Experimental Control Investigation of the Impact of Assistive Technology on the User-caregiver Dyad: a Multi-site Trial
ATUTI
2 other identifiers
interventional
88
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an assistive technology updating and tune up intervention on users and their caregivers. This intervention includes 4 components:
- an in-residence assessment of the mobility preferences of the older person and his/her caregiver
- a detailed review of forms of assistance, technological and human, that are currently being used
- recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the older person's mobility assistive technology or assistance strategy
- therapist negotiation of an mobility assistive technology updating and tune-up intervention plan with the individual and his or her caregiver. The intervention is provided to the immediate treatment following the administration of baseline measures and the delayed intervention group six weeks later, after an additional baseline measurement. The treatment is six weeks long and the follow-up is 26 weeks. Hypothesis 1: For community-dwelling older people, an intervention that increases the appropriateness of existing or new assistive technology(AT) for mobility or self-care will alter established patterns of human assistance, such that caregiver burden is reduced or eliminated. Hypothesis 2: At the same time, AT users will report less difficulty in mobility or self-care, as well as enhanced subjective well-being, and satisfaction with their modified personal assistance strategy. Hypothesis 3: Following the AT intervention, caregivers will report reduced physical and/or psychological demands and increased satisfaction with their caregiving-related activities compared with
- the pre-intervention period
- caregivers in a delayed intervention control group. Hypothesis 4: Decreased physical and/or psychological demands on helpers will be associated with increases in device users' satisfaction with their personal assistance strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jun 2009
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2011
CompletedFebruary 19, 2014
February 1, 2014
2.2 years
June 24, 2009
February 14, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of Life Habits
baseline (1or 2 times), 6 weeks (immediately after intervention), 16 weeks later
Caregivers: Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure
base line (1 or 2), 6 weeks (immediately after intervention), 16 weeks later
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Individually Prioritized Problem Assessment
Baseline (1 or 2 times), Immediately after intervention, 16 weeks later
Functional Autonomy Measurement System
Baseline (1 or 2 times), Immediately after intervention, 16 weeks later
Psychological Impact of Assistive Devices Scale
Imediately after intervention. 16 weeks later
Satisfaction with Personal Assistance Strategy
Baseline (1 or 2 times), Immediately after intervention, 16 weeks later
Study Arms (2)
Immediate intervention
EXPERIMENTALSubjects and their caregivers randomized to this arm receive the intervention immediately after baseline data is collected.
Delayed Intervention
EXPERIMENTALSubjects and their caregivers who are randomized to this group will receive the intervention after baseline measurements are administered twice (6 weeks apart).
Interventions
This intervention includes 4 components: 1) an in-residence assessment of the mobility preferences of the older person and his/her caregiver; 2) a detailed review of forms of assistance, technological and human, that are currently being used; 3) recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the older person's mobility assistive technology or assistance strategy; and 4) therapist negotiation of an mobility assistive technology updating and tune-up intervention plan with the individual and his or her caregiver.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Users: Aged 65 years and over
- Have moderate to severe disability that limits their ability to move from place to place independently and/or to perform self-care activities.
- Living at home
- Receiving 2 or more hour per week of assistance with mobility and/or self-care activities from a non-professional, caregiver who is also willing to take part in the study.
- Those caregivers will be adults aged 18 years and over.
You may not qualify if:
- Assistive technology users will be excluded if they have severe aphasia, are currently on a community occupational therapist caseload, or are unable to communicate in English or French.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Simon Fraser University
Vancovuer, British Columbia, V6B 5K3, Canada
Centre de santé et des services sociaux de Bordeaux-Cartierville--St-Laurent
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
the Centre de santé et des services sociaux Cavendish
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
the Centre de santé et des services sociaux de Laval
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Louise Demers, PhD
Université de Montréal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Département de l'ergothérapie
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2009
First Posted
June 25, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
August 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 19, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02