NCT01026714

Brief Summary

The cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP) are the major drug-metabolizing enzyme system in humans. A great inter- individual variability affects the activity of these enzymes, and consequently the plasma drug concentrations resulting in different pharmacodynamic effects and occurrence of effect sides. Environmental factors, diet, drugs or genetics are responsible for this variability. Genetic factors are very important since the majority of these enzymes are highly polymorphic. For example, over 80 CYP2D6 allelic variants have been discovered so far and are associated to the absence, a decrease, or an increase in enzyme activity. Most polymorphisms were detected by adverse reactions occurring in a group within the population after normal doses of drugs had been administrated. Those patients experiencing adverse reactions often had a reduced capability to metabolize certain drugs. In clinical therapy, this variability has important consequences including the lack of response to a treatment and/or adverse drug reactions. In order to reduce these potentially unwanted events possibly leading to sever adverse reactions or death, it might therefore be of decisive interest to be able to assess the activity of these enzymes at the individual level. Two approaches may be used to assess CYPs activities, genotype and phenotype. Genotype is based on DNA analysis and polymorphism detection. Phenotype consists of administration of "model" drug or probe drug metabolized by a specific CYP and a determination of a ratio between the drug and its metabolite in plasma or urine. The principal drawback of the phenotyping methods is the urine collection overnight or at least 8 hours after the administration of probe test. This procedure is very tedious and time consuming for the patient as well as for the medical staff. The test can be performed in plasma or blood 1-2 hours after probe administration. However, this procedure is invasive and needs an important volume of blood (6 ml). Recently, a novel approach has been developed for the quantitative determination of circulating drug concentrations using dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper obtained with a simple finger prick. Due to the small blood volume required (about 10 µL) compared to conventional sampling, this minimally invasive method provides a patient-friendly alternative for blood collection in patient population where venous sampling is unethical or impossible (pediatrics). In addition, DBS sampling does not require the use of anticoagulant, plasma separation and decreases contact with infectious material. Furthermore, dried blood spots can be easily stored and shipped to analytical laboratories without using refrigerated devices. Thanks to the new developments in analytical techniques (mass spectrometry), which permit quantitative analysis from very small volume of blood. DBS sampling represents a powerful tool for the biomedical analyses, particularly in pharmacokinetic studies where several blood samples are needed and for phenotyping procedures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1 healthy-volunteers

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2009

Typical duration for phase_1 healthy-volunteers

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2009

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2009

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2009

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

January 11, 2011

Status Verified

December 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

December 1, 2009

Last Update Submit

January 10, 2011

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Flurbiprofen plasma and capillary rates in presence/absence of CYP2C9 inhibitor or inducer

    3 singles days spaced out with one week wash-out periods

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Correlation between CYP2C9 Genotype and Phenotype

    one day

Study Arms (3)

flurbiprofen 50mg po

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: flurbiprofen

flurbiprofen 50 mg po + CYP2C9 inducer

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: flurbiprofen, rifampicin

flurbiprofen 50 mg po + CYP2C9 inhibitor

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: flurbiprofen + fluconazole

Interventions

assessment of flurbiprofen plasmatic and capillary rates

flurbiprofen 50mg po

assessment of flurbiprofen plasmatic and capillary rates

flurbiprofen 50 mg po + CYP2C9 inducer

assessment of flurbiprofen plasmatic and capillary rates

flurbiprofen 50 mg po + CYP2C9 inhibitor

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergic to the administrated drugs
  • Contact lense
  • History of peptic ulcer or digestive bleeding
  • Long QT
  • Impaired hepatic tests (ASAT, ALAT, GGT, BILI)
  • Taking drugs interacting with CYP2C9 activity
  • Concomitant disease interacting with CYP2C9 activity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospitals

Geneva, 1211, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

FlurbiprofenRifampinFluconazole

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropionatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsBiphenyl CompoundsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsRifamycinsHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsLactams, MacrocyclicMacrocyclic CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsTriazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2009

First Posted

December 4, 2009

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion

August 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2010

Last Updated

January 11, 2011

Record last verified: 2009-12

Locations