in VS or MCS from at least 6 months, 10 to 65 years old.
  • Patients must fulfil the neuroimaging criteria described later
  • Patients must fulfil neurophysiologic criteria as described later

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to provide the informed consent by the legal representative
  • Age \< 10 years and \> 65 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Expected life span \< 1 year
  • Presence of infectious disease not treatable
  • Brain pathology not correlated with VS or MCS
  • Thalamus: bilateral absence of damage of the centromedian/parafascicularis complex and of the entire area of the intralaminar nuclei. The remaining structures of the thalami should not be damaged for an extent greater than 40% of the total volume of the two thalami.
  • Frontal lobes: at least one lobe should not be damaged to an extent superior to 20% of the volume. Absence of lesion of the Broca's area in the left (or dominant) hemisphere.
  • Temporal lobes: absence of damage to the posterior two third of the left or dominant temporal lobe. The extent of the lesions in the remaining structures of the temporal lobes should be less than 70% of the total volume of the lobes.
  • Parietal lobes: lesion volume in at least one parietal lobe should be less than 30%.
  • Occipital lobes: lesion volume in at least one occipital lobe should be less than 30%. The visual cortex should be spared in at least one lobe.
  • Hypothalamus: absence of lesions. Mesencephalon: absence of lesions in the region located between the substantia nigra and the bases of the colliculi. Unilateral lesions ventral to the substantia nigra are permitted.
  • Pons: absence of lesions unless unilateral and limited to the ventral third of the pons.
  • Cerebellum: Absence of lesions larger than 80% of the total volume; the deep nuclei of at least one side of the cerebellum should be intact.
  • Medulla: absence of lesions unless limited to one pyramid. Cervical spinal cord: absence of lesions All patients should be free from hydrocephalus or the hydrocephalus should be treated with a shunt prior to thalamic implant.
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Istituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare - CNR

Milan, Italy

RECRUITING

Fondazione IRCCS "Casimiro Mondino"

Pavia, 27100, Italy

RECRUITING

Fondazione IRCCS "Salvatore Maugeri"

Pavia, 27100, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Schiff ND, Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Victor JD, Baker K, Gerber M, Fritz B, Eisenberg B, Biondi T, O'Connor J, Kobylarz EJ, Farris S, Machado A, McCagg C, Plum F, Fins JJ, Rezai AR. Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature. 2007 Aug 2;448(7153):600-3. doi: 10.1038/nature06041.

    PMID: 17671503BACKGROUND
  • Lombardi F, Gatta G, Sacco S, Muratori A, Carolei A. The Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Funct Neurol. 2007 Jan-Apr;22(1):47-61.

    PMID: 17509244BACKGROUND
  • Yamamoto T, Kobayashi K, Kasai M, Oshima H, Fukaya C, Katayama Y. DBS therapy for the vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;93:101-4. doi: 10.1007/3-211-27577-0_17.

    PMID: 15986737BACKGROUND
  • Magrassi L, Maggioni G, Pistarini C, Di Perri C, Bastianello S, Zippo AG, Iotti GA, Biella GE, Imberti R. Results of a prospective study (CATS) on the effects of thalamic stimulation in minimally conscious and vegetative state patients. J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;125(4):972-981. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS15700. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Persistent Vegetative State

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesUnconsciousnessConsciousness DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Roberto Imberti, MD

    Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo - Pavia - Italy

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Lorenzo Magrassi, MD

    Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia and University of Pavia - Italy

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Roberto Imberti, MD

CONTACT

Lorenzo Magrassi, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2009

First Posted

December 8, 2009

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

July 1, 2011

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

June 27, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-06

Locations