NCT00926185

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of three different concentrations (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) of SAR 1118 Ophthalmic Solution compared to placebo in the treatment of dry eye.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
230

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 20, 2009

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 23, 2009

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 3, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 18, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 18, 2010

Completed
7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 6, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 9, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

June 20, 2009

Results QC Date

August 9, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Dry Eyeophthalmic delivery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score in Pre-Controlled Adverse Environment at Day 84

    Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. The staining was graded with the Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc. (ORA) scale. The corneal surface is divided into three regions: superior, central and inferior. The scores for each of these 3 regions ranged from 0 to 4 (0=no staining; 1=occasional; 2=countable; 3=uncountable, but not confluent; 4=confluent) with 0.5 point increments, and lower score indicates a better outcome. Inferior corneal fluorescein staining scores from the study eye only were reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse (higher) score at baseline.

    Day 84

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84

    Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84

Study Arms (4)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo Ophthalmic Solution

Drug: Placebo

0.1% Lifitegrast

EXPERIMENTAL

Lifitegrast

Drug: Lifitegrast

1.0% Lifitegrast

EXPERIMENTAL

Lifitegrast

Drug: Lifitegrast

5.0% Lifitegrast

EXPERIMENTAL

Lifitegrast

Drug: Lifitegrast

Interventions

Ophthalmic Solution

Also known as: SAR 1118
0.1% Lifitegrast1.0% Lifitegrast5.0% Lifitegrast

Ophthalmic Solution

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed Informed Consent Form and HIPAA document
  • Willing and able to comply with all study procedures
  • Be at least 18 years of age
  • Patient-reported history of dry eye in both eyes
  • Demonstrate a positive response when exposed to the Controlled Adverse Environment model
  • A negative urine pregnancy test if female of childbearing potential and must use adequate birth control throughout the study period

You may not qualify if:

  • Any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could affect study parameters including, but not limited to, active ocular infection, ocular inflammation, glaucoma, and/or diabetic retinopathy
  • Unwilling to avoid wearing contact lenses for 7 days prior to and for duration of the study period
  • Any blood donation or significant loss of blood within 56 days of Visit 1
  • Any history of immunodeficiency disorder, positive HIV, hepatitis B, C, or evidence of acute active hepatitis A (anti-HAV IgM), or organ or bone marrow transplant.
  • Use of any topical ophthalmic preparations (including tear substitutes) 72 hrs prior to screening assessments and through the entire study period
  • Any significant illness that could interfere with study parameters
  • History of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or similar type of corneal refractive surgery within 12 months prior to Visit 1, and/or any other ocular surgical procedure within 12 months prior to Visit 1; or any scheduled ocular surgical procedure during the study period.
  • Known history of alcohol and/or drug abuse

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

The Eye Care Group

Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States

Location

Central Maine Eye Care

Lewiston, Maine, 04243, United States

Location

Ora, Inc. (two locations)

Andover, Massachusetts, 01840, United States

Location

Mundorf Eye Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States

Location

Total Eye Care, P.A.

Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Semba CP, Torkildsen GL, Lonsdale JD, McLaurin EB, Geffin JA, Mundorf TK, Kennedy KS, Ousler GW. A phase 2 randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of a novel integrin antagonist (SAR 1118) for the treatment of dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;153(6):1050-60.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Feb 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Interventions

lifitegrast

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Shire (Note: Lifitegrast was divested to Novartis in 2019)

Study Officials

  • Study Director

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2009

First Posted

June 23, 2009

Study Start

August 3, 2009

Primary Completion

February 18, 2010

Study Completion

February 18, 2010

Last Updated

August 9, 2021

Results First Posted

March 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2021-08

Locations