Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone and Metformin Combination Therapy in Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
A Phase 3b, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone HCl and Metformin HCl Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy Compared to Pioglitazone HCl Monotherapy and to Metformin HCl Monotherapy in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
2 other identifiers
interventional
600
4 countries
77
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of pioglitazone, twice daily (BID), combined with metformin versus pioglitazone taken alone and metformin taken alone in treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus
Started Jun 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus
77 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 9, 2010
CompletedJuly 29, 2011
July 1, 2011
1.2 years
July 30, 2008
August 28, 2009
July 27, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin
The change between the value of Glycosylated Hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at final visit or week 24 and Glycosylated Hemoglobin collected at baseline.
Baseline and Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (26)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose
Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin
Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment - Insulin Resistance
Baseline and Week 24
Median Percent Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein
Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
Baseline and Week 24
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Pioglitazone 15 mg /Metformin 850 mg BID
EXPERIMENTALPioglitazone 15 mg BID
ACTIVE COMPARATORMetformin 850 mg BID
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Pioglitazone 15 mg /metformin 850 mg combination, tablets, orally, twice daily for up to 24 weeks.
Pioglitazone 15 mg, tablets, orally, twice daily for up to 24 weeks.
Metformin 850 mg, tablets, orally, twice daily for up to 24 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has type 2 diabetes.
- Has received no treatment with antidiabetic medication in the 12 weeks prior to Screening, other than short-term use defined as less than or equal to 15 days.
- A glycosylated hemoglobin greater than or equal to 7.5% and less than or equal to 10.0% at Screening.
- Body mass index less than or equal to 45 kg/m2.
- Has received counseling on lifestyle modification for type 2 diabetes, including diet and exercise.
- Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
- Stable condition as determined by a physician.
You may not qualify if:
- Type 1 diabetes.
- Unstable angina or heart failure of any etiology with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV.
- History of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, or transient ischemic attack in the 6 months prior to Screening.
- Male participant has a serum creatinine level greater than or equal to 1.5 mg per dL or female subject has a serum creatinine level greater than or equal to 1.4 mg per dL.
- Has a triglyceride level greater than 500 mg per dL.
- Male participant has a hemoglobin level less than 10.5 g per dL or female subject has a hemoglobin level less than 10.0 g per dL.
- Alanine aminotransferase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice.
- History of drug abuse (defined as any illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day) within 2 years prior to Screening.
- Has been discontinued from a thiazolidinedione or metformin therapy due to lack of efficacy or clinical or laboratory signs of intolerance.
- Previous history of cancer, other than basal cell or stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma, that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study medication.
- History of acute or chronic metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis with or without coma.
- Any disease or condition at Screening or Randomization that would compromise safety, might affect life expectancy, or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the subject according to the protocol.
- Currently participating in another investigational study or has participated in an investigational study within 30 days prior to randomization.
- Is required to take or continues taking any disallowed medication, prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may interfere with evaluation of the study medication, including:
- Antidiabetic medications other than study medication
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (77)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Haleyville, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Montgomery, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Pell City, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Anaheim, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Artesia, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Dinuba, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Norwalk, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Ana, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Monica, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Pueblo, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Altamonte Springs, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Panama City, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Plantation, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Cloud, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Boise, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Flossmoor, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Peoria, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Elkhart, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Shawnee, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Billings, Montana, United States
Unknown Facility
Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Fayetteville, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Perrysburg, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Zanesville, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Cranston, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Varnville, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Fayetteville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Corpus Christi, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
El Paso, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
McAllen, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Mission, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
New Braunfels, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
North Richland Hills, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bountiful, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Petersburg, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Port Orchard, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Providencia-Santiago, Chile
Unknown Facility
Temuco, Chile
Unknown Facility
Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Aibonito, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Caguas, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Ciales, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Coto Laurel, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Guayma, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Guaynabo, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico
Related Publications (2)
Perez A, Zhao Z, Jacks R, Spanheimer R. Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone/metformin fixed-dose combination therapy compared with pioglitazone and metformin monotherapy in treating patients with T2DM. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Dec;25(12):2915-23. doi: 10.1185/03007990903350011.
PMID: 19827910BACKGROUNDPerez A, Jacks R, Arora V, Spanheimer R. Effects of pioglitazone and metformin fixed-dose combination therapy on cardiovascular risk markers of inflammation and lipid profile compared with pioglitazone and metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010 Dec;12(12):973-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00389.x. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
PMID: 21122063RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. VP Clinical Science
- Organization
- Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
VP Clinical Science Strategy
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2008
First Posted
August 4, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 29, 2011
Results First Posted
March 9, 2010
Record last verified: 2011-07