Comparison of Prosthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass Versus Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Symptomatic Femoral Artery Occlusion
A Retrospective Review of Randomized Comparison of Prosthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass Versus Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Symptomatic Femoral Artery Occlusion With Four Years Followup
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A retrospective review with four year followup on patients that had previously been enrolled in a study to evaluate blockages in the lower legs. The study looked at patients that had undergone a bypass of the leg from the groin to the knee area with an incision in each area using general anesthesia. These patients were compared to others who had undergone treatment with balloon dilatation and stents in the arteries in the thighs with only numbing medicine. The study was completed two years ago and was initially designed to look at outcomes at 24 months. Now the investigators are trying to go back and look at outcomes of these patients' treatment at 4 years by simply reviewing their records.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2003
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2009
CompletedAugust 20, 2009
August 1, 2009
3.7 years
August 19, 2009
August 19, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary artery/graft patency
48 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Secondary artery/graft patency
48 months
Limb salvage
48 months
Improvement of lower extremity ischemic symptoms
48 months
Study Arms (2)
Surgical Bypass Group
Those patients that underwent bypass of blockage in the thigh with surgery.
Stent-graft group
Patients that underwent treatment of blockage in the thigh with balloon angioplasty and stent placement.
Interventions
Patients that underwent treatment of blockage in the thigh arteries with balloon angioplasty with stent-graft placement.
Eligibility Criteria
Vascular surgery clinic patients with ischemic symtpom of the lower extremities. Patients were previously enrolled in a randomized prospective study comparing treatment of blockage in the legs with a surgical bypass or percutaneous covered stent placemnt.
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic lower extremity ischemia patients treated by femoral-popliteal bypass or percutaneous covered stent graft in previous prospective study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Texas Vascular Associateslead
- W.L.Gore & Associatescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Texas Vascular Associates
Dallas, Texas, 75226, United States
Related Publications (4)
Alimi YS, Hakam Z, Hartung O, Boufi M, Barthelemy P, Aissi K, Dubuc M. Efficacy of Viabahn in the treatment of severe superficial femoral artery lesions: which factors influence long-term patency? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Mar;35(3):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
PMID: 17983772BACKGROUNDFischer M, Schwabe C, Schulte KL. Value of the hemobahn/viabahn endoprosthesis in the treatment of long chronic lesions of the superficial femoral artery: 6 years of experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2006 Jun;13(3):281-90. doi: 10.1583/05-1799.1.
PMID: 16784314BACKGROUNDMcQuade K, Gable D, Hohman S, Pearl G, Theune B. Randomized comparison of ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft vs prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):109-15, 116.e1-9; discussion 116. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.041. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
PMID: 19028055RESULTKedora J, Hohmann S, Garrett W, Munschaur C, Theune B, Gable D. Randomized comparison of percutaneous Viabahn stent grafts vs prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):10-6; discussion 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.074. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
PMID: 17126520RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dennis R Gable, M.D.
Texas Vascular Associates
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2009
First Posted
August 20, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2003
Primary Completion
May 1, 2007
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 20, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-08