Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I
MUTT I
2 other identifiers
interventional
323
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if natamycin or voriconazole results in better visual outcomes in fungal corneal ulcers, especially visual acuity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2010
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 11, 2013
CompletedAugust 1, 2018
July 1, 2018
2.3 years
October 14, 2009
July 26, 2013
July 6, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Best Spectacle-corrected logMAR Visual Acuity
The primary analysis is best spectacle-corrected logMAR (logarithm of the Minimum Angle or Resolution) visual acuity, correcting for enrollment BSCVA and treatment arm in a multiple linear regression model. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin is less than 1.5 lines logMAR acuity. (Adjusted three-month visual acuity confidence bounds for the difference between the voriconazole and natamycin groups which meet or exceed 0.15 logMAR units would not permit noninferiority to be declared.) Note that this design also allows declaration of superiority (2-sided alpha of 0.05, corrected for an interim analysis).
3 months from enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Best Spectacle-corrected logMAR Visual Acuity
3 weeks after enrollment
Hard Contact Lens-corrected Visual Acuity Measured in logMAR
3 months after enrollment
Size of Infiltrate/Scar
3 weeks and 3 months after enrollment
Time to Resolution of Epithelial Defect
From enrollment to the time of resolution of epithelial defect
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Isolates
3 months after enrollment
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Topical Natamycin
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical Voriconazole
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
5% natamycin plus 0.02% preservative, one drop to the affected eye every one hour while awake for 1 week, then every 2 hours while awake until 3 weeks after enrollment.
1% voriconazole plus 0.01% preservative, 1 drop applied to the affected eye every one hour while awake for 1 week, then every 2 hours while awake until three weeks after enrollment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of a corneal ulcer at presentation
- Evidence of filamentous fungus on smear (KOH wet mount, Giemsa, or Gram stain)
- Visual acuity between 6/12 (20/40, logMAR 0.3) and 6/120 (20/400, logMAR 1.3)
- The patient must be able to verbalize a basic understanding of the study after it is explained to the patient, as determined by physician examiner. This understanding must include a commitment to return for follow-up visits.
- Willingness to be treated as an inpatient or to be treated as an outpatient and return every 3 days +/- 1 day until re-epithelialization and every week to receive fresh medication for 3 weeks
- Appropriate consent
You may not qualify if:
- Impending perforation
- Evidence of bacteria on Gram stain at the time of enrollment
- Evidence of acanthamoeba by stain
- Evidence of herpetic keratitis by history or exam
- Corneal scar not easily distinguishable from current ulcer
- Age less than 16 years (before 16th birthday)
- Bilateral ulcers
- Previous penetrating keratoplasty in the affected eye
- Pregnancy (by history or urine test) or breast feeding (by history)
- Acuity worse than 6/60 (2/200) in the fellow eye (note that any acuity, uncorrected, corrected, pinhole, or BSCVA 6/60 or better qualifies for enrollment)
- Acuity worse than 6/120 (20/400) or better than 6/12 (20/40) in the study eye (note that any acuity, uncorrected, corrected, pinhole, or BSCVA can be used for enrollment)
- Known allergy to study medications (antifungal or preservative)
- No light perception in the affected eye
- Not willing to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, San Franciscolead
- Aravind Eye Hospitals, Indiacollaborator
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centercollaborator
- National Eye Institute (NEI)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Proctor Foundation, UCSF
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Aravind Eye Hospitals
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
Aravind Eye Hospital
Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, India
Related Publications (9)
Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Prajna L, Srinivasan M, Raghavan A, Oldenburg CE, Ray KJ, Zegans ME, McLeod SD, Porco TC, Acharya NR, Lietman TM; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. The mycotic ulcer treatment trial: a randomized trial comparing natamycin vs voriconazole. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;131(4):422-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1497.
PMID: 23710492BACKGROUNDPrajna NV, Lalitha P, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R, Radnakrishnan N, Srinivasan M, Devi L, Das M, Liu Z, Zegans ME, Acharya NR, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Patterns of Antifungal Resistance in Adult Patients With Fungal Keratitis in South India: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 1;140(2):179-184. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.5765.
PMID: 35024776DERIVEDPrajna NV, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R, Patel S, Shah R, Srinivasan M, Das M, Ray KJ, Oldenburg CE, McLeod SD, Zegans ME, Acharya NR, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. Predictors of Corneal Perforation or Need for Therapeutic Keratoplasty in Severe Fungal Keratitis: A Secondary Analysis of the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 1;135(9):987-991. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.2914.
PMID: 28817744DERIVEDPrajna NV, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R, Patel S, Shah R, Srinivasan M, Devi L, Das M, Ray KJ, O'Brien KS, Oldenburg CE, McLeod SD, Zegans ME, Acharya NR, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. Adjunctive Oral Voriconazole Treatment of Fusarium Keratitis: A Secondary Analysis From the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 1;135(6):520-525. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0616.
PMID: 28426856DERIVEDPrajna NV, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R, Patel S, Srinivasan M, Das M, Ray KJ, O'Brien KS, Oldenburg CE, McLeod SD, Zegans ME, Porco TC, Acharya NR, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II Group. Effect of Oral Voriconazole on Fungal Keratitis in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II (MUTT II): A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12):1365-1372. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4096.
PMID: 27787540DERIVEDPrajna NV, Lalitha P, Rajaraman R, Krishnan T, Raghavan A, Srinivasan M, O'Brien KS, Zegans M, McLeod SD, Acharya NR, Keenan JD, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. Changing Azole Resistance: A Secondary Analysis of the MUTT I Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;134(6):693-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0530.
PMID: 27054515DERIVEDRose-Nussbaumer J, Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Srinivasan M, Raghavan A, Oldenburg CE, O'Brien KS, Ray KJ, Porco TC, McLeod SD, Acharya NR, Keenan JD, Lietman TM; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. Risk factors for low vision related functioning in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial: a randomised trial comparing natamycin with voriconazole. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;100(7):929-932. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306828. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
PMID: 26531051DERIVEDRose-Nussbaumer J, Prajna NV, Krishnan KT, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Srinivasan M, Raghavan A, Oldenburg CE, O'Brien KS, Ray KJ, McLeod SD, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Acharya NR, Keenan JD; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I Group. Vision-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;133(6):642-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0319.
PMID: 25764482DERIVEDSun CQ, Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Srinivasan M, Raghavan A, O'Brien KS, Ray KJ, McLeod SD, Porco TC, Acharya NR, Lietman TM. Expert prior elicitation and Bayesian analysis of the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jun 14;54(6):4167-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11716.
PMID: 23702779DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Thomas Lietman
- Organization
- F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of Califonia, San Francisco
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
NV Prajna, DNB, FRC Ophth
Aravind Eye Hospitals
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nisha Acharya, MD, MS
Proctor Foundation, UCSF
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tom Lietman, MD
Proctor Foundation, UCSF
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in Residence
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2009
First Posted
October 16, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 1, 2018
Results First Posted
December 11, 2013
Record last verified: 2018-07