A Trial of Trans-radial Versus Trans-femoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Access Site Approach in Patients With Unstable Angina or Myocardial Infarction Managed With an Invasive Strategy
RIVAL
An International Randomized Trial of Trans-radial Versus Trans-femoral PCI Access Site Approach in Patients With Unstable Angina or Myocardial Infarction Managed With an Invasive Strategy. An Extension to the CURRENT (OASIS 7) Substudy (EFC5695): Effect of Type of Access for PCI (Radial or Femoral) on Bleeding Rate-Substudy.
1 other identifier
interventional
7,021
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a multi-national, multi-centre, randomized study comparing the trans-radial PCI access strategy and the trans-femoral PCI access strategy in ACS patients with UA or NSTEMI or STEMI planned to be treated with an invasive strategy (PCI). The hypothesis is that radial access site PCI will be associated with significantly less major bleeding and access site complications compared with a femoral approach, without increasing the risk of ischemic events. The overall benefit-risk profile will favor a trans-radial approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jun 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedApril 7, 2011
February 1, 2011
4.7 years
November 13, 2009
April 6, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First occurrence of the composite of death, MI, stroke or non CABG major bleeding (i.e. severe bleeding, other major bleeding) at 30 days.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Non CABG major bleeding
within 30 days following randomization
Death, MI or stroke
within 30 days following randomization
Study Arms (2)
Trans-femoral access
ACTIVE COMPARATORFemoral artery PCI access site
Trans-radial access
ACTIVE COMPARATORRadial artery PCI access site
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- UA/NSTEMI patients
- Ischemic symptoms suspected to represent a non-ST segment elevation ACS (unstable angina \[UA\] or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction NSTEMI) defined as:
- Clinical history consistent with new onset, or a worsening pattern, of characteristic ischemic chest pain occurring at rest or with minimal exercise (lasting longer than 10 minutes) and planned to be managed with an invasive strategy
- AND at least one of the following:
- Electrocardiogram (ECG) changes compatible with new ischemia \[ST depression of at least 1mm or transient ST elevation or ST elevation of less than or equal to 1 mm or T wave inversion greater than 2 mm in at least 2 contiguous leads\].
- Patients \> 60 years of age with normal ECG are eligible provided there is a high degree of certainty that presenting symptoms are due to myocardial ischemia. Such patients must have documented evidence of previous coronary artery disease (CAD) with at least one of the following:
- Prior MI requiring hospitalization
- Prior revascularization procedure (more than 3 months ago)
- Cardiac catheterization showing significant CAD
- Positive exercise test
- Other objective evidence of atherosclerotic vascular disease or
- Already elevated cardiac enzymes or troponin I or T above the upper limit of normal.
- STEMI patients
- Presenting with signs or symptoms of acute myocardial infarction lasting at least 20 minutes and planned to be managed with an invasive strategy with intent to perform a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization.
- Definite ECG changes compatible with STEMI: persistent ST-elevation (\> 2 mm in two contiguous precordial leads or \> 1 mm in at least two limb leads), or new left bundle branch block, or Q-wave in 2 contiguous leads
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- Active bleeding or significant increased risk of bleeding, severe hepatic insufficiency, current peptic ulceration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Cardiogenic shock
- Prior CABG surgery with use of more than one internal mammary artery
- Documented severe peripheral vascular disease precluding a femoral approach
- Participation in any study with an investigational drug or device within the previous 30 days
- Medical, geographic or social factors making study participation impractical
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Population Health Research Institutelead
- Sanoficollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2, Canada
Related Publications (6)
Cantor WJ, Mehta SR, Yuan F, Dzavik V, Worthley M, Niemela K, Valentin V, Fung A, Cheema AN, Widimsky P, Natarajan M, Jedrzejowski B, Jolly SS. Radial versus femoral access for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography and intervention: insights from the RIVAL trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):880-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Aug 16.
PMID: 26542495DERIVEDJolly SS, Cairns J, Yusuf S, Niemela K, Steg PG, Worthley M, Ferrari E, Cantor WJ, Fung A, Valettas N, Rokoss M, Olivecrona GK, Widimsky P, Cheema AN, Gao P, Mehta SR; RIVAL Investigators. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 18;63(10):954-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.052. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
PMID: 24269362DERIVEDJolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Steg PG, Natarajan MK, Cheema AN, Rao SV, Cantor WJ, Dzavik V, Budaj A, Sheth T, Valentin V, Fung A, Widimsky P, Ferrari E, Gao P, Jedrzejowski B, Mehta SR; RIVAL Investigators. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016.
PMID: 23517837DERIVEDMehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Rao SV, Cheema AN, Steg PG, Cantor WJ, Dzavik V, Budaj A, Rokoss M, Valentin V, Gao P, Yusuf S; RIVAL Investigators. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
PMID: 23103036DERIVEDJolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1409-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
PMID: 21470671DERIVEDJolly SS, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Cairns J, Chrolavicius S, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):254-260.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.021.
PMID: 21315206DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sanjit Jolly, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Population Health Research Institute
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Susan Chrolavicius
Population Health Research Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shamir Mehta, MD, MSc, FRCP(C), FACC
Population Health Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2009
First Posted
November 16, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Primary Completion
February 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 7, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-02