The McKenzie Method Versus Manipulation for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
The Effect of the McKenzie Method as Compared With That of Manipulation When Applied Adjunctive to Information and Advice for Patients With Clinical Signs of Disc-related Chronic Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
350
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: The McKenzie method as well as spinal manipulation is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain throughout the western world. Recently, the need for studies testing the effect of treatment strategies to specific diagnostic subgroups of patients has been emphasized. The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of the McKenzie method and chiropractic manipulation, information, and advice for patients with clinical signs of persistent symptoms originating from a diskus in the low back. Methods: After clinical screening 350 patients with or without leg pain who presented with centralization of symptoms or signs of disc herniation were randomized to the McKenzie group or the manipulation group. The outcome measures, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, 11 point numerical pain scale, 6 point global perceived change scale, and quality of life (Short Form-36) were assessed at baseline, at end of treatment, and at 2 and 12 months follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Sep 2003
Longer than P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 19, 2009
CompletedNovember 19, 2009
November 1, 2009
5.2 years
July 13, 2009
August 13, 2009
November 9, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Disability
Problems performing daily activities measured on the 23-item modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (worst: 23 points, best:0 points).
two months after treatment
Number of Patients With Treatment Success
Treatment success was defined as a reduction of at least 5 points or an absolute score below 5 points on the 23-item modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (best value: 0 points, worst value 23 points)
Two months posttreatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain
twelve months posttreatment
Number of Patients on Sick Leave
twelve months posttreatment
Quality of Life
twelve months posttreatment
Cost Effectiveness
twelve months posttreatment
Study Arms (2)
McKenzie exercises
EXPERIMENTALMcKenzie exercises according to the principles of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy
Spinal manipulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORSpinal manipulation in combination with information of clinical findings and advice about back care
Interventions
Spinal manipulation to the lumbopelvic spine in combination with information about examination findings and advice about back care
McKenzie exercises according to the principles of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 60 years of age
- suffering from low back pain (LBP) with or without leg pain for a period of more than 6 weeks
- able to speak and understand the Danish language
- with a presentation of clinical signs of disc-related symptoms.
You may not qualify if:
- positive non-organic signs
- serious pathology suspected based on physical examination and/or magnetic resonance imaging
- application for disability pension or pending litigation
- pregnancy
- comorbidity
- recent back surgery
- problems with communication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Back and Rehabilitation Center Copengagen
Copenhagen, Copenhagen OE, 2100, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Petersen T, Christensen R, Juhl C. Predicting a clinically important outcome in patients with low back pain following McKenzie therapy or spinal manipulation: a stratified analysis in a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Apr 1;16:74. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0526-1.
PMID: 25887046DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Tom Petersen
- Organization
- Back and Rehabilitation Center Copenhagen
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tom Petersen, PT,PhD
Back and Rehabilitation Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2009
First Posted
July 14, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2003
Primary Completion
November 1, 2008
Study Completion
November 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 19, 2009
Results First Posted
November 19, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-11