Increasing Family Planning Uptake Among Postpartum Women
1 other identifier
interventional
14,050
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The rationale for the study stems from the goal of reducing the very high unmet need for family planning among women in their first year postpartum. It is understood that the reason this need is so high in general is because postpartum women do not always "demand" family planning services, and family planning providers do not always "supply" services to postpartum (amenorrheic) women who do "demand" them. To address these supply and demand problems, corresponding supply and demand solutions will be tested.
- 1.Demand Generating Strategy-Integrate into Immunization Services Following birth, return to fertility among postpartum women is dependent on many factors. These include time since last birth, breastfeeding intensity, and menstrual status. However, when and how fertility returns is often misunderstood by women. For instance, many women think that they can not get pregnant before their menses return, or that as long as they are breastfeeding they are protected from pregnancy. Educating women about their return to fertility following giving birth, and reminding women about the importance of birth spacing for their health and the health of their children is the focus of the demand-generating strategy.
- 2.Supply Solution-Diversify Tools Available to Rule-Out Pregnancy The supply strategy focuses on giving providers the tools to give contraceptive methods to women who are amenorrheic. As recommended by the WHO, it is standard practice for FP providers to rule out the possibility of pregnancy before providing many types of methods to their clients. The presence of menses is often used to make this determination. However, return of menses can be delayed for many months in the postpartum period, limiting a provider's ability to supply postpartum women with contraceptive methods. To overcome this challenge, the Pregnancy Checklist was developed. It is a job-aid designed to rule out pregnancy based on client responses to questions concerning her recent sexual and reproductive history. Urine pregnancy testing is another viable option for ruling out pregnancy in non-menstruating FP clients, especially in situations where providers feel they cannot trust women to answer questions honestly. Thus, family planning clinics will be provided with free pregnancy test strips, and the change in same day uptake of FP methods will be measured.
- 3.Providing family planning messages to women attending immunization clinics with their child will cause them to seek family planning services in a greater proportion at 9-12 postpartum.
- 4.The availability of free pregnancy testing will increase same day method provision for new and restarting family planning clients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedApril 13, 2025
April 1, 2025
6 months
July 28, 2009
April 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The difference in current use of a modern family method among women attending immunization clinics for a child 9 to 12 months old between arms 2 and 3 of the study.
13 months
The difference in immediate uptake of a modern family planning method (excluding condoms) among new and re-starting family planning clients between arms 1 and 3 of the study.
6 months
Study Arms (3)
Supply
EXPERIMENTALIn each country, this arm will be comprised of women attending family planning clinics within the 5 facilities randomized to this group.
Demand
EXPERIMENTALIn each country, this arm will be comprised of women attending immunization clinics within the 5 facilities randomized to this group.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONIn each country, this arm will be comprised of women attending family planning and immunization clinics in 5 facilities randomized to this group.
Interventions
A new job-aid will be given to immunization providers that will guide them in assessing a mother's risk for pregnancy (based on LAM criteria), and guide them in making family planning referrals, including when a woman should start to use a family planning method if she wants to prevent pregnancy. The providers in immunization clinics will be asked to make such an assessment each time a woman has her baby vaccinated. Additionally, in family planning clinics located in the same facilities as the immunization clinics, family planning providers will be trained to use and provided with the pregnancy checklist (see "links" for more information on the checklist)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- New and restarting family planning client (women seeking family planning service)
- Women with children 9-12 months of age attending immunization services
You may not qualify if:
- Attending immunization services with a child other than one's own
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- FHI 360lead
- Ghana Health Servicescollaborator
- Ministry of Health, Zambiacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Central Region, GHANA
Cape Coast, Central Region, Ghana
Central Province, ZAMBIA
Kabwe;Chibombo, Central Province, Zambia
Related Publications (2)
Stanback J, Qureshi Z, Sekadde-Kigondu C, Gonzalez B, Nutley T. Checklist for ruling out pregnancy among family-planning clients in primary care. Lancet. 1999 Aug 14;354(9178):566. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01578-0.
PMID: 10470704BACKGROUNDVance G, Janowitz B, Chen M, Boyer B, Kasonde P, Asare G, Kafulubiti B, Stanback J. Integrating family planning messages into immunization services: a cluster-randomized trial in Ghana and Zambia. Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):359-66. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt022. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
PMID: 23570834DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2009
First Posted
July 30, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04