Effect of Preoperative Pupil Size on Quality of Vision After Wavefront-Guided LASIK
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the size of the pupil has an effect on quality of vision in patients undergoing LASIK surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started May 2004
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2009
CompletedApril 29, 2009
April 1, 2009
1.5 years
February 12, 2009
April 28, 2009
Conditions
Study Arms (3)
small
ACTIVE COMPARATORmedium
ACTIVE COMPARATORlarge
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- no more than 6.00 D of spherical myopia
- no more than 3.00 D of refractive astigmatism
- a stable refraction (less than 0.50D per year of sphere or cylinder)
- a corneal diameter of less than 11.0 mm to allow for suction ring fixation
- discontinuation of soft contact wear at least 7 days prior to preoperative evaluation
- visual acuity correctable to at least 20/20
- age older than 21 years
- ability to participate in follow-up examinations for 12 months after LASIK surgery
You may not qualify if:
- use of rigid gas permeable contact lens
- severe dry eye symptoms
- severe blepharitis
- anterior segment abnormalities (i.e. cataracts, corneal scarring, or neovascularization within 1 mm of intended ablation zone)
- recurrent corneal erosion
- severe basement membrane disease
- progressive or unstable myopia or keratoconus
- unstable corneal mires on central keratometry
- corneal thickness in which LASIK procedure would result in less than 250 microns of remaining posterior corneal thickness below the flap postoperatively
- baseline standard manifest refraction of more than 0.75 D in sphere power
- or a difference of greater than 0.50 D in cylinder power compared with baseline standard cycloplegic refraction
- a baseline standard cycloplegic refraction differing more than 0.75 in sphere, 0.50 D in cylinder
- have a different type of astigmatism (i.e. with-the-rule) when the cylinder is greater than 0.50D compared to baseline standard cycloplegic refraction
- preoperative assessment of ocular topography and/or aberrations indicates that either eye is not suitable candidate for LASIK vision correction procedure (i.e. forme fruste keratoconus
- corneal warpage, or pellucid marginal degeneration)
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- SUB INVESTIGATOR
Annie Chan
Stanford University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edward E. Manche
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2009
First Posted
April 29, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2004
Primary Completion
November 1, 2005
Study Completion
November 1, 2005
Last Updated
April 29, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-04