Botulinum Toxin Versus Active Strength Training in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis
BooST
2 other identifiers
interventional
103
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy, feasibility and cost effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A injections to active nine weeks strength training and stretching program in the treatment of the chronic lateral epicondylitis. The main hypothesis is that the botulinum toxin type A injections may enable more rapid pain relief while strength training may provide better functional results and less relapses during the follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 31, 2014
December 1, 2014
5.8 years
June 29, 2009
December 30, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain, 100 mm visual analogue scale, change from baseline
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Grip strength (pain free and maximal), hydraulic hand dynamometer, change from baseline
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Experienced disability, 100 mm visual analogue scale, change from baseline
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Isometric wrist extension and flexion strength, digital hanging scale with rigid bench frame, change from baseline
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Treatment adverse effects
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Economic evaluation of interventions, direct and indirect costs
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
Days in sick leave
0, 6, 13, 26, 39, 52 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active strength training and stretching
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive strength training and stretching
Botulinum toxin type A injections
ACTIVE COMPARATORBotulinum toxin type A injections
Interventions
Two injections of 10-60 units of botulinum toxin type A. Injections are administered with ENMG assisted technique at the baseline and after 13 weeks.
Training duration 9 weeks, intensified every 3 weeks in supervision of physiotherapist. Training program includes progressive, slow, repetitive wrist and forearm stretching, eccentric muscle strengthening, occupational exercises and upper limb neural mobilization training.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pain at the lateral side of the elbow over 3 months
- local tenderness on palpation over the lateral epicondyle
- positive Mill's sign
- lateral elbow pain progression on resisted wrist and/or middle finger extension
- involved in working life
You may not qualify if:
- bilateral symptoms or simultaneous medial epicondylitis
- verified or suspected cervical radiculopathy or affected limb neuropathy
- congenital or acquired deformities of the elbow
- previous surgery of the elbow
- infection, dislocation, tendon ruptures, or fractures in the area
- systemic musculoskeletal or neurological disorders, incl. rheumatic diseases and fibromyalgia
- allergy, antibodies or other contraindications for botulinum toxin
- severe depression, chronic pain syndrome or somatisation disorder
- ongoing retirement process
- pregnancy or breastfeeding
- current participation in other clinical trials
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Physical medicine and Rehabilitation, Seinäjoki Central Hospital
Seinäjoki, 60220, Finland
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aki Vainionpää, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Seinäjoki Central Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Specialist in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2009
First Posted
June 30, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 31, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12