A Study Evaluating the Efficacy of SAR 1118 (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye Conducted in a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked and Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Three Different Concentrations (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) of SAR 1118 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye Using the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) Model
1 other identifier
interventional
230
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of three different concentrations (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) of SAR 1118 Ophthalmic Solution compared to placebo in the treatment of dry eye.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 3, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 18, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 18, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 6, 2017
CompletedAugust 9, 2021
August 1, 2021
7 months
June 20, 2009
August 9, 2016
August 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score in Pre-Controlled Adverse Environment at Day 84
Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. The staining was graded with the Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc. (ORA) scale. The corneal surface is divided into three regions: superior, central and inferior. The scores for each of these 3 regions ranged from 0 to 4 (0=no staining; 1=occasional; 2=countable; 3=uncountable, but not confluent; 4=confluent) with 0.5 point increments, and lower score indicates a better outcome. Inferior corneal fluorescein staining scores from the study eye only were reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse (higher) score at baseline.
Day 84
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84
Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84
Study Arms (4)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo Ophthalmic Solution
0.1% Lifitegrast
EXPERIMENTALLifitegrast
1.0% Lifitegrast
EXPERIMENTALLifitegrast
5.0% Lifitegrast
EXPERIMENTALLifitegrast
Interventions
Ophthalmic Solution
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed Informed Consent Form and HIPAA document
- Willing and able to comply with all study procedures
- Be at least 18 years of age
- Patient-reported history of dry eye in both eyes
- Demonstrate a positive response when exposed to the Controlled Adverse Environment model
- A negative urine pregnancy test if female of childbearing potential and must use adequate birth control throughout the study period
You may not qualify if:
- Any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could affect study parameters including, but not limited to, active ocular infection, ocular inflammation, glaucoma, and/or diabetic retinopathy
- Unwilling to avoid wearing contact lenses for 7 days prior to and for duration of the study period
- Any blood donation or significant loss of blood within 56 days of Visit 1
- Any history of immunodeficiency disorder, positive HIV, hepatitis B, C, or evidence of acute active hepatitis A (anti-HAV IgM), or organ or bone marrow transplant.
- Use of any topical ophthalmic preparations (including tear substitutes) 72 hrs prior to screening assessments and through the entire study period
- Any significant illness that could interfere with study parameters
- History of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or similar type of corneal refractive surgery within 12 months prior to Visit 1, and/or any other ocular surgical procedure within 12 months prior to Visit 1; or any scheduled ocular surgical procedure during the study period.
- Known history of alcohol and/or drug abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shirelead
Study Sites (5)
The Eye Care Group
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States
Central Maine Eye Care
Lewiston, Maine, 04243, United States
Ora, Inc. (two locations)
Andover, Massachusetts, 01840, United States
Mundorf Eye Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
Total Eye Care, P.A.
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
Related Publications (1)
Semba CP, Torkildsen GL, Lonsdale JD, McLaurin EB, Geffin JA, Mundorf TK, Kennedy KS, Ousler GW. A phase 2 randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of a novel integrin antagonist (SAR 1118) for the treatment of dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;153(6):1050-60.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
PMID: 22330307DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Shire (Note: Lifitegrast was divested to Novartis in 2019)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2009
First Posted
June 23, 2009
Study Start
August 3, 2009
Primary Completion
February 18, 2010
Study Completion
February 18, 2010
Last Updated
August 9, 2021
Results First Posted
March 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2021-08