NCT01001832

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of abatacept after subcutaneous and intravenous administration in Japanese participants with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
118

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 rheumatoid-arthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2009

Longer than P75 for phase_2 rheumatoid-arthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

33 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 26, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 27, 2009

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2009

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2011

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2012

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 7, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2014

Status Verified

January 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

October 26, 2009

Results QC Date

October 22, 2012

Last Update Submit

January 2, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Day 169 in Short Term Period

    The ACR score of 20 indicates the degree of improvement in a patient's rheumatoid arthritis (RA), based on ACR guidelines (ACR20). The ACR score represents a percentage. To qualify for an ACR20 score, the patient must have \>=20% fewer tender joints and \>=20% fewer swollen joints and show 20% improvement in at least 3 of: patient overall assessment of his/her RA, physician global assessment of the patient's RA, patient self-assessment of pain, patient self-assessment of physical functioning, and results of an erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein test (to assess inflammation). Percentage is calculated n/N with n=number of participants with ACR score of 20 and N= all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

    Day 169

  • Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Day 533 in Long Term Period - All Randomized and Treated Participants During the Long Term Period

    The ACR score indicates the degree of improvement in a patient's rheumatoid arthritis (RA), based on ACR guidelines. The ACR score= a percentage. To qualify for a score of 20, 50 or 70 (ACR20, ACR50 or ACR70), the patient must have \>=20%, \>=50% or \>=70%, respectively, fewer tender joints and \>=20%, \>=50% or \>=70%, respectively, fewer swollen joints and show 20%, 50% or 70%, respectively, improvement in at least 3 of the following: patient overall assessment of his/her RA, physician global assessment of the patient's RA, patient self-assessment of pain, patient self-assessment of physical functioning, and results of an erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein test (to assess inflammation). Treatment groups represent treatment received in the short term period. Percentage calculated as n/m with n=number of paticipants with sustained ACR response at Day 533; m= long term participants who received at least one dose of drug and were ACR responders in the short term period.

    Day 533

  • Mean Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Day 533 in Long Term Period

    Adjusted mean. The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) assesses patients' functional ability by rating their abilities over the previous week. At least 2 questions are asked from each of 8 categories: dressing and grooming, hygiene, arising, reach, eating, grip, walking, and common daily activities. Patients rate difficulty performing specific tasks: 0=without difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The sum of the categories score (the highest scored item in the category) is divided by the number of categories answered, yielding a score from 0-3. Treatment groups represent treatment received in the short term period. Baseline is Day 1 of the study or last non-missing pre-treatment value.

    Baseline to Day 533

  • Percentage of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response at Day 533 in Long Term Period

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index assesses patients' functional ability by rating their abilities over the previous week. At least 2 questions are asked from each of 8 categories: dressing and grooming, hygiene, arising, reach, eating, grip, walking, and common daily activities. Patients rate difficulty performing specific tasks: 0=without difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The higher the number the worse the outcome. The sum of the categories score (the highest scored item in the category) is divided by the number of categories answered, yielding a score from 0-3. HAQ response=reduction of at least 0.30 units in HAQ score from baseline. The percentage of participants with a reduction of at least 0.30 units in their HAQ score from baseline is presented. Baseline is Day 1 of the study or last non-missing pre-treatment value. Treatment groups represent treatment received in the short term period.

    Day 533

  • Mean Change in DAS28-CRP From Baseline at Day 533 in Long Term Period

    The Disease Activity Score 28 using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) is a measure of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and assesses the 28 joints RA commonly affects; the score includes the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28), CRP level (a measure of inflammation in the blood), and the patient's global assessment of health (ranging from very good to very bad). An overall DAS \>5.1 implies active disease; \<3.2, well controlled disease; and \<2.6, remission.). Treatment groups represent treatment received in the short term period. Baseline is Day 1 of the study or last non-missing pre-treatment value.

    Baseline to Day 533

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) and American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Responses at Day 169 in Short Term Period

    Day 169

  • Mean Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Day 169 in Short Term Period

    Baseline to Day 169

  • Percentage of Participants With HAQ Response at Day 169 in the Short Term Period

    Day 169

  • Mean Change From Baseline at Six Months in DAS28-CRP - All Treated Participants

    Baseline to 6 Months

  • Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-Defined Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS) and EULAR-defined Remission (REM) at Day 169 in Short Term Period

    Day 169

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Subcutaneous (SC) abatacept, 125 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Subcutaneous (SC) abatacept

Intravenous (IV) abatacept, 125 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Intravenous (IV) abatacept

Interventions

IV vial, 125-mg infusions on Days 1, 15, and 29, and every 28 days thereafter until Day 141.

Also known as: BMS-188667
Intravenous (IV) abatacept, 125 mg

Solution in prefilled syringes, SC, 125 mg, once weekly, for 169 days and then for 52 weeks

Also known as: BMS-188667
Subcutaneous (SC) abatacept, 125 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Meeting criteria of the American Rheumatism Association for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the American College of Rheumatology functional Classes I, II, or III.
  • Inadequate response (as deemed by investigator) to methotrexate taken for at least 3 months (12 weeks) at a stable dose (6 to 8 mg/week) for 28 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
  • Stabilization requirements for concomitant therapy: Oral corticosteroid treatment reduced to the equivalent of ≤10 mg prednisolone daily for 28 days and stabilized for at least 25 of 28 days prior to treatment (Day 1). No intra-articular, intravenous, or intramuscular injections of corticosteroids were permitted within 28 days prior to randomization (Day 1.)
  • Washout requirements: Participants receiving combination RA therapy had to discontinue the following therapies at least 28 days prior to treatment (Day 1):
  • disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as gold (auranofin and aurothiomalate sodium), actarit, bucillamine, azathioprine, salazosulfapyridine, lobenzarit disodium, D-penicillamine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, mizoribine; cyclosporin, tacrolimus, and other calcineurin inhibitors; and immunoadsorption columns.
  • Disease Activity Requirements: At randomization (Day 1), participants had to meet the following disease activity criteria: Swollen joint count: 10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count); tender joint count: 12 or more tender joints (68 joint count); C reactive protein (CRP): ≥0.8 mg/dL (result from screening visit).
  • For participants receiving methotrexate plus other DMARDs(washout of a combination therapy required): At screening visit, participants had to meet the following disease activity criteria: Swollen joint count: 6 or more swollen joints (66 joint count); tender joint count: 8 or more tender joints (68 joint count); CRP: no restriction on CRP (not applicable).
  • After washout, at randomization (Day 1), participants must meet the following disease activity criteria: Swollen joint count-10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count) and tender joint count-12 or more tender joints (68 joint count) and CRP: ≥0.8 mg/dL (result from screening visit). For those whose screening period were longer than 4 weeks, CRP test needed to be performed on Day
  • to Day -3 (prior to treatment Day 1) to verify eligibility.

You may not qualify if:

  • Current symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic, or cerebral disease. Concomitant medical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, might place the participant at unacceptable risk for participation in this study.
  • Female participants who had undergone breast cancer screening that was suspicious for malignancy, and in whom the possibility of malignancy could not be reasonably excluded following additional clinical, laboratory, or other diagnostic evaluations.
  • History of cancer within the last 5 years (other than nonmelanoma skin cell cancers cured by local resection)
  • Existing nonmelanoma skin cell cancers had been removed prior to the first administration. Participants with carcinoma in situ, treated with definitive surgical intervention prior to study entry were allowed to participate.
  • Clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse
  • Any serious acute bacterial infection (such as pneumonia or pyelonephritis unless treated and completely resolved with antibiotics)
  • Serious, chronic, or recurrent bacterial infections (such as recurrent pneumonia, chronic bronchiectasis)
  • Those at risk for tuberculosis (TB). Specifically, those with current clinical, radiographic, or laboratory evidence suggestive of active TB; history of active TB within the last 3 years, even if treated; history of active TB more than 3 years ago unless there was documentation that the prior anti-TB treatment was appropriate in type and duration; latent TB that was not successfully treated. Participants with a positive result on TB screening test indicative of latent TB were not eligible for the study unless active TB infection had been ruled out and treatment for latent TB with isoniazid had been initiated for at least 4 weeks prior to administration of the study drug and the participant had a negative finding for TB on a chest X-ray film at enrollment.
  • Herpes zoster resolving less than 2 months prior to enrollment
  • Current evidence (as assessed by the investigator) suggestive of active or latent bacterial or viral infections, including human immunodeficiency virus infection.
  • Physical examination and laboratory test findings: Hepatitis B surface antigen-positive status; hepatitis C antibody-positive status. Any of the following laboratory values: Hemoglobin concentration: \<.5 g/dL; white blood cell count: \<3,000/μL (3\*10\^9/L); platelet count: \<100,000/mm\^3(100\*10\^9/L); serum creatinine: \>2 times upper limit of normal (ULN); serum alanine aminotransferase: \>2 ULN; serum aspartate aminotransferase: \>2 ULN.
  • Prohibited treatments and/or therapies: Prior exposure to abatacept (CTLA4-Ig); prior RA treatment with any biologics, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy; prior exposure to any investigational biologic not currently approved in Japan; exposure to any study medication in any other previous study within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever was longer; receipt of any live vaccines within 3 months of administration of study medication or scheduled to receive live vaccines.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (33)

Local Institution

Narita-Shi, Chiba, 2868523, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 8108563, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Kitakyushu-Shi, Fukuoka, 8078555, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Kurume-Shi, Fukuoka, 8308543, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Maebashi, Gunma, 3718511, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Takasaki-Shi, Gunma, 3700053, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Higashi-Hiroshima-Shi, Hiroshima, 7390002, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608604, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608648, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0630005, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0630811, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Kanzaki-Gun, Hyōgo, 6792414, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Kato-Shi, Hyōgo, 6731462, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Kobe, Hyōgo, 6500001, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Hitachi-Shi, Ibaraki, 3160035, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, 8900067, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Sagamihara-Shi, Kanagawa, 2520392, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Yokohama, Kanagawa, 2220036, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Yokohama, Kanagawa, 2360037, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Nagano, Nagano, 3808582, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Kurashiki-Shi, Okayama-ken, 7128044, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Hannan-Shi, Osaka, 5990212, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Iruma-Gun, Saitama, 3500495, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Kawagoe-Shi, Saitama, 3508550, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Kitamoto-Shi, Saitama, 3640026, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Tokorozawa-Shi, Saitama, 3591111, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 4308558, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Shizuoka, Shizuoka, 4208623, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 3290498, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Utsunomiya, Tochigi, 3291193, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 1138519, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Nakano-Ku, Tokyo, 1648541, Japan

Location

Local Institution

Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 1608582, Japan

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Amano K, Matsubara T, Tanaka T, Inoue H, Iwahashi M, Kanamono T, Nakano T, Uchimura S, Izumihara T, Yamazaki A, Karyekar CS, Takeuchi T; Japan Abatacept Study Group. Long-term safety and efficacy of treatment with subcutaneous abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are methotrexate inadequate responders. Mod Rheumatol. 2015 Sep;25(5):665-71. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2015.1012786.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Interventions

AbataceptInjections, Subcutaneous

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImmunoconjugatesAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsSerum GlobulinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsGlobulinsInjectionsDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeutics

Results Point of Contact

Title
Bristol-Myers Squibb Study Director
Organization
Bristol-Myers Squibb

Study Officials

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

    Bristol-Myers Squibb

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2009

First Posted

October 27, 2009

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion

February 1, 2011

Study Completion

October 1, 2012

Last Updated

February 6, 2014

Results First Posted

February 7, 2013

Record last verified: 2014-01

Locations