A Trial of Ligation Plus Nadolol Versus Nadolol Alone in the Prophylaxis of First Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ligation Plus Nadolol Versus Nadolol Alone in the Prophylaxis of First Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
1 other identifier
interventional
140
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The value of banding ligation plus beta blocker in the prophylaxis of first episodes of variceal bleeding has not yet been evaluated. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of banding ligation plus nadolol versus nadolol in the prophylaxis of first bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high-risk esophageal varices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2009
CompletedJune 16, 2009
June 1, 2009
4.4 years
June 3, 2009
June 15, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary end points of the study were the first episode of variceal bleeding.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary end points were adverse events related to treatment and death of any cause.
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Ligation+Nadolol
EXPERIMENTALMulti-ligators were applied. Patients received regular ligation treatment at an interval of 3-4 weeks until variceal obliteration. Intervention; ligation of varices plus beta blockers (Nadolol).
Nadolol only
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- the cause of portal hypertension was cirrhosis
- the degree of esophageal varices was F2 (moderate varices) or more, associated with any of red color signs (red wale markings, cherry red spots or hematocystic spots)
- no history of hemorrhage from esophageal varices
- no current treatment with beta-blockers
- cirrhosis was based on results of liver biopsy, or clinical and biochemical examinations and image studies
You may not qualify if:
- age greater than 75 years old or younger than 20 years old
- association with malignancy, uremia or other serious medical illness which may reduce the life expectancy
- presence of refractory ascites, hepatic encephalopathy or marked jaundice (serum bilirubin \> 10 mg/dl)
- history of shunt operation, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt or endoscopic therapy (EIS or EVL)
- had contraindications to beta-blockers, such as asthma, heart failure, complete atrioventricular block, hypotension ( systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg), pulse rate \< 60/ min
- unable to cooperate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2009
First Posted
June 16, 2009
Study Start
December 1, 2004
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
May 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 16, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-06