Anesthesia for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation
2 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, comparative, randomized, monocentric, clinical open study, to compare two anesthesia techniques (translaryngeal injection vs. spray as you go) in patients with cervical instability with regard to technical modalities and quality of fiberoptic awake intubation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedApril 20, 2015
April 1, 2015
5 years
July 27, 2009
April 17, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
patients satisfaction with anesthesia
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
up to two weeks after hospital admission
Secondary Outcomes (1)
pain after anesthesia
Change from Baseline in pain after anesthesia at end of hospital stay
Study Arms (2)
translaryngeal injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORtranslaryngeal injection of local anesthetics before the awake intubation
spray as you go
ACTIVE COMPARATORlocal anesthetics are given through the fiberoptic during awake intubation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with cervical instability undergoing elective decompression of cervical spine
You may not qualify if:
- patient refused participation
- contraindications for awake intubation techniques (e.g. nasal bleeding, anatomical disorders)
- patient under alcohol or drugs
- emergency surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Klinikum St. Georg gGmbH
Leipzig, Saxony, 04129, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Malcharek MJ, Bartz M, Rogos B, Gunther L, Sablotzki A, Gille J, Schneider G. Comparison of Enk Fibreoptic Atomizer with translaryngeal injection for topical anaesthesia for awake fibreoptic intubation in patients at risk of secondary cervical injury: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Sep;32(9):615-23. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000285.
PMID: 26086284DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Armin R Sablotzki, MD
Clinics of Anesthesiology, Critical care and Pain Therapy
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Malcharek, MD
Clinic of Anesthesiology, Dept. Neuroanesthesia and Neuromonitoring
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. med.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2009
First Posted
July 29, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 20, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04