NCT01011816

Brief Summary

The purpose of this investigation is to establish the safety and efficacy of the Biostat System when used for treatment of chronic low back (lumbar) pain due to symptomatic internal disc disruptions (IDD) by comparing safety and efficacy outcome measures between one group receiving BIOSTAT BIOLOGX® Fibrin Sealant through the Biostat® Delivery Device and another group receiving a preservative-free normal saline control delivered with the Biostat Delivery Device.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
220

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2010

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

20 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 9, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 11, 2009

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2010

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 5, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

May 16, 2014

Status Verified

May 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

November 9, 2009

Results QC Date

April 2, 2014

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

intervertebral disk

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Subject Composite Success

    Subject success based on a composite of minimum 30% decrease in low back pain, 30% improvement in function, maintenance of neurological status, no secondary interventions, and no serious adverse events.

    26 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Visual Analog Scale for Low Back Pain

    26-weeks

  • Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Score

    26-weeks

Study Arms (2)

BIOSTAT BIOLOGX

EXPERIMENTAL

One injection of up to 4 mL of BIOSTAT BIOLOGX Fibrin Sealant into a single lumbar intervertebral disc

Biological: BIOSTAT BIOLOGX

Saline

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

One injection of up to 4 mL of saline solution into a single lumbar intervertebral disc

Drug: Saline

Interventions

BIOSTAT BIOLOGXBIOLOGICAL

One injection of up to 4 mL of BIOSTAT BIOLOGX Fibrin Sealant into a single lumbar intervertebral disc using the Biostat Delivery Device

Also known as: Fibrin Sealant
BIOSTAT BIOLOGX
SalineDRUG

One injection of up to 4 mL of saline using the Biostat Delivery Device

Also known as: 0.9% w/v Sodium Chloride Injection, USP
Saline

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or older and skeletally mature.
  • Voluntarily signs the subject informed consent form and agrees to the release of medical information for purposes of this study (HIPAA authorization).
  • Physically and mentally able to comply with the protocol, including ability to read and complete required forms, and willing and able to adhere to the follow-up requirements of the protocol.
  • Chronic low back pain for at least 6 months.
  • Pretreatment baseline low back pain of at least 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale.
  • Pretreatment baseline Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score of at least 9 on the 24-point questionnaire.
  • Leg pain, if present, is of nonradicular origin, i.e., not due to stimulation of nerve roots or dorsal root ganglion of a spinal nerve by compressive forces.
  • Leg pain, if present, does not extend below the knee and is no greater than 50% of low back pain as measured on a visual analog scale. If bilateral leg pain, the worst leg pain is no greater than 50% of low back pain.
  • Low back pain unresponsive to at least 3 months of nonoperative care, which may include bed rest, antiinflammatory and analgesic medications, chiropractic manipulations, acupuncture, massage, physical therapy or home-directed lumbar exercise program.
  • Diagnostic medial branch block or facet joint injection between 18 months and 2 weeks prior to the study procedure indicates no facet joint involvement.
  • Diagnosis of symptomatic lumbar (L1-L2 - L5-S1) internal disc disruption (IDD), which requires confirmation of discogenic pain at one or two contiguous levels through positive provocation discography performed between 18 months and 2 weeks prior to the study procedure using pressure manometry and identification of an adjacent nonpainful disc. The disc provocation studies must precisely demonstrate concordant pain (\<50 psi above opening pressure) and must demonstrate a fissure(s) in the outer one-third of the posterior or lateral anulus.

You may not qualify if:

  • Cauda equina syndrome.
  • Active malignancy or tumor as source of symptoms.
  • Current infection or prior history of spinal infection (e.g., discitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess) or an active systemic infection.
  • Previous lumbar spine surgery.
  • Evidence of prior lumbar vertebral body fracture.
  • Disc bulge/protrusion or focal herniation at the symptomatic level(s) \> 4 mm.
  • Presence of disc extrusion or sequestration.
  • Leg pain is greater than 50% of low back pain as measured on a visual analog scale.
  • Leg pain that extends below the knee.
  • Lumbar intervertebral foramen stenosis at the affected level(s) resulting in significant spinal nerve root compression (effacement of the majority of periganglion fat and loss of CSF signal around the nerve rootlets).
  • Symptomatic central vertebral canal stenosis or absolute sagittal vertebral canal diameter \< 9mm.
  • Loss of disc space height at the symptomatic level(s) greater than one-third of an adjacent normal disc (or of the expected height in the case of an L5-S1 disc).
  • Spondylolisthesis (\> Grade 1) with or without spondylolysis at the symptomatic level(s).
  • Lumbar spondylitis or other undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy.
  • Dynamic instability at the symptomatic level(s) on lumbar flexion-extension radiographs indicated by \>4.5 mm of translation or angular motion \>15° at L1-L2, L2-L3, or L3-L4; \>20° at L4-L5; or \>25° at L5-S1.
  • +21 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (20)

Alabama Clinical Therapeutics, LLC

Birmingham, Alabama, 35235, United States

Location

HOPE Research Institute

Phoenix, Arizona, 85050, United States

Location

Pain Control Associates of San Diego

Chula Vista, California, 91914, United States

Location

Napa Pain Institute

Napa, California, 94559, United States

Location

California Spine Diagnostics

San Francisco, California, 94115, United States

Location

The Spine Institute

Santa Monica, California, 90403, United States

Location

The Pain Institute, Inc

Merritt Island, Florida, 32953, United States

Location

Millennium Pain Center

Bloomington, Illinois, 61701, United States

Location

The Spine Center

Baltimore, Maryland, 21211, United States

Location

Medical Advanced Pain Specialists Applied Research Center

Edina, Minnesota, 55435, United States

Location

NewSouth NeuroSpine Pain Center

Flowood, Mississippi, 39232, United States

Location

OrthoCarolina Spine Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States

Location

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

OrthoNeuro, Inc.

New Albany, Ohio, 43054, United States

Location

Allegheny Pain Management

Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16602, United States

Location

Orthopaedic & Spine Specialists

York, Pennsylvania, 17402, United States

Location

Spine Specialists PA

Tyler, Texas, 75701, United States

Location

Virginia Spine Research Institute

Richmond, Virginia, 23235, United States

Location

Advanced Pain Management

Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23454, United States

Location

Bellingham Spine Pain Specialists PS

Bellingham, Washington, 98226, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Yin W, Pauza K, Olan WJ, Doerzbacher JF, Thorne KJ. Intradiscal injection of fibrin sealant for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar internal disc disruption: results of a prospective multicenter pilot study with 24-month follow-up. Pain Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):16-31. doi: 10.1111/pme.12249. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

    PMID: 24152079BACKGROUND
  • Buser Z, Keulling F, Jane L, Liebenberg E, Tang J, Thorne K, Coughlin D, Lotz J. Fibrin injection stimulates early disc healing in the porcine model [NASS Abstract 199]. Spine Journal 9:105S, 2009.

    BACKGROUND
  • Buser Z, Kuelling F, Liu J, Liebenberg E, Thorne KJ, Coughlin D, Lotz JC. Biological and biomechanical effects of fibrin injection into porcine intervertebral discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 15;36(18):E1201-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820566b2.

    PMID: 21325992BACKGROUND
  • Pauza K, Yin W, Olan W, Doerzbacher JF. BIOSTAT BIOLOGX(R) intradiscal fibrin sealant used for treatment of chronic low back pain caused by lumbar disc disruption: results of a 12 month, prospective multicenter pilot study. Spine Arthroplasty Society Meeting, April 27-30, 2010; New Orleans, LA. Abstract 248.

    BACKGROUND
  • Yin W, Pauza K, Olan W, Doerzbacher JF. Long-term outcomes from a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption (IDE) pilot study of intradiscal fibrin sealant for the treatment of discogenic pain [ISIS Abstract]. Pain Medicine 12:1446-1447, 2011

    BACKGROUND
  • Buser Z, Liu J, Thorne KJ, Coughlin D, Lotz JC. Inflammatory response of intervertebral disc cells is reduced by fibrin sealant scaffold in vitro. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2014 Jan;8(1):77-84. doi: 10.1002/term.1503. Epub 2012 May 18.

    PMID: 22610998BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Back PainIntervertebral Disc Degeneration

Interventions

Fibrin Tissue AdhesiveSodium Chloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FibrinBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jeff Doerzbacher
Organization
formerly Spinal Restoration, Inc

Study Officials

  • Kevin J Pauza, MD

    Spine Specialists PA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2009

First Posted

November 11, 2009

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

May 16, 2014

Results First Posted

May 5, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-05

Locations