Nipple Sparing Mastectomy - Cosmetic Outcomes
Preservation of the Nipple Areolar Complex With Skin Sparing Mastectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to observe the cosmetic outcomes, patient satisfaction, and complications after skin sparing mastectomy with preservation of the nipple areolar complex.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Jan 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 24, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2018
CompletedApril 21, 2022
January 1, 2019
7.6 years
October 26, 2009
April 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Cosmetic Appearance
First Post Operative year
Patient Satisfaction
First Post Operative Year
Presence of tumor in nipple areolar complex frozen section
Duration of Study
Presence of tumor in nipple areolar complex permanent histology
Duration of study
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Complications
First Post Operative year
Local Recurrence
One year
Study Arms (1)
Nipple Sparing Mastectomy
EXPERIMENTALPatients who undergo nipple sparing mastectomy with preservation of the nipple areolar complex.
Interventions
Skin sparing mastectomy with preservation of the nipple areolar complex
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients requiring mastectomy for cancer and/or prophylaxis
- Age greater than or equal to 18 at time of surgery
- BMI less than or equal to 35
- If mastectomy is indicated for removal of breast cancer, tumor is clinically T1 or T2
You may not qualify if:
- Currently smoking
- Prior radiation to the affected breast
- Systemic lupus erythematosus
- Central tumor location and/or tumor within 2 cm of NAC
- Paget's disease of the nipple
- Clinical evidence of tumor involvement in the nipple
- Clinical evidence of axillary nodal tumor involvement
- Lymphovascular invasion of the tumor on core biopsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
Related Publications (13)
Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Lambasa S, Petrovecki M, Stanec Z. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):240-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000171680.49971.85.
PMID: 16106159BACKGROUNDCrowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008 Nov;143(11):1106-10; discussion 1110. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.11.1106.
PMID: 19015470BACKGROUNDCrowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, Banbury J, Patrick RJ, Baynes D. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004 Feb;139(2):148-50. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.148.
PMID: 14769571BACKGROUNDSacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, Boratto MG, Ricci MD, Ruiz CA, Nisida AC, Veronesi P, Petit J, Arnone P, Bassi F, Disa JJ, Garcia-Etienne CA, Borgen PI. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
PMID: 17084333BACKGROUNDStolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 May;15(5):1341-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9753-5. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
PMID: 18256883BACKGROUNDWijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, Esserman LJ. Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):38-45; discussion 45. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.1.38.
PMID: 18209151BACKGROUNDBanerjee A, Gupta S, Bhattacharya N. Preservation of nipple-areola complex in breast cancer--a clinicopathological assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Oct;61(10):1195-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
PMID: 17901007BACKGROUNDLoewen MJ, Jennings JA, Sherman SR, Slaikeu J, Ebrom PA, Davis AT, Fitzgerald TL. Mammographic distance as a predictor of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008 Mar;195(3):391-4; discussion 394-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.020.
PMID: 18207131BACKGROUNDLaronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999 Sep;6(6):609-13. doi: 10.1007/s10434-999-0609-z.
PMID: 10493632BACKGROUNDGerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Muller H, Kuchenmeister I, Makovitzky J, Kundt G, Friese K. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003 Jul;238(1):120-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000077922.38307.cd.
PMID: 12832974BACKGROUNDFitzal F. Can nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with modified extended latissimus dorsi muscular flap improve the cosmetic and functional outcome of patients with breast cancer? World J Surg. 2008 Mar;32(3):499; author reply 500-1. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9268-z. No abstract available.
PMID: 17952495BACKGROUNDCarlson GW, Losken A, Moore B, Thornton J, Elliott M, Bolitho G, Denson DD. Results of immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2001 Mar;46(3):222-8. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200103000-00003.
PMID: 11293510BACKGROUNDLowery JC, Wilkins EG, Kuzon WM, Davis JA. Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg. 1996 Jun;36(6):601-6; discussion 607. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199606000-00007.
PMID: 8792969BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard L White, MD
Carolinas Healthcare
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2009
First Posted
October 27, 2009
Study Start
January 21, 2009
Primary Completion
August 24, 2016
Study Completion
September 20, 2018
Last Updated
April 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2019-01