NCT00966186

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two insertion techniques of large size ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. We hypothesized that insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with 90-degree rotation would reduce the contact surface between the device and pharyngeal wall and make it easy to advance the device over the smooth angle against the posterior pharyngeal wall.We compared the success rate and incidence of complication of the standard technique with the rotational technique.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2008

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2008

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2009

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2009

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 20, 2009

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 26, 2009

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 16, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

August 16, 2010

Status Verified

July 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

August 20, 2009

Results QC Date

January 4, 2010

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

ProSeal Laryngeal Mask AirwayRotational techniqueSuccess ratePostoperative complications

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Success of Insertion at First Attempt

    5 minute

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Insertion Time, Sealing Pressure and Complication

    5 min - 4 hours

Study Arms (2)

Standard technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Proseal laryngeal mask airway was inserted according to the manufacture's instruction manual (insertion with help of index finger insertion)

Procedure: Insertion fo ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

Rotational technique

EXPERIMENTAL

The entire cuff of the PLMA was placed in the mouth without finger insertion in a midline approach and was rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise around the tongue. The PLMA was then advanced and rotated back until resistance was fel

Procedure: Insertion fo ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

Interventions

Insertion fo ProSeal laryngeal mask airway using each of Standard technique or Rotational technique

Rotational techniqueStandard technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age27 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II

You may not qualify if:

  • Predicted difficult airway
  • Mouth opening less than 2.5 cm
  • Present sore throat
  • High risk of aspiration

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Jeon YT, Na HS, Park SH, Oh AY, Park HP, Yun MJ, Kim JH, Hwang JW. Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90 degrees rotation technique. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Mar;57(3):211-5. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9241-4. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Complications

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

First, as the PLMAs were inserted by two anesthesiologists who were experts in PLMA insertion, these results may not apply to novices. Second, the insertion technique was impossible to blind the anesthesiologists, which might be a source of bias.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jung-Won Hwang
Organization
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study Officials

  • Jung-won Hwang, MD

    Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2009

First Posted

August 26, 2009

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion

April 1, 2009

Study Completion

May 1, 2009

Last Updated

August 16, 2010

Results First Posted

August 16, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-07

Locations