NCT00996736

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if natamycin or voriconazole results in better visual outcomes in fungal corneal ulcers, especially visual acuity.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
323

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2010

Geographic Reach
2 countries

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 14, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 16, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2010

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 11, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

October 14, 2009

Results QC Date

July 26, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 6, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Fungal InfectionsEye DiseaseFungal KeratitisVisual Acuity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Best Spectacle-corrected logMAR Visual Acuity

    The primary analysis is best spectacle-corrected logMAR (logarithm of the Minimum Angle or Resolution) visual acuity, correcting for enrollment BSCVA and treatment arm in a multiple linear regression model. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin is less than 1.5 lines logMAR acuity. (Adjusted three-month visual acuity confidence bounds for the difference between the voriconazole and natamycin groups which meet or exceed 0.15 logMAR units would not permit noninferiority to be declared.) Note that this design also allows declaration of superiority (2-sided alpha of 0.05, corrected for an interim analysis).

    3 months from enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Best Spectacle-corrected logMAR Visual Acuity

    3 weeks after enrollment

  • Hard Contact Lens-corrected Visual Acuity Measured in logMAR

    3 months after enrollment

  • Size of Infiltrate/Scar

    3 weeks and 3 months after enrollment

  • Time to Resolution of Epithelial Defect

    From enrollment to the time of resolution of epithelial defect

  • Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Isolates

    3 months after enrollment

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Topical Natamycin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Natamycin

Topical Voriconazole

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Voriconazole

Interventions

5% natamycin plus 0.02% preservative, one drop to the affected eye every one hour while awake for 1 week, then every 2 hours while awake until 3 weeks after enrollment.

Topical Natamycin

1% voriconazole plus 0.01% preservative, 1 drop applied to the affected eye every one hour while awake for 1 week, then every 2 hours while awake until three weeks after enrollment.

Topical Voriconazole

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Presence of a corneal ulcer at presentation
  • Evidence of filamentous fungus on smear (KOH wet mount, Giemsa, or Gram stain)
  • Visual acuity between 6/12 (20/40, logMAR 0.3) and 6/120 (20/400, logMAR 1.3)
  • The patient must be able to verbalize a basic understanding of the study after it is explained to the patient, as determined by physician examiner. This understanding must include a commitment to return for follow-up visits.
  • Willingness to be treated as an inpatient or to be treated as an outpatient and return every 3 days +/- 1 day until re-epithelialization and every week to receive fresh medication for 3 weeks
  • Appropriate consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Impending perforation
  • Evidence of bacteria on Gram stain at the time of enrollment
  • Evidence of acanthamoeba by stain
  • Evidence of herpetic keratitis by history or exam
  • Corneal scar not easily distinguishable from current ulcer
  • Age less than 16 years (before 16th birthday)
  • Bilateral ulcers
  • Previous penetrating keratoplasty in the affected eye
  • Pregnancy (by history or urine test) or breast feeding (by history)
  • Acuity worse than 6/60 (2/200) in the fellow eye (note that any acuity, uncorrected, corrected, pinhole, or BSCVA 6/60 or better qualifies for enrollment)
  • Acuity worse than 6/120 (20/400) or better than 6/12 (20/40) in the study eye (note that any acuity, uncorrected, corrected, pinhole, or BSCVA can be used for enrollment)
  • Known allergy to study medications (antifungal or preservative)
  • No light perception in the affected eye
  • Not willing to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Proctor Foundation, UCSF

San Francisco, California, 94143, United States

Location

Aravind Eye Hospitals

Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

Location

Aravind Eye Hospital

Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, India

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Prajna L, Srinivasan M, Raghavan A, Oldenburg CE, Ray KJ, Zegans ME, McLeod SD, Porco TC, Acharya NR, Lietman TM; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. The mycotic ulcer treatment trial: a randomized trial comparing natamycin vs voriconazole. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;131(4):422-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1497.

    PMID: 23710492BACKGROUND
  • Prajna NV, Lalitha P, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R, Radnakrishnan N, Srinivasan M, Devi L, Das M, Liu Z, Zegans ME, Acharya NR, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Patterns of Antifungal Resistance in Adult Patients With Fungal Keratitis in South India: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 1;140(2):179-184. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.5765.

  • Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R, Patel S, Shah R, Srinivasan M, Das M, Ray KJ, Oldenburg CE, McLeod SD, Zegans ME, Acharya NR, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. Predictors of Corneal Perforation or Need for Therapeutic Keratoplasty in Severe Fungal Keratitis: A Secondary Analysis of the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 1;135(9):987-991. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.2914.

  • Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R, Patel S, Shah R, Srinivasan M, Devi L, Das M, Ray KJ, O'Brien KS, Oldenburg CE, McLeod SD, Zegans ME, Acharya NR, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. Adjunctive Oral Voriconazole Treatment of Fusarium Keratitis: A Secondary Analysis From the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 1;135(6):520-525. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0616.

  • Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R, Patel S, Srinivasan M, Das M, Ray KJ, O'Brien KS, Oldenburg CE, McLeod SD, Zegans ME, Porco TC, Acharya NR, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II Group. Effect of Oral Voriconazole on Fungal Keratitis in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II (MUTT II): A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12):1365-1372. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4096.

  • Prajna NV, Lalitha P, Rajaraman R, Krishnan T, Raghavan A, Srinivasan M, O'Brien KS, Zegans M, McLeod SD, Acharya NR, Keenan JD, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. Changing Azole Resistance: A Secondary Analysis of the MUTT I Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;134(6):693-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0530.

  • Rose-Nussbaumer J, Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Srinivasan M, Raghavan A, Oldenburg CE, O'Brien KS, Ray KJ, Porco TC, McLeod SD, Acharya NR, Keenan JD, Lietman TM; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. Risk factors for low vision related functioning in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial: a randomised trial comparing natamycin with voriconazole. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;100(7):929-932. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306828. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

  • Rose-Nussbaumer J, Prajna NV, Krishnan KT, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Srinivasan M, Raghavan A, Oldenburg CE, O'Brien KS, Ray KJ, McLeod SD, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Acharya NR, Keenan JD; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I Group. Vision-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;133(6):642-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0319.

  • Sun CQ, Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Srinivasan M, Raghavan A, O'Brien KS, Ray KJ, McLeod SD, Porco TC, Acharya NR, Lietman TM. Expert prior elicitation and Bayesian analysis of the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jun 14;54(6):4167-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11716.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Corneal UlcerEye Infections, FungalMycosesEye Diseases

Interventions

NatamycinVoriconazole

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye InfectionsInfectionsKeratitisCorneal DiseasesBacterial Infections and Mycoses

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MacrolidesLactonesOrganic ChemicalsTriazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Thomas Lietman
Organization
F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of Califonia, San Francisco

Study Officials

  • NV Prajna, DNB, FRC Ophth

    Aravind Eye Hospitals

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Nisha Acharya, MD, MS

    Proctor Foundation, UCSF

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Tom Lietman, MD

    Proctor Foundation, UCSF

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor in Residence

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2009

First Posted

October 16, 2009

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion

July 1, 2012

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

August 1, 2018

Results First Posted

December 11, 2013

Record last verified: 2018-07

Locations