Esomeprazole or Famotidine in the Management of Aspirin Related Non-Ulcer Dyspepsia
1 other identifier
interventional
128
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Aspirin can prevent ischemic vascular disease but is commonly complicated by dyspepsia in 30% of patients. Patients, who have aspirin related dyspepsia, commonly underwent upper endoscopy to exclude peptic ulcer disease or gastric cancers. For those without significant lesions in the stomach and duodenum (non-ulcer dyspepsia), the best approach in the management is unclear. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of esomeprazole and famotidine in the control of dyspeptic symptom. After giving consent, patients will be randomised to receive either esomeprazole 20 mg daily or famotidine 40 mg daily in a double blinded manner. The patient will be followed-up at the 2nd and 4th week. The study will be completed at the 4th week. The primary analysis will be the efficacy in the control of dyspepsia symptom between the two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedJune 6, 2012
June 1, 2012
4.3 years
September 15, 2009
June 5, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment success : The HKDI is less than 16. Treatment was considered to have failed if a patient had taken medication for dyspepsia (other than antacids) during the study period
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Treatment success: no significant dyspepsia defined by the Global Dyspepsia Score
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
esomeprazole
ACTIVE COMPARATOResomeprazole 20 mg
Famotidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORfamotidine 40 mg
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- at least moderate pain or discomfort (or both) centered in the upper abdomen as their predominant symptoms for 7 days before randomization; taking low dose aspirin (80-300 mg daily),and insignificant upper endoscopic finding. At least moderate pain or discomfort is defined if the HKDI was more than or equal to 16.
- H. Pylori: In patients with have successful eradication of H. pylori and had dyspepsia with HKDI \>=16 at the 6th week after eradication therapy can be recruited.In patients without H. pylori infection, they can be recruited immediately.
You may not qualify if:
- non-Chinese speaking
- significant endoscopic finding
- typical biliary colic
- predominant heartburn or symptoms of the irritable bowel syndrome
- a history of peptic ulcer or gastroesophageal reflux
- unintentional weight loss previous gastric or duodenal surgery
- thrombocytopenia
- renal failure with estimated creatinine clearance less than 10 ml/min
- active cancer
- known allergic to aspirin, famotidine or esomeprazole
- pregnancy, lactation, child-bearing potential in the absence of contraception
- planned co-prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- corticosteroid, clopidogrel or anticoagulant
- anxiety neurosis, depression, psychosomatic disorder
- investigation for dyspepsia with endoscopy or barium series before aspirin therapy or disorders that might modify the absorption of study drugs
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ruttonjee Hospitallead
- Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kongcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Queen Mary Hospital
Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
Ruttonjee Hospital
Hong Kong, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
FH Ng, MD
Ruttonjee Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- CON
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2009
First Posted
September 16, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 6, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06