CareLink® Network Evaluation
Medtronic CareLink® Network Evaluation Protocol
1 other identifier
observational
176
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the value of the Medtronic CareLink® Network in clinical practice in the country specific healthcare setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for all trials
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 23, 2015
CompletedJuly 2, 2025
November 1, 2016
3.2 years
November 26, 2009
August 22, 2014
June 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of Remote Device Check and In-clinic Device Assessment
"Investigators were asked the following question: how did the Medtronic CareLink system matched their personal expectation/goals and had to answer with multiple answer using the following ranking Significantly exceeded, Goals met, No expectations, Not met, Not met at all: Question 1) Newest technology for my patients. Q2) Increased patient safety. Q3) Increased patient satisfaction. Q4) Improved quality of life for my patients. Q5) Improved follow up after therapy/shock delivery of for symptomatic patients, adverse events. Q6) Increased hospital efficiency. Q7) Increased follow up quality. Q8) More flexible follow up schemes possible. Q9) Better management of the increased number of follow ups. Q10) Increased satisfaction of hospital personnel. Q11) Other goals"
Baseline to max. 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Patient Ease of Use of, and Satisfaction With the Medtronic CareLink® Monitor (Including Percentage of Patients Who Prefer Follow up With Medtronic CareLink® Compared to Traditional In-clinic Device Follow-up)
Baseline to max. 12 months
Clinician Ease of Use of, and Satisfaction With, the Medtronic CareLink® Monitor and Website (Including Clinician General Preference, if Any, for Medtronic CareLink® Compared to Traditional In-clinic Device Follow-up)
Baseline to max. 12 months
Clinic-specific Clinical Value of Medtronic CareLink® Network (Change of Workflow, Increase of Flexibility)
Baseline to max. 12 months
Time and Cost Savings for Patients
Baseline to max. 12 months
Time and Costs Savings for Physicians
Baseline to max. 12 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Medtronic CareLink® Network
Patients with implanted Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) devices, who will be monitored by the Medtronic CareLink® System. The System consists of the Medtronic CareLink® Monitor and Medtronic CareLink® Clinician Website.
Interventions
The Medtronic CareLink® Network consists of the Medtronic CareLink® Monitor and Medtronic CareLink® Clinician Website
Eligibility Criteria
Patients under the care at a participating study location who have an implanted Medtronic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) device that is supported by the Medtronic CareLink® Network.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have an implanted Medtronic ICD, CRT-D device that is supported by the Medtronic CareLink® Network
- Patients have to sign the Medtronic CareLink® "Statement of Privacy Principles" and the "Evaluation Data Protection Statement" documents
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is anticipated to demonstrate poor compliance (for example, mental disturbances)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
I Cardiology Clinic, Clinical University Center
Gdansk, Poland
John Paul II Hospital, Clinic of Electrocardiology
Krakow, Poland
The University Hospital in Krakow; I Department of Cardiology
Krakow, Poland
I Department of Cardiology, Medical University in Poznan
Poznan, Poland
Cardiology Clinic, Pomeranian Medical University SPSK-2
Szczecin, Poland
Public Independent Central Clinical Hospital - SP-CSK
Warsaw, Poland
The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski Institute of Cardiology, 2nd Department of Coronary Artery Disease
Warsaw, Poland
The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski Institute of Cardiology, Cardiac Arrhythmias Department
Warsaw, Poland
4th Military Clinical Hospital, Clinic of Cardiology
Wroclaw, Poland
Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Clinic of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology and Inborn Defects of Heart and Electrotherapy
Zabrze, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof. Hanna Szwed
- Organization
- Institute of Cardiology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hanna Szwed, Prof.
Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland, Spartanska 1
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2009
First Posted
December 1, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 2, 2025
Results First Posted
April 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2016-11