NCT01023022

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the value of the Medtronic CareLink® Network in clinical practice in the country specific healthcare setting.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
176

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 26, 2009

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 1, 2009

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2013

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 23, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 2, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

November 26, 2009

Results QC Date

August 22, 2014

Last Update Submit

June 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

CareLinkRemote MonitoringCardiac Pacemaker, ArtificialImplantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of Remote Device Check and In-clinic Device Assessment

    "Investigators were asked the following question: how did the Medtronic CareLink system matched their personal expectation/goals and had to answer with multiple answer using the following ranking Significantly exceeded, Goals met, No expectations, Not met, Not met at all: Question 1) Newest technology for my patients. Q2) Increased patient safety. Q3) Increased patient satisfaction. Q4) Improved quality of life for my patients. Q5) Improved follow up after therapy/shock delivery of for symptomatic patients, adverse events. Q6) Increased hospital efficiency. Q7) Increased follow up quality. Q8) More flexible follow up schemes possible. Q9) Better management of the increased number of follow ups. Q10) Increased satisfaction of hospital personnel. Q11) Other goals"

    Baseline to max. 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Patient Ease of Use of, and Satisfaction With the Medtronic CareLink® Monitor (Including Percentage of Patients Who Prefer Follow up With Medtronic CareLink® Compared to Traditional In-clinic Device Follow-up)

    Baseline to max. 12 months

  • Clinician Ease of Use of, and Satisfaction With, the Medtronic CareLink® Monitor and Website (Including Clinician General Preference, if Any, for Medtronic CareLink® Compared to Traditional In-clinic Device Follow-up)

    Baseline to max. 12 months

  • Clinic-specific Clinical Value of Medtronic CareLink® Network (Change of Workflow, Increase of Flexibility)

    Baseline to max. 12 months

  • Time and Cost Savings for Patients

    Baseline to max. 12 months

  • Time and Costs Savings for Physicians

    Baseline to max. 12 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Medtronic CareLink® Network

Patients with implanted Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) devices, who will be monitored by the Medtronic CareLink® System. The System consists of the Medtronic CareLink® Monitor and Medtronic CareLink® Clinician Website.

Other: Medtronic CareLink® Network

Interventions

The Medtronic CareLink® Network consists of the Medtronic CareLink® Monitor and Medtronic CareLink® Clinician Website

Medtronic CareLink® Network

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients under the care at a participating study location who have an implanted Medtronic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) device that is supported by the Medtronic CareLink® Network.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who have an implanted Medtronic ICD, CRT-D device that is supported by the Medtronic CareLink® Network
  • Patients have to sign the Medtronic CareLink® "Statement of Privacy Principles" and the "Evaluation Data Protection Statement" documents

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient is anticipated to demonstrate poor compliance (for example, mental disturbances)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

I Cardiology Clinic, Clinical University Center

Gdansk, Poland

Location

John Paul II Hospital, Clinic of Electrocardiology

Krakow, Poland

Location

The University Hospital in Krakow; I Department of Cardiology

Krakow, Poland

Location

I Department of Cardiology, Medical University in Poznan

Poznan, Poland

Location

Cardiology Clinic, Pomeranian Medical University SPSK-2

Szczecin, Poland

Location

Public Independent Central Clinical Hospital - SP-CSK

Warsaw, Poland

Location

The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski Institute of Cardiology, 2nd Department of Coronary Artery Disease

Warsaw, Poland

Location

The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski Institute of Cardiology, Cardiac Arrhythmias Department

Warsaw, Poland

Location

4th Military Clinical Hospital, Clinic of Cardiology

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Clinic of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology and Inborn Defects of Heart and Electrotherapy

Zabrze, Poland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof. Hanna Szwed
Organization
Institute of Cardiology

Study Officials

  • Hanna Szwed, Prof.

    Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland, Spartanska 1

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2009

First Posted

December 1, 2009

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

March 1, 2013

Study Completion

October 1, 2013

Last Updated

July 2, 2025

Results First Posted

April 23, 2015

Record last verified: 2016-11

Locations