Safety and Dose Determining Multi-dose Study of BT062 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
A Phase I/IIa Multi-Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), Pharmacokinetics (PK), Safety and Efficacy of BT062 in Subjects With Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This Phase I/IIa clinical study is to test safety and anti-tumor activity of BT062 to define the best dose in treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with multiple doses of BT062.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 multiple-myeloma
Started Aug 2010
Typical duration for phase_1 multiple-myeloma
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 26, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 8, 2018
CompletedJuly 30, 2019
January 1, 2018
3.9 years
October 22, 2009
January 3, 2018
July 22, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) - Number of Participants With at Least 1 DLT
The primary safety variable was to determine the incidence of DLTs in subjects with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with BT062.
Starting with first study drug administration until 30-day follow-up visit (average 4.99 months)
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
The Phase I part of the study was to include the dose escalation cohort; a conventional dose escalation design, following 3 + 3 rules was chosen to define the MTD. Only DLTs occurring in cycle 1 for each subject were counted in the dose escalation decisions. Three subjects were treated at the first or newest dose level as available. If none of the 3 subjects experienced a DLT during Cycle 1, three subjects could be treated at the next dose level as available. In case of a DLT the cohort was expanded to up to 6 subjects. If not more than 1 of these 6 subjects experienced a DLT during Cycle 1, a first subject could be treated at the next dose level. If 2 or more of the 6 subjects experienced a DLT during Cycle 1 the dose escalation was stopped. The highest dose level at which \< 2 of 6 subjects experienced a DLT is defined as the MTD.
First 28-day cycle
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Qualitative and Quantitative Toxicities of BT062
Starting with first study drug administration until 30-day follow-up visit (average 4.99 months)
Multi-dose Pharmacokinetics Properties of BT062 - Cmax
Starting with first study drug administration until 30-day follow-up visit (average 4.99 months).
Anti-tumor Activity of BT062 in Subjects With Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma by Number of Participants With Objective Response(ORR) and/or Clinial Benefit(CBR) Based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria
On day 1 of each treatment cycle (on a monthly basis) starting with first study drug administration until Close Out visit (average 3.84 months).
Time to Progression (TTP), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS)
Starting with first study drug administration until death or 3 years from first study treatment.
Study Arms (1)
BT062
EXPERIMENTALBT062 was to be administered as single-dose IV infusions via a 0.22 μm in-line filter preferably in a forearm vein, according to medically accepted procedures on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Alternatively BT062 may have been administered through a central venous line or a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Other administration routes were only to be allowed after approval from Biotest. Each subject was to be monitored carefully for the effects of exposure to BT062. No subject was to have received more than 3 doses of BT062 per 28-day treatment cycle.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of active multiple myeloma according to the International Myeloma Working Group diagnostic criteria
- Relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
- Previous treatment with both an immunomodulator and a proteosome inhibitor therapy
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (Zubrod) ≤ 2
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document
- Ability to adhere with the study visit schedule and other protocol procedures
- Life expectancy of ≥ 12 weeks
- Normal organ and marrow function
You may not qualify if:
- Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 3 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to day 1 or those who have not recovered from AEs due to agents administered more than 3 weeks earlier
- Treatment with another investigational agent during the study or within 4 weeks before day 1
- Major surgery within 4 weeks before day 1 (this does not include placement of vascular access device or tumor biopsies)
- Antineoplastic therapy with biological agents within 2 weeks before day 1
- Known HAHAs, HACAs, or HAMAs in response to previous MAb therapy
- Previous treatment with BT062
- Malignancy within 3 years before day 1, other than the trial indication multiple myeloma and excluding treated non-melanoma skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer and carcinoma in-situ of the cervix
- Severe diseases of skin, colon, esophagus, or eye within 1 year before day 1, as judged by the Investigator
- Severe infections necessitating use of antibiotics / antivirals during the screening period
- Clinically relevant active infection including active hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HBV, HCV, or HIV) or any other concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for enrollment into this study
- Acute or relevant abnormalities in electrocardiogram (ECG), as judged by the Investigator. These abnormalities can be defined as recent myocardial infarction, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias and/or pronounced disturbances of the electrical conduction system of the heart.
- Significant cardiac disease such as recent myocardial infarction (≤ 6 months prior to day 1), unstable angina, uncontrolled congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension (recurrent or persistent increases in systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mm Hg), uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, grade 3 (Lown Criteria) or greater cardiac toxicity from prior chemotherapy
- History of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse
- Unwillingness or inability to adhere to the requirements of the study
- Concomitant therapy with corticosteroids (except as indicated in low dose for other medical conditions such as inhaled steroid for asthma, topical use, or as premedication for administration of certain medications (including BT062) or blood products and for treatment of infusion reactions if needed)
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Biotest Pharmaceuticals Corporationlead
- Biotestcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Emory University Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
The University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States
The Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Iris Bobenhausen
- Organization
- Biotest AG
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kenneth C. Anderson, MD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2009
First Posted
October 26, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 30, 2019
Results First Posted
May 8, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01