The Effect of a New Emulsion in Dry Eye Patients on Tear Layer Aberrometry, Contrast Sensitivity, and Reading Ability
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate how the addition of a new emulsion artificial tear to the tear layer of dry eye and normal patients affects aberrometry, contrast sensitivity, and reading ability over time. Previous studies have indicated that daily use of artificial tears over a two week period decreases the short term affect of drop application on aberrometry and contrast sensitivity measurements. The present study will examine the effects of 4 weeks of artificial tear use to determine when the responses stabilize.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 13, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 12, 2025
CompletedJune 12, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.3 years
November 11, 2009
December 17, 2012
June 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Contrast Sensitivity
Change in contrast sensitivity with administration of the artificial tear. During a visit, contrast sensitivity is initially monitored for several minutes (i.e., pre-artificial tear application contrast sensitivity) and the artificial tear is then applied and the contrast sensitivity is continually measured for several more minutes (post-artificial tear application contrast sensitivity). The administration of the artificial tear decreases contrast sensitivity for approximately a minute. The data reported in the table is the change in contrast sensitivity from pre-artificial tear administration to the peak loss in contrast sensitivity after the artificial tear administration (negative values). This procedure is carried out before the subjects use artificial tears on a daily basis (i.e., baseline data) and for several weeks after using artificial tears on a daily basis (i.e., weeks 1, 2, and 4) to determine if there is an adaptation to the artificial tear.
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Optive, Soothe, New Emulsion
EXPERIMENTALSubjects do not use artificial tears for one week followed by 1 month using Optive two times per day. One week washout then 1 month Soothe two times per day followed by one week washout and one month New Emulsion 2 times per day.
Soothe, New Emulsion, Optive
EXPERIMENTALSubjects do not use artificial tears for one week followed by 1 month using Soothe two times per day. One week washout then 1 month New Emulsion two times per day followed by one week washout and one month Optive 2 times per day.
New Emulsion, Optive, Soothe
EXPERIMENTALSubjects do not use artificial tears for one week followed by 1 month using New Emulsion two times per day. One week washout then 1 month Optive two times per day followed by one week washout and one month Soothe 2 times per day.
Interventions
One week without artificial tear use followed by Optive use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by Soothe use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by the New Emulsion use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month.
One week without artificial tear use followed by Soothe use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by New Emulsion use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by the Optive use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month.
One week without artificial tear use followed by New Emulsion use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by Optive use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month. One week without artificial tear use followed by the Soothe use a minimum of 2 drops per day for 1 month.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- mild, moderate, or severe symptoms of dry eye
You may not qualify if:
- uncontrolled systemic disease
- contact lens wear
- participation in another clinical trial
- best corrected visual acuity poorer than 20/25
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Southern California College of Optometry
Fullerton, California, 92831, United States
Related Publications (3)
Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Ridder WH. Contact lens drying and visual performance: the vision cycle with contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Jun;79(6):381-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200206000-00012.
PMID: 12086305BACKGROUNDRidder WH 3rd, Lamotte JO, Ngo L, Fermin J. Short-term effects of artificial tears on visual performance in normal subjects. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 May;82(5):370-377. doi: 10.1097/01.OPX.0000162646.30666.E3.
PMID: 15894913BACKGROUNDRidder WH 3rd, LaMotte J, Hall JQ Jr, Sinn R, Nguyen AL, Abufarie L. Contrast sensitivity and tear layer aberrometry in dry eye patients. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Sep;86(9):E1059-68. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181b599bf.
PMID: 19648840BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- William Ridder
- Organization
- Southern California College of Optometry
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William H. Ridder, OD, PhD
Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2009
First Posted
November 13, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 12, 2025
Results First Posted
June 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All data is available upon request.