Intervention for Reduced Sound Tolerance
2 other identifiers
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hyperacusis is the intolerance to sound levels that normally are judged acceptably loud to others. The presence of hyperacusis (diagnosed or undiagnosed) can be an important reason why some persons reject amplified sound from hearing aids. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT), originally proposed for the treatment of persons with debilitating tinnitus, offers the significant secondary benefit of increased Loudness Discomfort Levels (LDLs), along with expansion of the dynamic range for loudness. TRT uses both counseling and sound therapy from daily exposure to soft sound from bilateral noise generator devices (NGs) and has been promoted as an intervention for hyperacusis. The hypothesis of this investigational study is that the counseling and sound therapy principles used in TRT can be applied successfully to treat hearing-impaired hearing-aid candidates with reduced sound tolerance who are otherwise should benefit from hearing aids.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Jul 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2010
CompletedJune 21, 2012
June 1, 2012
8.2 years
April 28, 2009
June 20, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
>=dB-10 change in loudness discomfort level.
5 consecutive monthly appointments
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in the contour 7.
5 consecutive monthly appointments
Study Arms (4)
1
EXPERIMENTALFull treatment = Counseling + sound therapy.
2
EXPERIMENTALCounseling + placebo sound therapy.
3
EXPERIMENTALNo Counseling + Sound Therapy
4
PLACEBO COMPARATORNo counseling + Placebo sound therapy.
Interventions
The conventional sound therapy will be achieved with commercially available noise generators. Our clinic uses General Hearing Instruments (OHI) model Tranquil devices as noise sources for TRT. These flexible devices offer an adjustable volume control, with a frequency response extending from \~500 to 8000 Hz. Matched devices will be fitted binaurally and adjusted to each individual ear to achieve audibility of the noise sources (assessed by slight threshold shifts. typically 10- 15 dB, across the audiometric frequency range above 500 Hz). The sound pressure level output and frequency response of each noise source will be measured and documented using both real ear and standard electroacoustic methodologies. Each subject will be carefully instructed as to care of the instruments and correct volume setting. The bilateral noise generators will be used chronically during the intervention period except during sleep.
The directive counseling to be used will include an in-depth participatory discussion with the patient to review audiometric and functional test results, along with the anatomy and physiology of the auditory system. A minimum of two hours will be scheduled to impart this information to the patients so that they will have a clear understanding of the disorder based upon the most current scientific data. The counseling will be focused on educating the patient, neutralizing their negative emotional association with the hyperacusis, and discussing their treatment.
Patients who are enrolled in Arms 3 and 4 of this study will not be offered directive counseling, but will be fitted with either conventional or placebo noise generators for their sound therapy components. These patients will be told only that their treatment for hyperacusis uses sound therapy. Otherwise, in the instrument fitting appointment (either for the conventional instrument or the placebo device), these patients will receive the same instruction in the care and use of sound generators as those patients enrolled in Treatment Arms 1 and 2 of the clinical trial.
The placebo sound therapy will use factory-modified GHI Tranquil noise generators, which will appear identical to the conventional Tranquil devices. The placebo Tranquil devices will have a control sensor installed to detect insertion of the device in the ear canal. When the sensor detects the insertion of the placebo device into the ear canal it will trigger gradual decay of the sound output from the placebo device, The time constant of the decaying noise output will be sufficiently long to allow the clinician time to set the volume of each binaural set of devices and to instruct the patient in their use before any noticeable sound attenuation occurs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- One hundred adults, who have hearing losses and who have unsuccessfully used hearing aids because of tolerance problems (hyperacusis).
- All subjects must be committed to the use of amplification if and when the hyperacusis is resolved.
- Each patient will have demonstrable hyperacusis, but will be free from tinnitus, and must be willing to wear and usc binaural in-the-ear sound generators (or placebo generators) chronically as prescribed.
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of conductive, mixed hearing loss, or CNS disease.
- Abnormal tone and/or acoustic reflex decay will also preclude subject participation because of the potential for these patients to adapt to the chronic sound therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Alabama, Tuscaloosalead
- University of Marylandcollaborator
- University of Memphiscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Univ. of Maryland - Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2009
First Posted
April 30, 2009
Study Start
July 1, 2002
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
September 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 21, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06