Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of NeoFuse in Subjects Requiring Lumbar Interbody Fusion
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Study Evaluating Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of NeoFuse When Combined With MasterGraft Matrix in Subjects Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Instrumentation
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of NeoFuse in subjects with a diagnosis of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in 1 or 2 adjacent vertebral levels between L1 and S1. All subjects in this study will undergo interbody fusion via Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) or Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) procedures with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved/cleared supplemental posterior instrumentation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Sep 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_2
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedJune 29, 2020
June 1, 2020
2.8 years
October 9, 2009
June 25, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine the overall safety of NeoFuse plus carrier using physical examinations, vital signs, treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and the results of clinical lab tests (hematology, serum chemistry, inflammation, and immunology).
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the overall fusion success with NeoFuse plus carrier compared to autograft using CT scans and x-ray of the involved lumbar spine levels and assess the change in outcomes (ODI, SF-36, and WPAI) and pain (VAS)at the 12-month follow-up visit.
3 years
Study Arms (3)
Autograft
ACTIVE COMPARATORLumbar Interbody Fusion with Autograft
Low Dose
EXPERIMENTALLumbar Interbody Fusion with NeoFuse-Low Dose
High Dose
EXPERIMENTALLumbar Interbody Fusion with NeoFuse-High Dose
Interventions
Single Dose Autograft Surgical Implantation
Single Dose NeoFuse Surgical Implantation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or females at least 18 years of age, but not older than 70.
- Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study, to provide written informed consent, and to comply with the study protocol.
- Have the ability to understand and provide written authorization for the use and disclosure of personal health information (PHI) \[per Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy ruling in the US\].
- Have a documented symptomatic diagnosis of DDD at L1-S1 with or without stenosis and with or without up to and including Grade II degenerative spondylolisthesis.
- Have clinical symptoms of neurogenic claudication.
- Have failed 6 months of non-operative low back pain management.
- Are candidates for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in combination with posterior pedicle screw stabilization and require surgery at a 1 or 2 adjacent vertebral levels between L1 and S1.
- Have a stable screening electrocardiogram (ECG), as determined by the investigator that would not preclude surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing, or women planning to become pregnant during the first year (12 months) following surgery.
- Male subjects with partners of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (barrier method or abstinence) from the time of surgery and for a period of at least 1 year after surgery.
- Have a current or prior history within the last 3 years of neoplasm (excluding basal cell carcinoma) and/or any active neoplasm within the last 24 months, prior to screening.
- Have osteoporosis as defined by a DEXA T score of ≤ -3.0 or a history of fragility fractures or other significant bone disease contraindicating the use of spinal instrumentation.
- Have a documented medical history or radiographic evidence of a metabolic bone disease or other condition which would negatively impact the bone healing process.
- Have a positive screen for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies.
- Have had treatment with any investigational therapy or device within 6 months of study surgery and/or plans to participate in any other allogeneic stem cell/progenitor cell therapy trial during the 3-year follow-up period.
- Have been a recipient of prior stem cell/progenitor cell therapy for spinal fusion surgery.
- Have a body mass index (BMI) \> 35.
- Have 20% or greater anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody titer and/or has antibody specificities to donor HLA antigens.
- Are transient or has been treated in the last 6 months before enrollment for alcohol and/or drug abuse in an inpatient substance abuse program.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mesoblast, Ltd.lead
Study Sites (5)
The Spine Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States
Denver Spine
Greenwood Village, Colorado, 80111, United States
Rocky Mountain Associates in Orthopedic Medicine, P.C.
Loveland, Colorado, 80538, United States
Fort Wayne Orthopaedics
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804, United States
Central Texas Spine Institute
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roger Brown
Senior Vice President of Musculoskeletal Repair
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2009
First Posted
October 16, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06