Study Stopped
Risk/benefit ratio did not indicate further study would be useful, or fair to future subjects.
MemoryXL Effects on Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients
MemoryXL
Nutriceutical Effects on Cognitive Status in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
2
Brief Summary
A vitamin nutriceutical, Memory XL, has been shown to provide maintenance of cognitive status in mild, moderate, and severe Alzheimer's disease patients (2 publications by T. Shea). Because this nutriceutical is now patented by the Univ. of Mass., other trials at that institution may be considered a conflict of interest. Therefore, a study of its effects on Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients will be conducted by PI who is not affiliated with Univ. of Mass. or with Dr. Shea. The study hypothesis is: Memory XL will maintain or improve the cognitive and behavioral status of patients diagnosed with MCI during the year of participation in the study; normally, 10-25% of MCI patients convert to mild Alzheimer's dementia each year.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jun 2009
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 26, 2012
CompletedJanuary 26, 2012
January 1, 2012
1.9 years
May 14, 2009
July 26, 2011
January 25, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Differences in Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) at 12 Months From Baseline, by Study Group
Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) is a cognitive test with 5 domains; raw scores can be converted to percentiles for age/education levels, so individuals can be compared. Higher scores mean more competence (0-36 points converted to percentiles so different ages can be compared). Total raw scores for the 5 domains were computed so that Mean and SD of differences between first and last assessments for all subjects, by study arms (nutriceutical = XL and placebo = PL) are reported here.
Baseline and 12 months
Differences in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) Over 12 Months, by Study Group
CDR is a rating scale for 8 aspects of behavior with 0-3 points allowed; higher scores indicate more pathology. Total minimum and maximum scores are 0 and 36 respectively.Clinician rates the patient's behavior and competence with input from family members who live with the patient. ANOVA of differences between baseline and end scores of the CDR scale are reported here, by the study arm/group.
baseline before intervention to 12 months of intervention
Differences in Clock Drawing Test (CLOX) Scores Over 12 Months, by Study Group
Clock Drawing Test is a cognitive screening instrument in which subjects are to draw a clock and set a specified time. Various scoring methods can be employed using 4 to 15 points, with more points showing more competence. This study used the 8-point scoring method, so that 0-8 points could be assigned during each of the baseline and 4 assessment periods during the 12-month study. ANOVA of the differences between baseline and end scores, by study arm/group was completed.
baseline to 12 months
Differences in MiniMental State Exam (MMSE) Scores Over 12 Months, by Study Group
MiniMental State Exam is a cognitive screening device with possible 30 points in several categories; higher points indicate greater competence. Clinician tests orientation, attention, language, \& visuo-spatial construction. Outcome measure is results of an ANOVA of differences between baseline and end/last scores, by study arm/group was completed.
baseline to 12 months
Differences in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Scores Over 12 Months, by Study Group
NPI is a behavior rating scale with 12 categories in which a maximum score of 36 points indicates more pathology than a minimum score of 0. Outcome measure reported here is results of an ANOVA of the differences between baseline and end scores, by study arm/group, to detect any statistically significant difference (nutriceutical vs placebo groups) was completed.
baseline to 12 months
Differences in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scores Over 12 Months, by Study Group
ADL is a behavior rating scale with 6 domains of self-care (feeding, toileting, etc.) in which a maximum score of 18 indicates less competence than a minimum score of 6 (normal skills). Outcome measure is results of ANOVA of the differences between baseline and last/end scores, by study arm/group, to detect any statistically significant differences.
baseline to 12 months
Differences in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scores Over 12 Months, by Study Group
IADL is a behavior rating scale using 9 domains of household and community activities, with a total score of 27 points indicating less competence than a normal function score of 9 points. Outcome measure is results of an ANOVA of the differences between baseline and end/last score, by study arm/group, to detect statistically significant differences (nutriceutical vs placebo).
baseline to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Subjects Who Converted to Early Alzheimer's (Dementia).
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Memory XL
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will take 2 Memory XL pills daily for 12 months (a vitamin nutriceutical developed by Thomas Shea, Ph.D.). Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients, who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, were assessed initially using 3 cognitive tests and 4 behavioral questionnaires, before they began ingesting pills assigned to them by VAMC Research Pharmacist. Each 3 months thereafter, they returned to lab to be reassessed using same instruments, and to receive the next batch of study pills from the Pharmacist. The last assessment was when the patient had just finished 12 months of pill ingestion.
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects diagnosed with MCI took two placebo pills daily for 12 months; these pills are formulated to look and taste the same as the nutriceutical being studied, Memory XL, so study was double-blind. Procedures for this arm are exactly the same as the MEMORY XL arm. MCI subjects were assessed using 3 cognitive tests and 4 behavioral questionnaires, before they began ingesting the pills assigned to them by the Research Pharmacist at VAMC. Each 3 months thereafter, they returned to lab to be reassessed using the same instruments, and to receive next batch of study pills. Last assessment was when patient had completed 12 months of pill ingestion.
Interventions
An over-the-counter vitamin nutriceutical patented by Univ. of Mass. that contains folic acid 400 mg, Vit. B12 6 ug, alpha-tocopherol 30 IU, S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) 400 mg, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) 600 mg, \& acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) 500 mg; 2 pills per day for 12 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- MCI patients diagnosed at the VAMC Center for Alzheimers and Neurodegenerative Disorder (CANDO).
- Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0.5.
- fluent in English.
- able to ambulate to the outpatient clinic and research laboratory
- have sight and hearing levels sufficient to complete neuropsychological testing.
- free from bipolar disorder and terminal illnesses such as cancer.
- must live with a spouse or adult relative who will record nutriceutical ingestion daily.
- subjects will be consecutively diagnosed patients from all ethnic groups.
You may not qualify if:
- patients from protected categories such as prisoners and pregnant women.
- any MCI subject who develops a life-threatening disease such as terminal cancer, stroke, brain trauma, debilitating heart attack, etc.
- indication of inability to make decisions regarding study participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Univ. of Okla. Health Sciences Center & VAMC OKC
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Related Publications (1)
Chan, A., Paskavitz, J., Remington, J.R., Rasmussen, S., Shea, T.B. (2009).
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Benefits of study did not appear to outweigh subject inconvenience, so study was stopped prematurely. Also, very few 'healthy' MCI subjects were recruited from the clinic population; vast majority of MCI patients had exclusionary medical problems.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Marilee Monnot, PhD
- Organization
- UOklahoma Health Sciences Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marilee Monnot, Ph.D.
University of Oklahoma HSC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2009
First Posted
May 18, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
January 26, 2012
Results First Posted
January 26, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-01