The Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II: A Randomized Trial Comparing Oral Voriconazole vs Placebo
MUTTII
2 other identifiers
interventional
240
3 countries
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of oral voriconazole to topical treatment regimens results in lower rates of perforation in severe fungal corneal ulcers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 14, 2017
CompletedFebruary 26, 2019
February 1, 2019
5.7 years
October 14, 2009
June 9, 2016
February 4, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Perforation or Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty
Hazard ratio of perforation or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) comparing voriconazole to placebo
3 months from enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Best Spectacle-corrected logMAR Visual Acuity
3 months after enrollment
Best Spectacle-corrected logMAR Visual Acuity at 3-weeks
3 weeks after enrollment
Size of Infiltrate/Scar - 3 Months
3 months after enrollment
Size of Infiltrate/Scar
3 weeks after enrollment
Hazard Ratio for Re-epithelialization
Up to 21 days
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Oral Voriconazole
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
1% voriconazole (topical) plus 0.01% preservative, 1 drop applied to the affected eye every one hour while awake for 1 week, then every 2 hours while awake until three weeks after enrollment. 5% natamycin (topical), 1 drop applied to the affected eye every one hour while awake for 1 week, then every 2 hours while awake until three weeks after enrollment. 400 mg BID PO on study day one (loading dose), then 200 mg BID PO until 3 weeks from enrollment for patients weighing greater than 50 kg. For patients 40-50 kg, the loading dose is 300 mg BID PO on study day 1, then 150 mg BID PO until 3 weeks from enrollment. For patients weighing \<40 kg, the loading dose is 200 mg BID PO, then 100 mg BID PO until 3 weeks after enrollment.
1% voriconazole (topical) plus 0.01% preservative, 1 drop applied to the affected eye every one hour while awake for 1 week, then every 2 hours while awake until three weeks after enrollment. 5% natamycin (topical), 1 drop applied to the affected eye every one hour while awake for 1 week, then every 2 hours while awake until three weeks after enrollment. Two tablets BID PO on study day one, then one tablet BID PO until 3 weeks from enrollment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of a corneal ulcer at presentation
- Evidence of filamentous fungus on smear (KOH wet mount, Giemsa, or Gram stain)
- Visual acuity worse than 6/120 (20/400, logMAR 1.3)
- The patient must be able to verbalize a basic understanding of the study after it is explained to the patient, as determined by physician examiner. This understanding must include a commitment to return for follow-up visits.
- Willingness to be treated as an inpatient or to be treated as an outpatient and return every 3 days +/- 1 day until re-epithelialization and every week to receive fresh medication for 3 weeks
- Appropriate consent
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of bacteria on Gram stain at the time of enrollment
- Evidence of acanthamoeba by stain
- Evidence of herpetic keratitis by history or exam
- Corneal scar not easily distinguishable from current ulcer
- Age less than 16 years (before 16th birthday)
- Bilateral ulcers
- Previous penetrating keratoplasty in the affected eye
- Pregnancy (by history or urine test) or breast feeding (by history)
- Known liver disease, including hepatitis or cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A-C)
- Acuity worse than 6/60 (2/200) in the fellow eye (note that any acuity, uncorrected, corrected, pinhole, or BSCVA 6/60 or better qualifies for enrollment)
- Acuity better than 6/120 (20/400) in the study eye (note that any acuity, uncorrected, corrected, pinhole, or BSCVA can be used for enrollment)
- Currently on rifampin, rifabutin, ritonavir, long acting barbiturates, phenytoin, carbamazepine, or other drugs known to interact with voriconazole
- Known allergy to study medications (antifungal or preservative)
- No light perception in the affected eye
- Not willing to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, San Franciscolead
- Aravind Eye Hospitals, Indiacollaborator
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centercollaborator
- Lumbini Eye Institute and Research Centrecollaborator
- Bharatpur Eye Hospitalcollaborator
- National Eye Institute (NEI)collaborator
Study Sites (7)
Proctor Foundation, UCSF
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Aravind Eye Hospital
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Aravind Eye Hospitals
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
Aravind Eye Hospital
Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, India
Aravind Eye Hospital
Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India
Bharatpur Eye Hospital
Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal
Lumbini Eye Institute
Siddharthanagar, Lumbini, Nepal
Related Publications (1)
Zegans ME, Kamath MM, Jones JT, Bao R, Ross BS, Gutierrez-Perez C, Adams EM, Lightfoot JD, Poimenidou G, Pavuluri C, Prajna V, Cramer RA, Fuller KK. Propranolol is efficacious against Aspergillus and Fusarium corneal isolates in vitro and in a murine model of Aspergillus keratitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Jun 4;69(6):e0166424. doi: 10.1128/aac.01664-24. Epub 2025 May 15.
PMID: 40372030DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kathryn Ray
- Organization
- University of California, San Francisco
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
NV Prajna, DNB, FRC Ophth
Aravind Eye Hospitals
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nisha Acharya, MD, MS
Proctor Foundation, UCSF
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tom Lietman, MD
Proctor Foundation, UCSF
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in Residence
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2009
First Posted
October 16, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 26, 2019
Results First Posted
June 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2019-02