The Rotational Insertion Technique for ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
The 90-degree Rotational Insertion Technique for the Large Size ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two insertion techniques of large size ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. We hypothesized that insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with 90-degree rotation would reduce the contact surface between the device and pharyngeal wall and make it easy to advance the device over the smooth angle against the posterior pharyngeal wall.We compared the success rate and incidence of complication of the standard technique with the rotational technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 16, 2010
CompletedAugust 16, 2010
July 1, 2010
5 months
August 20, 2009
January 4, 2010
July 21, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success of Insertion at First Attempt
5 minute
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Insertion Time, Sealing Pressure and Complication
5 min - 4 hours
Study Arms (2)
Standard technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORProseal laryngeal mask airway was inserted according to the manufacture's instruction manual (insertion with help of index finger insertion)
Rotational technique
EXPERIMENTALThe entire cuff of the PLMA was placed in the mouth without finger insertion in a midline approach and was rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise around the tongue. The PLMA was then advanced and rotated back until resistance was fel
Interventions
Insertion fo ProSeal laryngeal mask airway using each of Standard technique or Rotational technique
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II
You may not qualify if:
- Predicted difficult airway
- Mouth opening less than 2.5 cm
- Present sore throat
- High risk of aspiration
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Jeon YT, Na HS, Park SH, Oh AY, Park HP, Yun MJ, Kim JH, Hwang JW. Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90 degrees rotation technique. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Mar;57(3):211-5. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9241-4. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
PMID: 20077171DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
First, as the PLMAs were inserted by two anesthesiologists who were experts in PLMA insertion, these results may not apply to novices. Second, the insertion technique was impossible to blind the anesthesiologists, which might be a source of bias.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jung-Won Hwang
- Organization
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jung-won Hwang, MD
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2009
First Posted
August 26, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
May 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 16, 2010
Results First Posted
August 16, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-07