Viability and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
The Importance of Viability for Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
100
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
30% of heart failure patients that receive a device for cardiac resynchronization therapy fail to show clinical improvement. The reason for lack of response is still unclear but factors such as scar tissue in the heart musculature, inadequate lead placement, device-settings and the degree of dyssynchrony before implant seems to be important. In this study, these factors are further investigated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Aug 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedOctober 6, 2011
October 1, 2011
3.3 years
August 7, 2009
October 4, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Responders:Echocardiographic:>/= 10% increase in Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or >/= 15 % reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV)
4 and 8 months, ( follow up- 2 years)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
LVESV, LVEDV, Cardiac output (CO), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) ProBNP Others: t-wave modulation all-cause mortality, cardiac death, hospitalization
4 and 8 months (follow-up after 2 years)
Clinical: >/= 25% increase in 6-min walk test or >/= 1 reduction in NYHA-class
4 and 8 months (follow-up 2 years)
Study Arms (2)
CRT group 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORCRT group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Patients are AV-optimized the first 4 months,then AV- and VV-optimized the next 4 months.
Patients are AV- and VV-optimized the first 4 months,then AV-optimized the next 4 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- LVEF\</= 35%, QRS-duration\>/= 120 ms, NYHA-class II- IV.
- Ischemic heart disease (\> 50% stenosis in 1 or more major epicardial coronary artery or prior PCI or CABG.)
- Optimal treatment ( beta-blocker, ACE-1 or ARB and spironolactone)
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Unstable angina pectoris
- Chronical atrial fibrillation
- Severe valvular disease
- Dementia or mental retardation
- Severe claustrophobia
- Acute myocardial infarction \< 3 months
- Severe health condition threatening short-term survival
- Severe kidney insufficiency, GFR \< 35 ml/min/1.73 m2
- Metal implants contraindicative of magnetic resonance scan
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagenlead
- Lund University Hospitalcollaborator
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarkcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Gentofte University Hospital
Hellerup, 2900, Denmark
University Hospital Lund
Lund, Lund, 221 85, Sweden
Related Publications (4)
Bax JJ, Abraham T, Barold SS, Breithardt OA, Fung JW, Garrigue S, Gorcsan J 3rd, Hayes DL, Kass DA, Knuuti J, Leclercq C, Linde C, Mark DB, Monaghan MJ, Nihoyannopoulos P, Schalij MJ, Stellbrink C, Yu CM. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Part 1--issues before device implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2153-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.019.
PMID: 16360042BACKGROUNDSogaard P, Egeblad H, Pedersen AK, Kim WY, Kristensen BO, Hansen PS, Mortensen PT. Sequential versus simultaneous biventricular resynchronization for severe heart failure: evaluation by tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation. 2002 Oct 15;106(16):2078-84. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000034512.90874.8e.
PMID: 12379577BACKGROUNDBleeker GB, Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ, Boersma E, Steendijk P, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006 Feb 21;113(7):969-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.543678. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
PMID: 16476852BACKGROUNDCleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L; Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 14;352(15):1539-49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050496. Epub 2005 Mar 7.
PMID: 15753115BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Niels Risum, M.D.
University Hospital Gentofte, Department of cardiology
- STUDY CHAIR
Thomas Fritz Hansen, M.D.
University Hospital Gentofte, department of cardiology
- STUDY CHAIR
Peter Søgaard, M.D., DMSc.
Gentofte University Hospital, department of cardiology
- STUDY CHAIR
Rasmus Borgquist, MD, PhD
University Hospital Lund
- STUDY CHAIR
Niels E Bruun, MD, DMSc
Gentofte University Hospital, department of cardiology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2009
First Posted
August 10, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 6, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-10