A Trial of Degarelix in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
DELUTS
A Dose-Finding, Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Degarelix in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
3 other identifiers
interventional
404
6 countries
47
Brief Summary
A dose-finding, multi-centre, double-blind, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled trial to investigate efficacy and safety of degarelix in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2009
47 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 14, 2015
CompletedJune 8, 2015
May 1, 2015
1.6 years
July 27, 2009
April 22, 2014
May 13, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
This outcome measure was used to assess the dose-response of the 3 degarelix dose groups in terms of severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and progress of the disease process, versus the placebo group. One treatment month equals 28 days. The IPSS questionnaire is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of LUTS, and to monitor the progress of the symptoms during treatment. It contains 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5 (i.e. minimum total score is 0 and the maximum score is 35), where "0" corresponds to a response of "not at all" for the first six symptoms and "none" for nocturia, and "5" corresponds to a response of "almost always" for the first six symptoms and "5 times or more" for nocturia. The IPSS also includes a question to evaluate a patient's quality of life in relation to his urinary symptoms, which is not included in the total IPSS score.
From Baseline to Month 3 after Dosing
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Mean Change in IPSS
From Baseline to Month 4, Month 5 and Month 6 after Dosing
Odds Ratio (as Compared to Placebo) of Treatment Response in IPSS
At Month 3, Month 4, Month 5 and Month 6 after Dosing
Mean Percentage Change in Total Prostate Volume (TPV)
From Baseline to Month 3 and Month 6 after Dosing
Mean Change in Maximum Urinary Flow (Qmax)
From Baseline to Month 3 and Month 6 after Dosing
Study Arms (4)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORDegarelix 10 mg
EXPERIMENTALDegarelix 20 mg
EXPERIMENTALDegarelix 30 mg
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
10 mg degarelix, 40 mg/mL solution
20 mg degarelix, 40 mg/mL solution
30 mg degarelix, 40 mg/mL solution
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent obtained before any trial-related activity is performed
- Men, aged 50 or older
- Clinical signs and symptoms of BPH for ≥6 months
- Moderate to severe LUTS at screening, as defined by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥13
- An IPSS QoL score of ≥3 at screening
- Prostate specific antigen (PSA) at screening ≤10 ng/mL (responsibility of the Investigator to rule out prostate cancer when PSA is \>4 ng/mL, except in the USA where patients with a PSA \>4 and ≤10 ng/mL should undergo a prostatic biopsy or have a negative prostatic biopsy within 12 months prior to participation in the trial)
- Maximum urinary flow (Qmax) ranging between 5 to 15 mL/second with a minimum voided volume \>125 mL at screening
You may not qualify if:
- Post void residual volume (PVR) \>250 mL
- Stone in the bladder or urethra causing symptoms
- Acute or chronic prostatitis
- Interstitial cystitis / painful bladder syndrome
- Acute or recurrent urinary tract infections
- History of acute urinary retention (AUR)
- Lower urinary tract instrumentation (including prostate biopsy) within 30 days of dosing at Visit 2
- Clinical evidence of any of the following urinary tract conditions:
- Mullerian duct cysts
- Atonic, decompensated, or hypocontractile bladder
- Detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (contraction of the detrusor without sphincter relaxation)
- History of any of the following pelvic conditions:
- Pelvic surgery or any other pelvic procedure, including radical prostatectomy, pelvic surgery for removal of malignancy, or open lower colonic or rectal surgery
- Pelvic radiotherapy
- Any prior surgical procedure of the urinary tract, including minimally invasive LUTS/BPH therapies
- +17 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (47)
Urology Centers of Alabama, PC
Homewood, Alabama, United States
Coastal Clinical Research Inc
Mobile, Alabama, United States
California Professional Research
Newport Beach, California, United States
Genitourinary Surgical Consultants
Denver, Colorado, United States
Urology Associates , PC
Englewood, Colorado, United States
South Florida Medical Research
Aventura, Florida, United States
Winter Park Urology Associates
Orlando, Florida, United States
Pinellas Urology Inc
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Florida Urology Partners
Tampa, Florida, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian
New York, New York, United States
Hudson Valley Urology, PC
Poughkeepsie, New York, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Patient Priority Clinical Sites, LLC
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Carolina Urologic Research Center
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States
Middelheim Antwerp
Antwerp, Belgium
UZ Brussel
Brussels, Belgium
Can-Med Clinical Research Inc
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Dr Steinhoff Clinical Research
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Male/Female Health and Research Centre
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Bramalea Medical Centre
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Brandford Urology Research
Brantford, Ontario, Canada
Guelp Urology
Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Centre for Applied Urological Research
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Investigational Site
North Bay, Ontario, Canada
Female/Male Health Centres
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
Mahoney Medicine Professional Corporation
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Todd Webster Ontario Inc
Owen Sound, Ontario, Canada
Anthony Skehan Medicine Professional Corporation
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
The Male Health Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Ultra-Med Inc
Point-Claire, Quebec, Canada
Urologie, Male namesti 1783
Benešov, Czechia
Urocentrum Brno, Purkynova 35e
Brno, Czechia
Prvni privatni chirurgicke centrum SANUS, Labská kotlina I/1220
Hradec Králové, Czechia
Urologicka ambulance, Litomerice (Halek)
Litoměřice, Czechia
Slezska nemocnice, prospevkova organizace, Urologicke oddeleni
Opava, Czechia
Androgeos - soukrome urologicke a andrologicke cen, Na valech 4/289
Prague, Czechia
Urocentrum, Karlovo namesti 3
Prague, Czechia
Urologica ambulance, Praha 10
Prague, Czechia
Ústecké urocentrum, Ústi nad Labem (Liehne)
Ústi Nad Labem, Czechia
Urologia, A.O. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino
Avellino, Italy
Unità Operativa di Urologia, Azienda Opsedaliera Luigi Sacco
Milan, Italy
Unità Operativa di Urologia, Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, Italy
Akademia Medyczna w Gdansku
Gdansk, Poland
Publiczny Specjalistyczny ZOZ
Inowrocław, Poland
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr.1
Zabrze, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Following the planned 6-month interim analysis when all patients had completed the visit scheduled 6 months after dosing, a decision was taken to stop the trial since the primary efficacy endpoint was not met.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Development Support
- Organization
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Development Support
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2009
First Posted
July 28, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 8, 2015
Results First Posted
May 14, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05