NCT00907296

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effect of romosozumab compared with placebo on time to radiographic healing of fresh tibial diaphyseal fractures (fractures in the midsection of the shinbone).

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Strong global presence with extensive site network
Enrollment
402

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
23 countries

103 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 22, 2009

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 2, 2009

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 6, 2012

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 10, 2013

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 22, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

May 21, 2009

Results QC Date

April 10, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 9, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Fracture HealingTibial Diaphyseal Fracture

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Radiographic Healing

    Time to radiographic healing was defined as the time from intramedullary (IM) nailing to the first occurrence of bridging of 3 out of 4 cortices. Radiographic fracture healing was determined by a panel of independent reviewers (orthopedic/trauma surgeons and radiologists) blinded to treatment. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) method was used to estimate the median time to radiographic healing and the confidence intervals. Unplanned revision surgery to promote healing was considered a competing risk in CIF estimate.

    52 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change From Week 8 in Short Form (36) Health Survey Physical Functioning Domain

    Week 8 and weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, and 52

  • Number of Participants With Unplanned Revision Surgeries

    52 weeks

  • Time to Clinical Healing

    52 weeks

Study Arms (10)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants received subcutaneous injections of matching placebo on day 1 and at weeks 2, 6, and 12.

Drug: Placebo

Romosozumab 70 mg: 2 Doses

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received subcutaneous injections of 70 mg romosozumab on day 1 and week 2, and matching placebo at weeks 6 and 12.

Biological: Romosozumab

Romosozumab 70 mg: 3 Doses

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received subcutaneous injections of 70 mg romosozumab on day 1 and weeks 2 and 6, and matching placebo at week 12.

Biological: Romosozumab

Romosozumab 70 mg: 4 Doses

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received subcutaneous injections of 70 mg romosozumab on day 1 and weeks 2, 6, and 12.

Biological: Romosozumab

Romosozumab 140 mg: 2 Doses

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received subcutaneous injections of 140 mg romosozumab on day 1 and week 2, and matching placebo at weeks 6 and 12.

Biological: Romosozumab

Romosozumab 140 mg: 3 Doses

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received subcutaneous injections of 140 mg romosozumab on day 1 and weeks 2 and 6, and matching placebo at week 12.

Biological: Romosozumab

Romosozumab 140 mg: 4 Doses

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received subcutaneous injections of 140 mg romosozumab on day 1 and weeks 2, 6, and 12.

Biological: Romosozumab

Romosozumab 210 mg: 2 Doses

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received subcutaneous injections of 210 mg romosozumab on day 1 and week 2, and matching placebo at weeks 6 and 12.

Biological: Romosozumab

Romosozumab 210 mg: 3 Doses

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received subcutaneous injections of 210 mg romosozumab on day 1 and weeks 2 and 6, and matching placebo at week 12.

Biological: Romosozumab

Romosozumab 210 mg: 4 Doses

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received subcutaneous injections of 210 mg romosozumab on day 1 and weeks 2, 6, and 12.

Biological: Romosozumab

Interventions

RomosozumabBIOLOGICAL

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Also known as: AMG 785, Evenity
Romosozumab 140 mg: 2 DosesRomosozumab 140 mg: 3 DosesRomosozumab 140 mg: 4 DosesRomosozumab 210 mg: 2 DosesRomosozumab 210 mg: 3 DosesRomosozumab 210 mg: 4 DosesRomosozumab 70 mg: 2 DosesRomosozumab 70 mg: 3 DosesRomosozumab 70 mg: 4 Doses

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Skeletally mature adults, age 18 to 85 years with radiographically closed growth plates
  • Fresh unilateral closed or Gustilo type I or type II open tibial fracture
  • Definitive fracture fixation with reamed (closed and open fractures) or unreamed (open fractures only) intramedullary nailing

You may not qualify if:

  • Major polytrauma or significant axial trauma
  • Associated lower extremity fracture that will delay subject's ability to bear weight beyond the normal time expected for a tibial shaft fracture
  • Use of bone grafts at the time of fracture fixation
  • Pathological fracture or metabolic or bone disease
  • History of symptomatic spinal stenosis or facial nerve paralysis
  • Malignancy within the last 5 years
  • Evidence of the following (currently or within the past 5 years): elevated transaminases, significantly impaired renal function, current hyper- or hypocalcaemia
  • Use of agents affecting bone metabolism
  • Subject refuses to use appropriate methods of contraception

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (103)

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

Research Site

Orange, California, 92868, United States

Location

Research Site

Aurora, Colorado, 80012, United States

Location

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States

Location

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, 32209, United States

Location

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Research Site

Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

Location

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Research Site

Brooklyn, New York, 11220, United States

Location

Research Site

Rochester, New York, 14642, United States

Location

Research Site

Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16602, United States

Location

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Research Site

Columbia, South Carolina, 29203, United States

Location

Research Site

Sandy City, Utah, 84070, United States

Location

Research Site

Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia

Location

Research Site

Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia

Location

Research Site

Blagoevgrad, 2700, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Pleven, 5800, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Plovdiv, 4002, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Rousse, 7000, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Sofia, 1527, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Red Deer, Alberta, T4N 6V7, Canada

Location

Research Site

Ajax, Ontario, L1S 2J5, Canada

Location

Research Site

Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 7C7, Canada

Location

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1R6, Canada

Location

Research Site

Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4, Canada

Location

Research Site

Windsor, Ontario, N9A 1E1, Canada

Location

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada

Location

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5, Canada

Location

Research Site

Ã…rhus C, 8000, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark

Location

Research Site

København NV, 2400, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Tallinn, 11312, Estonia

Location

Research Site

Tartu, 50410, Estonia

Location

Research Site

Lille, 59000, France

Location

Research Site

Marseille, 13009, France

Location

Research Site

Nantes, 44035, France

Location

Research Site

Paris, 75571, France

Location

Research Site

Aachen, 52074, Germany

Location

Research Site

Hamburg, 20246, Germany

Location

Research Site

Hanover, 30625, Germany

Location

Research Site

Mannheim, 68165, Germany

Location

Research Site

Münster, 48149, Germany

Location

Research Site

Athens, 12462, Greece

Location

Research Site

Athens, 14561, Greece

Location

Research Site

Larissa, 41110, Greece

Location

Research Site

Pátrai, 26500, Greece

Location

Research Site

Thessaloniki, 56429, Greece

Location

Research Site

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Research Site

New Territories, Hong Kong

Location

Research Site

Budapest, 1081, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Miskolc, 3526, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Nyíregyháza, 4400, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Szeged, 6725, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 034, India

Location

Research Site

Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 054, India

Location

Research Site

Mangalore, Karnataka, 575 002, India

Location

Research Site

Pune, Maharashtra, 411 005, India

Location

Research Site

Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302 022, India

Location

Research Site

Madurai, Tamil Nadu, 625 020, India

Location

Research Site

Gandhinagar, 382 428, India

Location

Research Site

Mangalore, 575 001, India

Location

Research Site

Nashik, 422 009, India

Location

Research Site

Florence, 50139, Italy

Location

Research Site

Milan, 20122, Italy

Location

Research Site

Milan, 20142, Italy

Location

Research Site

Pisa, 56126, Italy

Location

Research Site

Roma (RM), 00133, Italy

Location

Research Site

Verona, 37126, Italy

Location

Research Site

Liepāja, 3400, Latvia

Location

Research Site

Riga, 1004, Latvia

Location

Research Site

Riga, 1005, Latvia

Location

Research Site

Valmiera, 4201, Latvia

Location

Research Site

Kaunas, 44320, Lithuania

Location

Research Site

Vilnius, 04130, Lithuania

Location

Research Site

Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64040, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Christchurch, 8022, New Zealand

Location

Research Site

Tauranga, 3143, New Zealand

Location

Research Site

Kongsvinger, 2226, Norway

Location

Research Site

Bialystok, 15-276, Poland

Location

Research Site

Bytom, 41-902, Poland

Location

Research Site

Kraków, 31-826, Poland

Location

Research Site

Krakow, 30-901, Poland

Location

Research Site

Lublin, 20-718, Poland

Location

Research Site

Bucharest, 014461, Romania

Location

Research Site

Bucharest, 050098, Romania

Location

Research Site

Timișoara, 300736, Romania

Location

Research Site

Moscow, 115280, Russia

Location

Research Site

Moscow, 117292, Russia

Location

Research Site

Moscow, 119049, Russia

Location

Research Site

Moscow, 127299, Russia

Location

Research Site

Moscow, 129327, Russia

Location

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, 196247, Russia

Location

Research Site

Yaroslavl, 150003, Russia

Location

Research Site

Bratislava, 833 05, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Nitra, 950 01, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Piešťany, 921 01, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Leeds, LS1 3EX, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Newcastle, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Stanmore, HA7 4LP, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH, Karachalios T, Sancheti P, Poolman RW, Caminis J, Daizadeh N, Dent-Acosta RE, Egbuna O, Chines A, Miclau T. Romosozumab in Skeletally Mature Adults with a Fresh Unilateral Tibial Diaphyseal Fracture: A Randomized Phase-2 Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Aug 19;102(16):1416-1426. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01008.

    PMID: 32358413BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

romosozumab

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Amgen Inc.

Study Officials

  • MD

    Amgen

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2009

First Posted

May 22, 2009

Study Start

September 2, 2009

Primary Completion

March 6, 2012

Study Completion

May 10, 2013

Last Updated

September 22, 2022

Results First Posted

May 1, 2019

Record last verified: 2022-09

Locations