Study Stopped
Planned interim analysis showed worse outcomes in experimental group
Single-incision Laparoscopic (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Single-incision Laparoscopic (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Recent advances in laparoscopic instrumentation have made it possible to perform intra-abdominal operations entirely through a small incision that can be hidden within the umbilicus. The goal is to perform surgery with fewer incisions and no visible scars. Other potential benefits are faster recovery, less pain, and fewer wound complications. The term SILS (Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery) is being used to describe such techniques, and many have touted SILS as a major breakthrough in minimally-invasive surgery, moving the field closer to surgery that is bloodless, incisionless, and painless. Despite the hype, prospective comparisons of SILS versus conventional laparoscopy are lacking. Results of SILS procedures have generally been limited to case reports and small case series that lack controls. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of SILS appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy to treat acute appendicitis. Primary end-points are operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, recovery time, and long-term cosmetic outcome. The investigators hypothesize SILS appendectomy is equivalent to laparoscopic appendectomy with respect to operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, and recovery time while providing a better cosmetic outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 15, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 22, 2014
CompletedAugust 22, 2014
August 1, 2014
2.6 years
October 15, 2009
August 6, 2014
August 6, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain After Surgery
Mean pain score during 12 hours post-surgery, assessed by the ward nurse as needed, but at least every 4 hours, and documented in the patient's chart. Patients were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the most severe pain imaginable and 0 being no pain at all.
12 hours post-surgery
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Operative Time
up to 6 hours
Procedures Requiring Conversion to Open or Additional Port
during surgery , up to 6 hours
Visceral or Vascular Injury
during surgery, up to 6 hours
Length of Stay
up to 14 days
Wound Infection
6 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
SILS appendectomy
EXPERIMENTALThe study population will consist of patients who come to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain and are found to have acute appendicitis on the basis of clinical evaluation and CT of the abdomen/pelvis.
Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe study population will consist of patients who come to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain and are found to have acute appendicitis on the basis of clinical evaluation and CT of the abdomen/pelvis.
Interventions
conventional laparoscopic removal of the appendix
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Suspected acute appendicitis on clinical and radiographic (CT) grounds
You may not qualify if:
- Phlegmon, mass, peri-appendicecal abscess, or diffuse peritonitis
- Prior open laparotomy with incision through the umbilicus
- Body Mass Index \> 35
- Age \<18 years
- Mental illness, dementia, or inability to provide informed consent
- Chronic pain requiring daily medication (including opiate and NSAIDs)
- Pregnancy
- Alternative diagnosis found by diagnostic laparoscopy (post-randomization)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, San Franciscolead
- Medtronic - MITGcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
UCSF Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Related Publications (6)
Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P. Transumbilical endoscopic appendectomy in humans: on the road to NOTES: a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Aug;18(4):579-82. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0174.
PMID: 18721008BACKGROUNDChouillard K FA. Single incision appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience. In: SAGES 2009 Scientific Session, April 22-29, Phoenix, AZ (abstract only); 2009.
BACKGROUNDKravetz AJ ID, Kia MA. Initial experience in single-port laparoscopic appendectomies. SAGES 2009 Scientific Session, April 22-29, Phoenix, AZ (abstract only)
BACKGROUNDNguyen NT, Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Stamos MJ. A single-port technique for laparoscopic extended stapled appendectomy. Surg Innov. 2009 Mar;16(1):78-81. doi: 10.1177/1553350608330528. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
PMID: 19141492RESULTEdwards C BA. Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and results in excellent cosmetic outcomes. SAGES 2009 Scientific Session, April 22-29, Phoenix, AZ (abstract only) 2009.
RESULTCarter JT, Kaplan JA, Nguyen JN, Lin MY, Rogers SJ, Harris HW. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):950-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.052. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
PMID: 24684867DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jonathan T. Carter, MD, FACS
- Organization
- University of California, San Francisco
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan T. Carter, M.D.
UCSF Department of Surgery
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2009
First Posted
October 19, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 22, 2014
Results First Posted
August 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08