Improvement of Sensibility in the Foot in Diabetic Patients Induced by EMLA-application to the Lower Leg
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sensory input from the foot as well as all other body parts results in activation of sensory cortex. It is well known that the cortical body map is experienced-dependant and can rapidly change in response to changes in activity and sensory input from the periphery \[10-12\]. Increased activity and sensory input from the hand results in expansion of the cortical hand representation \[13-15\], while decreased sensory input, for instance by anaesthesia, amputation or nerve injury, results in shrinkage of the cortical hand representation \[16-21\]. Due to the constant ongoing "cortical competition" between body parts the adjacent cortical areas expand and take over the silent area, deprived of sensory input. The investigators have recently described striking examples of such rapid cortical re-organisations induced by selective cutaneous anaesthesia of the forearm: application of EMLA cream to the volar aspect of the forearm results in improved sensory functions of the hand \[18\] linked to expansion of the hand representational area in sensory cortex . In analogy, EMLA application to the lower leg in healthy controls results in improved sensory functions in the sole of the foot linked to expansion of the foot representational area in sensory cortex. To test the hypothesis that EMLA application to the lower leg of diabetic patients will result in improved sensory functions in the sole of the foot as well as expansion of the foot representation in sensory cortex. The investigators hypothesize that repeated applications of EMLA will result in a long lasting sensibility improvement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus
Started Nov 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedDecember 16, 2013
December 1, 2013
1.2 years
August 12, 2009
December 13, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Touch thresholds in the sole of the foot (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments)
Screening, before application, 90 min after application, 24 hours after application
Secondary Outcomes (2)
MRI
MRI-examination, before application, 90 min after application, 24 hours after application
fMRI
fMRI-examination, before application, 90 min after application, 24 hours after application
Study Arms (2)
EMLA cream
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo cream
PLACEBO COMPARATORA placebo cream identical in appearance and consistency to the experimental cream
Interventions
The study subjects are treated either by 50 g of a local anesthetic agent containing 2.5% Lidocaine and 2.5% Prilocaine (EMLA®, AstraZeneca - Södertälje, Sweden) or a placebo cream, applied to the lower leg. The cream is applied under occlusive bandage (plastic foam and a tube) for 1.5 hours circumferential to the lower leg 10-12 cm distally of the tibial tuberosity and the malleolus at ankle level. Administration of the treatment cream as well as removal after 1,5 hour and at sensory assessment after 1.5 hour and 24 hours, and interviewing the patient about subjective experience from the treatment are performed by an independent research nurse, not involved in the sensory assessment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (18-75 years) suffering from diabetes with subjective sensory impairment in the sole of the foot.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with painful neuropathy or established ulcer formation in toes or sole of the foot, known hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics, major vascular reconstructions, communication problems due to severe language problems.
- Patients with pacemakers or magnetic implants or suffering from claustrophobia will not be subjected to fMRI-investigation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Hand Surgery, Malmö University Hospital
Malmo, SE-205 02, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
Lundborg GN, Bjorkman AC, Rosen BN, Nilsson JA, Dahlin LB. Cutaneous anaesthesia of the lower leg can improve sensibility in the diabetic foot. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Diabet Med. 2010 Jul;27(7):823-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03014.x.
PMID: 20636964RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Göran Lundborg, Professor
Dpt of Hand Surgery, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Göran Lundborg
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2009
First Posted
August 14, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2008
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 16, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-12