Study Stopped
low enrollment and high participant withdraw
Two Anesthetic Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
A Qualitative Comparison of Two Anesthetic Techniques in Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to determine if there is a significant difference in the quality of care between the investigators' two standard anesthesia techniques for children undergoing a MRI of the body and/or extremity MRI. Quality of care will be measured by time spent in the MRI room as well as parental satisfaction, frequency of interruptions of the MRI scan, incidence-severity of respiratory complications, post anesthesia agitation, and time spent in the induction room, MRI room, and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jan 2009
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedSeptember 21, 2020
August 1, 2020
2 years
May 6, 2009
September 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome variable will be the time spent in the MRI room
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary outcome variables include incidence-severity of respiratory complications
2 years
Study Arms (2)
dexmedetomidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORDetermine if there is a significant difference in the quality of care between our two standard anesthesia techniques for children undergoing a MRI of the body and/or extremity MRI.
propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORDetermine if there is a significant difference in the quality of care between our two standard anesthesia techniques for children undergoing a MRI of the body and/or extremity MRI.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects presenting as out-patients, scheduled to receive an anesthetic for MRI of body (spine, chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis) and/or extremity (arm and/or leg).
- The subject must be a candidate for both anesthetic techniques. This decision will be made by a staff member of the Department of Anesthesiology. This staff member will not be a member of the study team and will obtain the consent for Anesthesia.
- The subjects must be 12 months to 7 years (inclusive of the seventh year).
- The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- The subject is residing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, or Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
- Anxiolytic medication is ordered before the MRI (e.g., midazolam or ketamine).
- The subject has a history or a family (parent or sibling) history of malignant hyperthermia.
- The subject has life-threatening, medical conditions (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 4, 5 or 6).
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification scale is a measure of physical status or how healthy the patient is.
- For our study, we will focus on children which are defined as ASA I, II or III which means a healthy child (ASA I), a child with a systemic disease that is mild and well controlled (ASA II) or a child with systemic disease that is severe and controlled (ASA III).
- The subject is allergic to or has a contraindication to any of the drugs used in the study.
- The subject has previously been treated under this protocol.
- The subject has a tracheostomy or other mechanical airway device.
- The subject has received within the past 12 hours an oral or intravenous alpha-adrenergic, beta-adrenergic agonist, or antagonist drugs (e.g., clonidine, propranolol, albuterol).
- The subject is not scheduled to receive anesthesia-sedation care for the MRI.
- The subject received one of the anesthetic regimens for the same MRI during the past six months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cincinnati Children's Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2009
First Posted
May 7, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
September 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08