Ureteral Stent Size Measurement Study
Three Methods of Ureteral Stent Measurement: Which Method Improves Quality of Life After Ureteral Stenting?
1 other identifier
observational
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To examine a patient's quality of life using three methods for measuring stent size: (a) direct measurement, (b) patient height, and (c) a standardized formula. The intent of the study is to show if there is a difference in a patient's quality of life, postoperative symptoms, pain medication and anticholinergic use by using one of these specific methods for stent size determination. No method is interventional in this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Apr 2009
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedJuly 31, 2015
July 1, 2015
5.1 years
May 15, 2009
July 30, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine the difference in patient quality of life (QOL), post-op symptoms, and pain medication and anticholinergic use in patients who receive ureteral stents where size is determined by direct measurement, patient height,a standardized formula.
within 4 weeks post-porcedure
Study Arms (3)
1 Direct ureteric measurement
This is determined by using a 5 French Pollack Open-Ended Flexi-Tip Ureteral catheter (Cook, Spencer, Indiana) to cannulate the ureteral orifice. A retrograde pyelogram will be done at the conclusion of the procedure and the Pollack will be advanced to the pyeloureteral junction (PUJ) under fluoroscopy. At this point the length of the distance between the PUJ and vesicoureteral junction (VUJ) will be recorded and stent length determined based on this measurement.
2 Based on patient height
We will use the height measurement criteria used by Lee et al in their study. Patients less than 5'2" will receive a 22 cm stent, 5'3"-5'7" will get a 24 cm stent, 5'8"-5'10" will get a 26 cm stent, 5'11" to 6'1" will get a 28 cm stent, and all patients greater than 6'2" will receive a 30 cm stent.
3 Based on a predetermined formula
We will use the formula described by Wieder. Stent length in cm= patients height in inches - 42.
Eligibility Criteria
Community patients who present to Charleston area Medical Center (CAMC) or the private urology clinics of Drs. Davalos,Martinez,Tierney with the requirement of ureteral stent would be screened for possible enrillment in the study.
You may qualify if:
- All patients presenting to Charleston Area Medical Center between the ages of 18 and 90 years old who will undergo cytoscopy or ureteroscopy with ureteral stent placement will be eligible for the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients excluded from this study will be those who are less than 18 years of age, pregnant women, and patients who are septic on presentation, as well as patients who have had lower extremity amputations or are wheelchair bound.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Urology center of charleston
Charleston, West Virginia, 25301, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samuel Deem, M.D.
CAMC Medical Staff - with admitting privileges
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Samuel Deem, CAMC medical Staff - With Admitting Privileges.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2009
First Posted
June 12, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 31, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07