NCT01027442

Brief Summary

Introduction: The use stereolithographic (SLA) guides may provide significant benefits in simultaneous placement of multiple implants, especially in large edentulous areas lacking anatomic landmarks for surgical reference. Planning of the implant positions prior to surgery may shorten the duration of the surgery spent by exploring and determining the suitable implant location on the edentulous alveolar crest in the standard technique . Previous studies have demonstrated the use of many SLA guide in this manner, however; most were designed to be used as placed on the alveolar crest (bone-supported) following a flap exposure, and there was no depth-control of the osteotomy drills. Further advances in stereolithography allowed flapless surgeries to be performed via mucosa-supported guides (Rosenfeld, et al. 2006c, Tardieu, et al. 2007). The use of these guides eliminates not only the time required for incision and flap exposure but post-operative patient morbidity and discomfort may also be reduced, due to the non-invasive nature of the procedure. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy, surgical and post-operative complications and post-loading outcomes of implants placed by the conventional and aforementioned computer-aided methods.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2008

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2008

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2009

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 7, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

November 27, 2013

Status Verified

June 1, 2007

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

December 7, 2009

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

StereolithographyDental implants,Prostheticspositioning-errorslogistic regression analysis

Study Arms (2)

Conventional implant placement method

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The patients in ths group will be treated by conventional, "free-hand" implant placement

Device: Dental Implants

Computer-guidedimplant placement

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this group, the patients will be treated by implants placed via computer generated SLA guides

Device: Mucosa-supported single-type guidesDevice: Bone-supported guides

Interventions

Compute generated Mucosa-supported single-type guides

Also known as: Simplant, SAFEsystem, Materialise Dental, Leuven , Belgium
Computer-guidedimplant placement

Computer generated, Multiple type Bone-supported guides

Also known as: Aytasarim, Classic. Odtu-Kosgep, Ankara, Turkey
Computer-guidedimplant placement

Dental implants placed via conventional free-hand method

Also known as: Thommen Medical SPI, Waldenburg, Switzerland, Frident Xixe, dentsply Friadent-Turkey
Conventional implant placement method

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy patient with at leat one edentuşous jaw

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with at least one edentulous jaw with healthy systemic and oral status without severe alveolar bone athrophy, major alveolar hard and/or soft tissue deficiency, mouth opening restriction, heavy smoking (\> 10 /per day) and parafunctional habits were included in the study.
  • All patients were initially evaluated for the suitability of an implant supported fixed prosthesis and any patients unsuitable for such prosthetic superstructure (i.e. severe hard and soft tissue athrophy, insufficient hygiene practice etc.) were excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, ıstnabul University

Istanbul, Capa, 34390, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol. 2010 Jan;81(1):43-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090348.

  • Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Sep;21(9):980-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01957.x. Epub 2010 May 24.

  • Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Mumcu E, Ozdemir T. Implant positioning errors in freehand and computer-aided placement methods: a single-blind clinical comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):190-204. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2691.

  • Arisan V, Bolukbasi N, Oksuz L. Computer-assisted flapless implant placement reduces the incidence of surgery-related bacteremia. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Dec;17(9):1985-93. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0886-y. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Dental Implants

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental MaterialsBiomedical and Dental MaterialsDental ProsthesisProsthodonticsDentistryProstheses and ImplantsEquipment and SuppliesManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Tayfun Ozdemir, Prof.Dr.

    Section head: Department of Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istabul University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Volkan Arısan, Dr.Med.Dent

    Department of Oral Implantology, Istanbul University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Cuneyt Z Karabuda, Prof.Dr.

    Department of Oral Implantology, Istanbul University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2009

First Posted

December 8, 2009

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion

January 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

November 27, 2013

Record last verified: 2007-06

Locations