Comparison of Mulligan Technique and Muscle Energy Technique in Lateral Epicondylitis
Comparison of the Effect of Mulligan and Muscle Energy Techniques on Pain, Grip Strength and Functionality in Individuals With Lateral Epicondylitis
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the effects of mulligan and muscle energy techniques on pain, grip strength and functionality will be investigated in a randomized controlled manner in individuals with lateral epicondylitis. Various treatments have been tried in patients with lateral epicondylitis whose daily activities are restricted in order to reduce pain and increase functions. Among them, conservative and physical therapy agents have an important place. There are many studies in the literature evaluating the effects of mobilization in LE treatment. However, there are no definitive data on the long-term efficacy and benefits of all these treatment methods. Mulligan and muscle energy techniques can be used in lateral epicondylitis due to many positive reasons such as being effective in a short time, giving fast results, high success rate, risk-free and painless in the case of specialists. Thanks to the findings obtained from our study, it is aimed to contribute to the literature with objective, evidence-based results in this field.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 7, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 14, 2020
CompletedSeptember 8, 2021
August 1, 2020
3 months
July 23, 2020
September 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline in Hand Grip Strenght at 6 weeks
The maximum grip force measurements of the patients were made with "Baseline Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer". The patient's measurements were carried out in two positions. While the patient was in a sitting position, measurements were made in shoulder adduction, elbow 90˚ flexion, forearm in neutral position, wrist in 0-30˚ extension and 0-15˚ in ulnar deviation position. While the patient was standing, measurement was performed with shoulder adduction, elbow extension, forearm in neutral position. For maximum grip, patients should be able to hold the dynamometer for a maximum of 3 seconds. it was said to tighten with all its might. Measurements were repeated 3 times at 30-second intervals on the affected limb, and the measurements were averaged. Values are noted in kilograms (kg) - force
Baseline and 4 weeks
Change from baseline in Pain Score at 6 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale was used to determine the severity of rest, activity and night pain in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a 10 cm scale before starting treatment and after 4 weeks of treatment. The value "0" means that there is no pain, and the value "10" means unbearable pain. The marked points are measured and recorded in centimeters
Baseline and 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in Functionality at 6 weeks
Baseline and 4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Mulligan Technique
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to the exercises applied to the participants in the control group, the participants in this group used Mobilization with movement, which was performed with the principle of painless movement 3 times a week for a total of 12 times a week for 4 weeks. Mobilization with movement has been performed by a certified physiotherapist who has been practicing this technique for 10 years.
Muscle Energy Technique
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to the exercises applied to the participants in the control group, the Janda method (Post Isometric Relaxation Technique) from Muscle Energy Technique (3 times a week) was used 3 times a week for 4 weeks.
Only Exercise (Control)
ACTIVE COMPARATORStretching and strengthening exercises for the forearm extensors were shown to the participants in the control group for 4 weeks every day of the week.
Interventions
First, the painless application angle was determined for each patient. The lateral condyle of the humerus was fixed by the web range of the physiotherapist. The elbow joint was glided until the elbow joint and the hand tightening position were not able to cause pain. The patients were asked to repeat the motion of the elbow joint and the ball squeezing motion given to their hands 10 times without pain. For pain control, the same procedure was performed with three sets, each containing 10 repetitions of the exercise. The interval between sets was 15 to 20 seconds, and the interval between repetitions within each set was 30 seconds.
Firstly, 5-7 sec opposite isometric muscle contraction was requested from the patient in the barrier by passively stretching by the physiotherapist until the barrier of the related muscle or dysfunctional joint. After a short rest period of 2-3 seconds, the physiotherapist continued to stretch passively until the second barrier. The application continued until the tension of the muscle or dysfunction of the joint disappeared.
Eccentric training for the extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis (ECRB) muscle, the most affected wrist extensor tendon, and static stretching exercise for the EKRB muscle were given as home exercise program. The best stretching position for the EKRB tendon is provided when the elbow joint is in extension, forearm pronation, when the wrist is flexed with ulnar deviation (Mills maneuver). Each exercise was taught to patients in 10 repetitions and 10 seconds, and one day of the week, participants in the control group performed their exercises under the supervision of a physiotherapist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosing lateral epicondylitis
- Age between 30 and 60 years
- Willingness to comply with treatment and follow-up assessments
You may not qualify if:
- Treatment of elbow complaints with surgical intervention
- Physiotherapy or CSIs in the past 6 months
- Duration of \<3 months
- Severe neck or shoulder problems likely to cause or maintain the elbow complaints
- Posterior interosseous nerve compression
- Congenital or acquired deformities of the elbow
- Systemic musculoskeletal or neurologic disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
KTO Karatay University
Konya, 42020, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bayram Sönmez ÜNÜVAR
KTO Karatay University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2020
First Posted
August 10, 2020
Study Start
August 14, 2020
Primary Completion
November 7, 2020
Study Completion
November 14, 2020
Last Updated
September 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-08