Feasibility Study to Determine the Effects of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Periodic Breathing
1 other identifier
interventional
50
3 countries
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this feasibility study is to determine the effect of stimulating the phrenic nerve to treat periodic breathing (a pattern of breathing characterized by hyperpneas followed by hypopneas or apneas). Clinically, these physiologic events translate into sleep fragmentation, excessive daytime sleepiness, reduced exercise capacity, and possibly ventricular arrhythmias. Stage 1 of the study is acute in nature, such that subjects will undergo the placement of a stimulation lead, followed by assessment of stimulation of the phrenic nerve using the lead for up to 2 nights of sleep. A sensing lead may also be placed during the initial implant procedure. Observational data will be obtained and stimulation provided using an externalized system connected to the study leads. Following the study, all investigational components will be removed from the patient. Stage 2 of the study is being conducted at one of the participating sites to determine the initial safety of chronic stimulation of the phrenic nerve in a limited number of patients with sleep disordered breathing. It is anticipated that data obtained in this feasibility study will show that the proposed intervention can modify respiration with a low incidence of adverse effects. The results of this trial are intended to be used to develop a subsequent protocol for a multi-center study of chronic phrenic nerve pacing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Oct 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_1
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 27, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedJanuary 6, 2014
January 1, 2014
2.9 years
May 21, 2009
January 2, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The primary goal of this feasibility study is to show an acute improvement in respiration.
Acute (up to 2 nights of sleep)
The primary safety endpoint of the study is the absence of adverse events related to stimulation that result in hospitalization, the prolongation of an existing hospitalization, or death of the patient.
Acute (up to 2 nights of sleep) plus post-operative assessment at one week (5-10 days) or until resolution of an observed adverse event.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Characterization of chronic safety of stimulating the phrenic nerve (Stage 2 of study).
2 years
Study Arms (1)
Phrenic Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
In Stage 1, a stimulation lead will be introduced via standard access methods and positioned to provide stimulation. A second lead may also be placed for sensing purposes. The proximal portions of the implanted lead(s) will remain externalized such that stimulation and observation can be made using external stimulation and recording equipment. Study subjects will be observed and stimulation will be performed for up to 2 nights of sleep in a clinically supported environment. In Stage 2, a stimulation device and lead will be permanently implanted.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is 18 years of age or older
- Patient has a demonstrated history of periodic breathing (symptoms may include sleep fragmentation, as reported by patient or as witnessed by another person, night arousal after apneic episodes, reduced exercise capacity, and daytime sleepiness)
- Patient is expected to be able to tolerate the procedure and remain clinically stable for the duration of the study (e.g. the subject is able to lie down long enough to insert the lead(s) without shortness of breath and the subject is able to tolerate instrumentation during study).
- Patient or their legal representative is willing and able to sign an IRB/MEC approved informed consent (and a privacy protection authorization in the United States)
You may not qualify if:
- Baseline oxygen saturation less than or equal to 90% on a stable FIO2
- Evidence of phrenic nerve palsy
- Temperature \> 38.0 degrees Celsius
- Inability to place catheter (e.g. previously known coagulopathy, distorted anatomy, etc.)
- Patient is currently enrolled in another study that may confound the results of this study
- Patient for whom informed consent cannot be obtained
- Patient who is pregnant or of child bearing potential without a negative pregnancy test within 10 days of the study procedure
- Patients implanted with a pacemaker, implantable defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization device who are unable to tolerate turning off the device for the duration of the system testing procedure (based on medical judgment)
- Patients with severe COPD (per GOLD scale)
- Patients with a history of myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to the study
- Patients with unstable angina
- Patients who are intolerant of or allergic to contrast dye
- Patients who are contraindicated for \<1mg of steroid (on the stimulation lead).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Ohio Heart Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Jiangsu Province Hospital
Nanjing, China
Polish Military Hospital
Wroclaw, Poland
Related Publications (2)
Zhang XL, Ding N, Wang H, Augostini R, Yang B, Xu D, Ju W, Hou X, Li X, Ni B, Cao K, George I, Wang J, Zhang SJ. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration and congestive heart failure: a safety and proof-of-concept study. Chest. 2012 Oct;142(4):927-934. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1899.
PMID: 22302299DERIVEDPonikowski P, Javaheri S, Michalkiewicz D, Bart BA, Czarnecka D, Jastrzebski M, Kusiak A, Augostini R, Jagielski D, Witkowski T, Khayat RN, Oldenburg O, Gutleben KJ, Bitter T, Karim R, Iber C, Hasan A, Hibler K, Germany R, Abraham WT. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnoea in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2012 Apr;33(7):889-94. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr298. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
PMID: 21856678DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2009
First Posted
May 27, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 6, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-01